CVE-2023-40015

Vyper: reversed order of side effects for some operations

Workarounds

When using expressions from the list above, make sure that the arguments of the expression do not produce side effects or, if one does, that no other argument is dependent on those side effects.

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

For the following (probably non-exhaustive) list of expressions, the compiler evaluates the arguments from right to left instead of left to right.

- unsafe_add
- unsafe_sub
- unsafe_mul
- unsafe_div
- pow_mod256
- |, &, ^ (bitwise operators)
- bitwise_or (deprecated)
- bitwise_and (deprecated)
- bitwise_xor (deprecated)
- raw_call
- <, >, <=, >=, ==, !=
- in, not in (when lhs and rhs are enums)

This behaviour becomes a problem when the evaluation of one of the arguments produces side effects that other arguments depend on. The following expressions can produce side-effect:

• state modifying external call
• state modifying internal call
• raw_call
• pop() when used on a Dynamic Array stored in the storage
• create_minimal_proxy_to
• create_copy_of
• create_from_blueprint

For example:

f:uint256

@internal
def side_effect() -> uint256:
    self.f = 12
    return 1

@external
def foo() -> uint256:
    return unsafe_add(self.f,self.side_effect()) # returns 13 instead of 1

a:DynArray[uint256, 12]
@external
def bar() -> bool:
    self.a = [1,2,3]
    return len(self.a) == self.a.pop() # return false instead of true

CVE-2023-40015 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.

Kodem intelligence

Already deployed Kodem?

not yet patched, will address in a future release. tracking in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/issues/3604.

1. What is CVE-2023-40015? CVE-2023-40015 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in vyper (pip), affecting versions <= 0.4.2. No fixed version is listed yet.
2. How severe is CVE-2023-40015? CVE-2023-40015 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
3. Which versions of vyper are affected by CVE-2023-40015? vyper (pip) versions <= 0.4.2 is affected.
4. Is there a fix for CVE-2023-40015? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2023-40015 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
5. Is CVE-2023-40015 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2023-40015 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
6. What actually determines whether CVE-2023-40015 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.

Other vulnerabilities in vyper