Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: erofs: Fix detection of...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
erofs: Fix detection of atomic context
Current check for atomic context is not sufficient as
z_erofs_decompressqueue_endio can be called under rcu lock
from blk_mq_flush_plug_list(). See the stacktrace [1]
In such case we should hand off the decompression work for async
processing rather than trying to do sync decompression in current
context. Patch fixes the detection by checking for
rcu_read_lock_any_held() and while at it use more appropriate
!in_task() check than in_atomic().
Background: Historically erofs would always schedule a kworker for
decompression which would incur the scheduling cost regardless of
the context. But z_erofs_decompressqueue_endio() may not always
be in atomic context and we could actually benefit from doing the
decompression in z_erofs_decompressqueue_endio() if we are in
thread context, for example when running with dm-verity.
This optimization was later added in patch [2] which has shown
improvement in performance benchmarks.
==============================================
[1] Problem stacktrace
[name:core&]BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:291
[name:core&]in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1615, name: CpuMonitorServi
[name:core&]preempt_count: 0, expected: 0
[name:core&]RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 0
CPU: 7 PID: 1615 Comm: CpuMonitorServi Tainted: G S W OE 6.1.25-android14-5-maybe-dirty-mainline #1
Hardware name: MT6897 (DT)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x108/0x15c
show_stack+0x20/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x8c
dump_stack+0x20/0x48
__might_resched+0x1fc/0x308
__might_sleep+0x50/0x88
mutex_lock+0x2c/0x110
z_erofs_decompress_queue+0x11c/0xc10
z_erofs_decompress_kickoff+0x110/0x1a4
z_erofs_decompressqueue_endio+0x154/0x180
bio_endio+0x1b0/0x1d8
__dm_io_complete+0x22c/0x280
clone_endio+0xe4/0x280
bio_endio+0x1b0/0x1d8
blk_update_request+0x138/0x3a4
blk_mq_plug_issue_direct+0xd4/0x19c
blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x2b0/0x354
__blk_flush_plug+0x110/0x160
blk_finish_plug+0x30/0x4c
read_pages+0x2fc/0x370
page_cache_ra_unbounded+0xa4/0x23c
page_cache_ra_order+0x290/0x320
do_sync_mmap_readahead+0x108/0x2c0
filemap_fault+0x19c/0x52c
__do_fault+0xc4/0x114
handle_mm_fault+0x5b4/0x1168
do_page_fault+0x338/0x4b4
do_translation_fault+0x40/0x60
do_mem_abort+0x60/0xc8
el0_da+0x4c/0xe0
el0t_64_sync_handler+0xd4/0xfc
el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4
Impact
CVE-2023-53231 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2023-53231? CVE-2023-53231 is a medium-severity security vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet.
- How severe is CVE-2023-53231? CVE-2023-53231 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2023-53231? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2023-53231 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2023-53231 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2023-53231 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2023-53231 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.