Summary
Privilege escalation in project role template binding (PRTB) and -promoted roles
Workarounds
If updating Rancher to a patched version is not possible, then the following workarounds must be observed to mitigate this issue:
- Only grant Project Owner and Manage Project Members roles to trusted users.
- Minimize the creation of custom roles that contain the
escalate,*or write verbs (create,delete,patch,update) onprojectroletemplatebindingsresource, and only grant such custom roles to trusted users. - Minimize the number of users that have permissions to
create,patchandupdateroletemplates.
Detection
The following script was developed to list role template bindings that give written access to the affected resources listed above. It is highly recommended to run the script in your environment and review the list of identified roles and role template bindings for possible signs of exploitation of this issue. The script requires jq installed and a kubeconfig with access to Rancher local cluster; it can also be executed in Rancher's kubectl shell.
#!/bin/bash
help="
Usage: bash find_promoted_resource.sh \n \n
Requires: \n
- jq installed and on path \n
- A kubeconfig pointing at rancher's local cluster (can also run from rancher's kubectl shell) \n \n
Outputs a list of roletemplates and roletemplate bindings which give write access to promoted resources.
"
if [[ $1 == "-h" || $1 == "--help" ]]
then
echo -e $help
exit 0
fi
# first, get the current roletemplates so that we only issue a get once
kubectl get roletemplates.management.cattle.io -o json >> script_templates.json
# find roles which have write access to a promoted resource. Filter on roleTemplates which fulfill all requirements:
# Have a project context
# Have some rules
# Have one/more of the target api groups, or a * in the api groups
# Have one/more of the target resources, or a * in the resources
# Have a verb that is not read access (i.e. a verb that is not get/list/watch)
roles=$(jq --argjson apiGroups '["", "ui.cattle.io", "core", "storage.k8s.io", "apiregistration.k8s.io", "catalog.cattle.io", "management.cattle.io"]' --argjson resources '["navlinks", "persistentvolumes", "nodes", "storageclasses", "apiservices", "clusterrepos", "clusters"]' --argjson verbs '["get", "list", "watch"]' '.items[] | select(.context=="project" and (.rules | length >= 1)) | select( .rules[] | select( (($apiGroups - .apiGroups | length < 7) or (.apiGroups | index("*"))) and (($resources - .resources | length < 7) or (.resources | index("*"))) and (.verbs - $verbs | length > 0)) | length >= 1 ) | .metadata.name' script_templates.json | jq -s )
# log promoted roles which give direct write access so they can be easily fixed
echo "The following role templates give direct write access to a promoted resource:"
echo $roles
echo -e ""
# find any roles which inherit first-level roles. Mostly a BFS which radiates outward from the known bad roles
old_roles="[]"
new_roles="$roles"
old_length=$(echo $old_roles | jq 'length')
new_length=$(echo $new_roles | jq 'length')
# if our last loop found nothing new, it's safe to stop
while [[ $old_length != $new_length ]];
do
# set old values to what we currently know about
old_roles=$new_roles
old_length=$new_length
# update new values with anything that inherits a "bad" role we know about
new_roles=$(jq --argjson roles "$old_roles" --argjson roleLen "$old_length" '.items[] | .metadata.name as $NAME | select (( $roles | index($NAME)) or ((.roleTemplateNames | length > 0 ) and ($roles - .roleTemplateNames | length < $roleLen))) | .metadata.name ' script_templates.json | jq -s)
new_length=$(echo $new_roles | jq 'length')
done
roles=$new_roles
# log all roles which can give write access, even if it's not first level
echo -e "The following role templates give write access to a promoted resource directly or through inheritance:"
echo $roles
echo -e ""
kubectl get projectroletemplatebindings.management.cattle.io -A -o json >> script_bindings.json
role_template_bindings=$(jq --argjson roleTemplates "$roles" '.items[] | .roleTemplateName as $TemplateName | select($roleTemplates | index($TemplateName)) | .metadata.name' script_bindings.json | jq -s)
# since these bindings could be for users or groups, we need to include all fields which could help identify the subject. But they won't all be present, which makes the list look less pretty
echo -e "The following is a list of bindings which give access to promoted resource, with the format of: bindingName, projectName, userName, userPrincipalName, groupName, groupPrincipalName: "
echo $(jq --argjson bindings "$role_template_bindings" '.items[] | .metadata.name as $BindingName | select ( $bindings | index($BindingName)) | .metadata.name, .projectName, .userName?, .userPrincipalName?, .groupName?, .groupPrincipalName?' script_bindings.json | jq -s)
unset old_roles
unset new_roles
unset roles
unset role_template_bindings
rm script_templates.json
rm script_bindings.json
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Reach out to SUSE Rancher Security team for security related inquiries.
