Security Issues in popular AI Runtimes - Node.js, Deno, and Bun
Introduction
Node.js, Deno, and Bun are the primary runtimes for executing JavaScript and TypeScript in modern applications. They form the backbone of AI backends, serverless deployments, and orchestration layers. Each runtime introduces distinct application security issues. For product security teams, understanding these runtime weaknesses is essential because attacks often bypass framework-level defenses and exploit the runtime directly.
Node.js: Prototype Pollution and Module Injection
Node.js powers most enterprise AI backends. Prototype pollution remains one of the most common attack vectors. Vulnerable libraries such as Lodash (CVE-2019-10744) allow attackers to inject malicious properties into global objects. This leads to privilege escalation inside runtime processes.
Module injection is another major risk. Applications that use require() with unvalidated paths can be tricked into loading malicious modules. In one real incident, an attacker poisoned the npm registry with a typosquatted package (expres instead of express), leading Node.js applications to load a backdoored module that exfiltrated environment variables.
Deno: Permission Model Misuse
Deno was designed with a stricter permission model than Node.js. Developers must explicitly grant file, network, or environment variable access. In practice, many teams disable these controls with the --allow-all flag for convenience. This reintroduces Node.js–style risks and undermines Deno’s security design. In test deployments, attackers exploited over-permissive Deno configurations to access local files containing API keys.
Bun: Immature Ecosystem and WASM Risks
Bun is the newest runtime and aims to outperform Node.js and Deno. Its ecosystem is immature, which means fewer security audits and less hardened libraries. Bun also integrates deeply with WebAssembly (WASM). Exploits in WASM runtimes have demonstrated sandbox escapes, enabling arbitrary code execution. In one proof-of-concept, malformed WASM payloads in Bun caused memory corruption, highlighting the risks of relying on an immature runtime for production AI workloads.
MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
Conclusion
Node.js, Deno, and Bun are powerful but not secure by default. Node.js remains vulnerable to prototype pollution and module injection. Deno’s permission system is often bypassed through developer misconfiguration. Bun introduces WASM-specific risks and suffers from ecosystem immaturity. For product security teams, runtime-level defenses such as strict configuration policies, dependency validation, and runtime anomaly monitoring are critical to securing AI applications.
References
- npm, Inc. (2018). event-stream incident report. npm Blog. https://blog.npmjs.org/post/180565383195/details-about-the-event-stream-incident
- OWASP. (2021). JavaScript prototype pollution. OWASP Foundation. https://owasp.org/www-community/vulnerabilities/Prototype_Pollution
- MITRE ATT&CK®. (2024). ATT&CK Techniques. MITRE. https://attack.mitre.org/
- SecurityWeek. (2022, July 5). New vulnerabilities found in WebAssembly runtimes. SecurityWeek. https://www.securityweek.com
Related blogs

Prompt Injection was Never the Real Problem
A review of “The Promptware Kill Chain”Over the last two years, “prompt injection” has become the SQL injection of the LLM era: widely referenced, poorly defined, and often blamed for failures that have little to do with prompts themselves.A recent arXiv paper, “The Promptware Kill Chain: How Prompt Injections Gradually Evolved Into a Multi-Step Malware,” tries to correct that by reframing prompt injection as just the initial access phase of a broader, multi-stage attack chain.As a security researcher working on real production AppSec and AI systems, I think this paper is directionally right and operationally incomplete.This post is a technical critique: what the paper gets right, where the analogy breaks down, and how defenders should actually think about agentic system compromise.
A Guide to Securing AI Code Editors: Cursor, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and OpenAI Codex
AI-powered code editors such as Cursor, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and OpenAI Codex are rapidly becoming part of enterprise development environments.
From Discovery to Resolution: A Single Source of Truth for Vulnerability Statuses
Continuous visibility from first discovery to final resolution across code repositories and container images, showing who fixed each vulnerability, when it was resolved and how long closure took. Kodem turns issue statuses into ownership for engineers, progress tracking for leadership and defensible risk reduction for application security.
A Primer on Runtime Intelligence
See how Kodem's cutting-edge sensor technology revolutionizes application monitoring at the kernel level.
Platform Overview Video
Watch our short platform overview video to see how Kodem discovers real security risks in your code at runtime.
The State of the Application Security Workflow
This report aims to equip readers with actionable insights that can help future-proof their security programs. Kodem, the publisher of this report, purpose built a platform that bridges these gaps by unifying shift-left strategies with runtime monitoring and protection.
.png)
Get real-time insights across the full stack…code, containers, OS, and memory
Watch how Kodem’s runtime security platform detects and blocks attacks before they cause damage. No guesswork. Just precise, automated protection.

Stay up-to-date on Audit Nexus
A curated resource for the many updates to cybersecurity and AI risk regulations, frameworks, and standards.
