Summary
Heap OOB and CHECK fail in ResourceGather
For more information
Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.
Attribution
This vulnerability has been reported by members of the Aivul Team from Qihoo 360.
Impact
An attacker can trigger a crash via a CHECK-fail in debug builds of TensorFlow using tf.raw_ops.ResourceGather or a read from outside the bounds of heap allocated data in the same API in a release build:
import tensorflow as tf
tensor = tf.constant(value=[[1,2],[3,4],[5,6]],shape=(3,2),dtype=tf.uint32)
v = tf.Variable(tensor)
tf.raw_ops.ResourceGather(
resource=v.handle,
indices=[0],
dtype=tf.uint32,
batch_dims=10,
validate_indices=False)
The implementation does not check that the batch_dims value that the user supplies is less than the rank of the input tensor.
Since the implementation uses several for loops over the dimensions of tensor, this results in reading data from outside the bounds of heap allocated buffer backing the tensor:
// batch_dims_ = > params.dims() (10 > 2)
for (int i = 0; i < batch_dims_; ++i) {
result_shape.AddDim(params.dim_size(i));
}
for (int i = batch_dims_; i < indices.dims(); ++i) {
result_shape.AddDim(indices.dim_size(i));
}
for (int i = batch_dims_ + 1; i < params.dims(); ++i) {
result_shape.AddDim(params.dim_size(i));
}
In debug mode, .dim_size(i) validates that the argument is less than .dims() using a DCHECK. But the DCHECK is a no-op in release builds.
A read operation accesses a memory location beyond the intended buffer boundary. Typical impact: sensitive data disclosure or crash.
CVE-2021-37654 has a CVSS score of 7.3 (High). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.3.4, 2.4.3, 2.5.1); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
We have patched the issue in GitHub commit bc9c546ce7015c57c2f15c168b3d9201de679a1d.
The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.6.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.5.1, TensorFlow 2.4.3, and TensorFlow 2.3.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2021-37654? CVE-2021-37654 is a high-severity out-of-bounds read vulnerability in tensorflow (pip), affecting versions < 2.3.4. It is fixed in 2.3.4, 2.4.3, 2.5.1. A read operation accesses a memory location beyond the intended buffer boundary.
- How severe is CVE-2021-37654? CVE-2021-37654 has a CVSS score of 7.3 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which packages are affected by CVE-2021-37654?
tensorflow(pip) (versions < 2.3.4)tensorflow-cpu(pip) (versions < 2.3.4)tensorflow-gpu(pip) (versions < 2.3.4)
- Is there a fix for CVE-2021-37654? Yes. CVE-2021-37654 is fixed in 2.3.4, 2.4.3, 2.5.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2021-37654 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2021-37654 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2021-37654 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2021-37654?
- Upgrade
tensorflowto 2.3.4 or later - Upgrade
tensorflowto 2.4.3 or later - Upgrade
tensorflowto 2.5.1 or later - Upgrade
tensorflow-cputo 2.3.4 or later - Upgrade
tensorflow-cputo 2.4.3 or later - Upgrade
tensorflow-cputo 2.5.1 or later - Upgrade
tensorflow-gputo 2.3.4 or later - Upgrade
tensorflow-gputo 2.4.3 or later - Upgrade
tensorflow-gputo 2.5.1 or later
- Upgrade