- Open an issue in Rancher repository.
- Verify our support matrix and product support lifecycle
Impact
An issue was discovered in Rancher versions from 2.5.0 up to and including 2.5.16 and from 2.6.0 up to and including 2.6.9, where an authorization logic flaw allows privilege escalation via project role template binding (PRTB) and -promoted roles. This issue is not present in Rancher 2.7 releases.
Note: Consult Rancher documentation for more information about cluster and project roles and KB 000020097 for information about -promoted roles.
This privilege escalation is possible for users with access to the escalate verb on PRTBs (projectroletemplatebindings.management.cattle.io), including users with * verbs on PRTBs (see notes below for more information). These users can escalate permissions for any -promoted resource (see the table below for a full enumeration) in any cluster where they have a PRTB granting such permissions in at least one project in the cluster.
On a default Rancher setup, only the following roles have such permissions:
- Project Owner
- Manage Project Members
These roles have permissions to affect the following resources:
| Resource | API Group | Affected Rancher version |
|---|---|---|
| navlinks | ui.cattle.io | 2.6 |
| nodes | "" | 2.6 |
| persistentvolumes | "" | 2.5, 2.6 |
| persistentvolumes | core | 2.5, 2.6 |
| storageclasses | storage.k8s.io | 2.5, 2.6 |
| apiservices | apiregistration.k8s.io | 2.5, 2.6 |
| clusterrepos | catalog.cattle.io | 2.5, 2.6 |
clusters (local only) |
management.cattle.io | 2.5, 2.6 |
Notes:
- During the calculation of the CVSS score,
privileges requiredwas considered ashighbecause, by default,standard useranduser-baseusers in Rancher do not havecreate,patchandupdatepermissions onroletemplates. - If a role template with access to those objects was already created by another user in the cluster, then this issue can be exploited by users without the mentioned permissions from point 1.
The application assigns, modifies, tracks, or checks privileges incorrectly, allowing a user to gain elevated access. Typical impact: privilege escalation beyond the intended level.
CVE-2022-43759 has a CVSS score of 7.2 (High). The vector is network-reachable, high privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.5.17, 2.6.10); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Patched versions include releases 2.5.17 and 2.6.10 and later versions. This issue is not present in Rancher 2.7 releases.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2022-43759? CVE-2022-43759 is a high-severity improper privilege management vulnerability in github.com/rancher/rancher (go), affecting versions >= 2.5.0, < 2.5.17. It is fixed in 2.5.17, 2.6.10. The application assigns, modifies, tracks, or checks privileges incorrectly, allowing a user to gain elevated access.
- How severe is CVE-2022-43759? CVE-2022-43759 has a CVSS score of 7.2 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of github.com/rancher/rancher are affected by CVE-2022-43759? github.com/rancher/rancher (go) versions >= 2.5.0, < 2.5.17 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2022-43759? Yes. CVE-2022-43759 is fixed in 2.5.17, 2.6.10. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2022-43759 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2022-43759 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2022-43759 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2022-43759?
- Upgrade
github.com/rancher/rancherto 2.5.17 or later - Upgrade
github.com/rancher/rancherto 2.6.10 or later
- Upgrade