Summary
incorrect order of evaluation of side effects for some builtins
Workarounds
When using builtins from the list above, make sure that the arguments of the expression do not produce side effects or, if one does, that no other argument is dependent on those side effects.
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
Impact
The order of evaluation of the arguments of the builtin functions uint256_addmod, uint256_mulmod, ecadd and ecmul does not follow source order.
• For uint256_addmod(a,b,c) and uint256_mulmod(a,b,c), the order is c,a,b.
• For ecadd(a,b) and ecmul(a,b), the order is b,a.
Note that this behaviour is problematic when the evaluation of one of the arguments produces side effects that other arguments depend on.
CVE-2023-41052 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.3.10rc1); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2023-41052? CVE-2023-41052 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in vyper (pip), affecting versions <= 0.3.9. It is fixed in 0.3.10rc1.
- How severe is CVE-2023-41052? CVE-2023-41052 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of vyper are affected by CVE-2023-41052? vyper (pip) versions <= 0.3.9 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2023-41052? Yes. CVE-2023-41052 is fixed in 0.3.10rc1. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2023-41052 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2023-41052 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2023-41052 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2023-41052? Upgrade
vyperto 0.3.10rc1 or later.