Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: brcmfmac: Fix...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: brcmfmac: Fix potential shift-out-of-bounds in brcmf_fw_alloc_request()
This patch fixes a shift-out-of-bounds in brcmfmac that occurs in
BIT(chiprev) when a 'chiprev' provided by the device is too large.
It should also not be equal to or greater than BITS_PER_TYPE(u32)
as we do bitwise AND with a u32 variable and BIT(chiprev). The patch
adds a check that makes the function return NULL if that is the case.
Note that the NULL case is later handled by the bus-specific caller,
brcmf_usb_probe_cb() or brcmf_usb_reset_resume(), for example.
Found by a modified version of syzkaller.
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c
shift exponent 151055786 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
CPU: 0 PID: 1885 Comm: kworker/0:2 Tainted: G O 5.14.0+ #132
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d
ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x40
__ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds.cold+0x53/0xdb
? lock_chain_count+0x20/0x20
brcmf_fw_alloc_request.cold+0x19/0x3ea
? brcmf_fw_get_firmwares+0x250/0x250
? brcmf_usb_ioctl_resp_wait+0x1a7/0x1f0
brcmf_usb_get_fwname+0x114/0x1a0
? brcmf_usb_reset_resume+0x120/0x120
? number+0x6c4/0x9a0
brcmf_c_process_clm_blob+0x168/0x590
? put_dec+0x90/0x90
? enable_ptr_key_workfn+0x20/0x20
? brcmf_common_pd_remove+0x50/0x50
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
brcmf_c_preinit_dcmds+0x673/0xc40
? brcmf_c_set_joinpref_default+0x100/0x100
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
? lock_acquire+0x19d/0x4e0
? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x110
? brcmf_usb_deq+0x1cc/0x260
? mark_held_locks+0x9f/0xe0
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x273/0x3e0
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x47/0x50
? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0x120
? brcmf_usb_deq+0x1a7/0x260
? brcmf_usb_rx_fill_all+0x5a/0xf0
brcmf_attach+0x246/0xd40
? wiphy_new_nm+0x1476/0x1d50
? kmemdup+0x30/0x40
brcmf_usb_probe+0x12de/0x1690
? brcmf_usbdev_qinit.constprop.0+0x470/0x470
usb_probe_interface+0x25f/0x710
really_probe+0x1be/0xa90
__driver_probe_device+0x2ab/0x460
? usb_match_id.part.0+0x88/0xc0
driver_probe_device+0x49/0x120
__device_attach_driver+0x18a/0x250
? driver_allows_async_probing+0x120/0x120
bus_for_each_drv+0x123/0x1a0
? bus_rescan_devices+0x20/0x20
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x273/0x3e0
? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0x120
__device_attach+0x207/0x330
? device_bind_driver+0xb0/0xb0
? kobject_uevent_env+0x230/0x12c0
bus_probe_device+0x1a2/0x260
device_add+0xa61/0x1ce0
? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xe7/0x660
? __fw_devlink_link_to_suppliers+0x550/0x550
usb_set_configuration+0x984/0x1770
? kernfs_create_link+0x175/0x230
usb_generic_driver_probe+0x69/0x90
usb_probe_device+0x9c/0x220
really_probe+0x1be/0xa90
__driver_probe_device+0x2ab/0x460
driver_probe_device+0x49/0x120
__device_attach_driver+0x18a/0x250
? driver_allows_async_probing+0x120/0x120
bus_for_each_drv+0x123/0x1a0
? bus_rescan_devices+0x20/0x20
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x273/0x3e0
? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0x120
__device_attach+0x207/0x330
? device_bind_driver+0xb0/0xb0
? kobject_uevent_env+0x230/0x12c0
bus_probe_device+0x1a2/0x260
device_add+0xa61/0x1ce0
? __fw_devlink_link_to_suppliers+0x550/0x550
usb_new_device.cold+0x463/0xf66
? hub_disconnect+0x400/0x400
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30
hub_event+0x10d5/0x3330
? hub_port_debounce+0x280/0x280
? __lock_acquire+0x1671/0x5790
? wq_calc_node_cpumask+0x170/0x2a0
? lock_release+0x640/0x640
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x273/0x3e0
process_one_work+0x873/0x13e0
? lock_release+0x640/0x640
? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x320/0x320
? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90
worker_thread+0x8b/0xd10
? __kthread_parkme+0xd9/0x1d0
? pr
---truncated---
Impact
A read operation accesses a memory location beyond the intended buffer boundary. Typical impact: sensitive data disclosure or crash.
CVE-2022-50551 has a CVSS score of 7.1 (High). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2022-50551? CVE-2022-50551 is a high-severity out-of-bounds read vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet. A read operation accesses a memory location beyond the intended buffer boundary.
- How severe is CVE-2022-50551? CVE-2022-50551 has a CVSS score of 7.1 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2022-50551? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2022-50551 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2022-50551 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2022-50551 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2022-50551 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.