Comparing eBPF and Kernel Modules for Application Vulnerability Detection and Attack Monitoring
Which is better, eBPF or kernel modules for vulnerability detection and attack monitoring? Evidence points towards eBPF.
Both eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) and traditional kernel modules allow for extending the functionality of the Linux kernel. However, they differ significantly in terms of architecture, ease of use, safety, performance, and deployment. This post explores these two technologies in detail, comparing them across various factors and assessing their viability as a context capture tool for application security vulnerability detection and attack monitoring purposes.
eBPF is a technology integrated into the Linux kernel that allows for executing sandboxed programs within the kernel space. eBPF can dynamically load and unload programs, enabling real-time updates and monitoring without system reboots.
Kernel Modules are pieces of code that can be loaded and unloaded into the kernel space to extend the functionality of the kernel. Kernel modules have full access to kernel internals, allowing for deep system interaction but also posing risks to stability and security.
A Comparison of Features: eBPF vs. Kernel Modules
Architecture
eBPF: eBPF programs run in a restricted virtual machine within the Linux kernel, ensuring they can execute safely without risking kernel stability. This isolation minimizes the risk of causing kernel crashes or instability.
Kernel Modules: Kernel modules are loaded directly into the kernel space, allowing them to interact directly with the kernel and hardware. They have full access to kernel internals, which provides powerful capabilities but also increases the risk of introducing bugs or security vulnerabilities.
Safety and Security
eBPF: eBPF programs are verified before execution by the kernel's BPF verifier, which checks for unsafe operations. This sandboxing reduces the risk of crashing the kernel and prevents operations that could destabilize the system.
Kernel Modules: Kernel modules can introduce bugs or security vulnerabilities due to their unrestricted access to kernel internals. Poorly written modules can lead to kernel panics or crashes, affecting system stability.
Performance
eBPF: eBPF is designed to be highly efficient, with the Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler converting eBPF bytecode to native machine code for performance optimization. This allows eBPF to perform tasks with minimal overhead, making it suitable for real-time monitoring without significantly impacting application performance. According to a study by Facebook, eBPF-based monitoring solutions can achieve up to 10x performance improvements over traditional methods.
Kernel Modules: Kernel modules can achieve high performance due to their direct integration with the kernel and ability to interact directly with hardware. They can be highly optimized for specific tasks, leveraging the full power of the kernel and hardware. However, their impact on system performance can be significant if not carefully managed.
Deployment and Development
eBPF: eBPF programs can be dynamically loaded and unloaded without requiring system reboots, allowing for real-time updates to monitoring and detection logic. The extensive tooling support, including BPF Compiler Collection (BCC), bpftrace, and libbpf, simplifies the development and debugging of eBPF programs.
Kernel Modules: Kernel modules require building against specific kernel versions and can require a system reboot to load or unload. Developing kernel modules requires in-depth knowledge of kernel internals and careful handling of kernel APIs and memory management, making the process more complex and error-prone compared to eBPF.
What the Deployment Code Looks Like
eBPF Deployment Code Example
Kernel Module Deployment Code Example
Which Approach is better for Application Security Vulnerability Detection and Attack Monitoring?
Understanding the Strengths of Weaknesses of eBPF programs and Kernel Modules
eBPF: Ideal for runtime behavior monitoring, network security, and system call tracing. eBPF allows for fine-grained monitoring of system calls, network packets, and application-level events, which can be used to detect anomalies and potential security issues.
Kernel Modules: Suitable for deep system monitoring and custom security solutions that require full access to kernel internals. Kernel modules can implement custom functionality that is not possible with eBPF, providing more flexibility for specialized security requirements.
eBPF Programs
Strengths: Real-time updates, low-performance impact, safe execution within a sandboxed environment.
Advantages: Ability to dynamically update monitoring rules and detection logic without system downtime, minimal performance impact, and enhanced security through sandboxing.
Use Cases: Monitoring system calls, network activity, and application behavior to detect anomalies and potential security issues.
Kernel Modules
Strengths: Comprehensive monitoring capabilities with full access to kernel and system internals.
Advantages: High performance and deep integration with the kernel, suitable for implementing bespoke security solutions.
Use Cases: In-depth monitoring of system behavior, including hardware interactions and low-level operations.
Conclusion
When it comes to application security vulnerability detection and attack monitoring, both eBPF and kernel modules offer distinct advantages and limitations.
eBPF provides a flexible, safe, and low-overhead solution that is well-suited for real-time monitoring and dynamic updates, making it ideal for modern, high-performance environments.
Kernel modules offer powerful and comprehensive monitoring capabilities with full access to system internals, but they come with higher risks in terms of system stability and security and are more complex to deploy and maintain.
Choosing between eBPF and kernel modules depends on your specific requirements, including the depth of monitoring needed, performance considerations, and the complexity of deployment and maintenance.
Learn how Kodem’s proprietary runtime intelligence utilizes eBPF technology in our sensors in this blog,
Achieve Deep Application Visibility Powered by eBPF >>
More blogs
A Primer on Runtime Intelligence
See how Kodem's cutting-edge sensor technology revolutionizes application monitoring at the kernel level.
Platform Overview Video
Watch our short platform overview video to see how Kodem discovers real security risks in your code at runtime.