Hugging Face Datasets and Tokenizers in JavaScript: Security Issues for AI Pipelines

This series shows how vulnerabilities propagate through the stack and provides a framework for defending AI applications in production.

Introduction

Hugging Face Datasets and Tokenizers.js are integral to many JavaScript and TypeScript AI pipelines. They handle ingestion, normalization, and preprocessing of text data. These libraries appear safe but introduce critical security issues at the application layer.

Malicious Dataset Injection

Hugging Face Datasets allows direct loading of datasets from the Hub. Attackers have uploaded poisoned datasets containing adversarial samples and malicious metadata. In one case, metadata fields included embedded escape sequences that broke JSON parsers, leaking system-level error messages. Applications that pulled datasets blindly into preprocessing pipelines became vulnerable to denial of service and data leakage.

Tokenizer Vulnerabilities

Tokenizers.js handles splitting text into subword units. Improper handling of malformed Unicode sequences can trigger buffer overflows in WASM-based tokenizers. In 2022, a proof-of-concept showed how specially crafted Unicode payloads could crash applications and, in some cases, corrupt memory beyond the tokenizer sandbox. For production AI applications, this represents a direct reliability and security issue.

Data Leakage in Preprocessing Pipelines

AI preprocessing pipelines often log intermediate outputs. When Hugging Face Datasets are used without sanitization, sensitive personally identifiable information (PII) can be logged in plain text. In one real incident, a pipeline ingesting customer support chat logs leaked user credentials into system logs during preprocessing.

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

Threat Vector MITRE Technique(s) Example
Poisoned datasets T1565 – Data Manipulation Malicious Hugging Face dataset metadata causing DoS and error leaks
Tokenizer buffer overflow T1203 – Exploitation for Client Execution Malformed Unicode payload crashing WASM tokenizer
Sensitive data leakage T1530 – Data from Cloud Storage Object Preprocessing logs exposing customer credentials

Conclusion

Datasets and Tokenizers.js introduce underestimated risks in AI pipelines. Poisoned datasets, buffer overflows in WASM tokenizers, and uncontrolled data leakage all compromise application security. Product security teams must enforce dataset provenance, validate Unicode input handling, and prevent sensitive logging at preprocessing stages.

References

  • Hugging Face. (2024). Datasets security practices. Hugging Face Documentation. https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets
  • MITRE ATT&CK®. (2024). ATT&CK Techniques. MITRE. https://attack.mitre.org/
  • Wichers, D. (2022). Top 10 Web Application Security Risks. OWASP. https://owasp.org/Top10
  • SecurityWeek. (2022, July 5). New vulnerabilities found in WebAssembly runtimes. SecurityWeek. https://www.securityweek.com
Table of contents

Related blogs

Prompt Injection was Never the Real Problem

A review of “The Promptware Kill Chain”Over the last two years, “prompt injection” has become the SQL injection of the LLM era: widely referenced, poorly defined, and often blamed for failures that have little to do with prompts themselves.A recent arXiv paper, “The Promptware Kill Chain: How Prompt Injections Gradually Evolved Into a Multi-Step Malware,” tries to correct that by reframing prompt injection as just the initial access phase of a broader, multi-stage attack chain.As a security researcher working on real production AppSec and AI systems, I think this paper is directionally right and operationally incomplete.This post is a technical critique: what the paper gets right, where the analogy breaks down, and how defenders should actually think about agentic system compromise.

January 16, 2026

A Guide to Securing AI Code Editors: Cursor, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and OpenAI Codex

AI-powered code editors such as Cursor, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and OpenAI Codex are rapidly becoming part of enterprise development environments.

October 31, 2025

From Discovery to Resolution: A Single Source of Truth for Vulnerability Statuses

Continuous visibility from first discovery to final resolution across code repositories and container images, showing who fixed each vulnerability, when it was resolved and how long closure took. Kodem turns issue statuses into ownership for engineers, progress tracking for leadership and defensible risk reduction for application security.

October 27, 2025

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.

Get a personalized demo
Get a personalized demo

A Primer on Runtime Intelligence

See how Kodem's cutting-edge sensor technology revolutionizes application monitoring at the kernel level.

5.1k
Applications covered
1.1m
False positives eliminated
4.8k
Triage hours reduced

Platform Overview Video

Watch our short platform overview video to see how Kodem discovers real security risks in your code at runtime.

5.1k
Applications covered
1.1m
False positives eliminated
4.8k
Triage hours reduced

The State of the Application Security Workflow

This report aims to equip readers with actionable insights that can help future-proof their security programs. Kodem, the publisher of this report, purpose built a platform that bridges these gaps by unifying shift-left strategies with runtime monitoring and protection.

Get real-time insights across the full stack…code, containers, OS, and memory

Watch how Kodem’s runtime security platform detects and blocks attacks before they cause damage. No guesswork. Just precise, automated protection.

Stay up-to-date on Audit Nexus

A curated resource for the many updates to cybersecurity and AI risk regulations, frameworks, and standards.

Mahesh Babu
Publish date

0 min read

Application Security