Summary
tiny-secp256k1 vulnerable to private key extraction when signing a malicious JSON-stringifyable message in bundled environment
Private key can be extracted on signing a malicious JSON-stringifiable object, when global Buffer is buffer package
Details
This affects only environments where require('buffer') is https://npmjs.com/buffer
E.g.: browser bundles, React Native apps, etc.
Buffer.isBuffer check can be bypassed, resulting in k reuse for different messages, leading to private key extraction over a single invalid message (and a second one for which any message/signature could be taken, e.g. previously known valid one)
v2.x is unaffected as it verifies input to be an actual Uint8Array instance
Such a message can be constructed for any already known message/signature pair, meaning that the attack needs only a single malicious message being signed for a full key extraction
While signing unverified attacker-controlled messages would be problematic itself (and exploitation of this needs such a scenario), signing a single message still should not leak the private key
Also, message validation could have the same bug (out of scope for this report, but could be possible in some situations), which makes this attack more likely when used in a chain
https://github.com/bitcoinjs/tiny-secp256k1/pull/140 is a subtle fix for this
PoC
This code deliberately doesn't provide funnyBuffer and extractTiny for now, could be updated later
import secp256k1 from 'tiny-secp256k1'
import crypto from 'crypto'
const key = crypto.randomBytes(32)
const msg0 = crypto.randomBytes(32)
const sig0 = secp256k1.sign(msg0, key).toString('hex')
const msg1 = funnyBuffer(msg0)
const sig1 = secp256k1.sign(msg1, key).toString('hex')
const restored = extractTiny(msg0, sig0, sig1)
console.log('Guesses:', JSON.stringify(restored, undefined, 2))
const recheck = (k) => secp256k1.sign(msg0, Buffer.from(k, 'hex')).toString('hex') === sig0
console.log('Rechecked:', JSON.stringify(restored.filter(recheck)))
console.log('Actual key', key.toString('hex'))
Output:
Guesses: [
"8f351953047e6b149e0595547e7d10a8a1edc61bd519b5b2514202a495e434ed",
"ebc81e1632a1b3255589ba84364949a0a6fd0229444519765570706d394671dd"
]
Rechecked: ["ebc81e1632a1b3255589ba84364949a0a6fd0229444519765570706d394671dd"]
Actual key ebc81e1632a1b3255589ba84364949a0a6fd0229444519765570706d394671dd
Impact
Full private key extraction when signing a single malicious message (that passes JSON.stringify/JSON.parse and can come from network)
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2024-49364? CVE-2024-49364 is a high-severity security vulnerability in tiny-secp256k1 (npm), affecting versions <= 1.1.6. It is fixed in 1.1.7.
- Which versions of tiny-secp256k1 are affected by CVE-2024-49364? tiny-secp256k1 (npm) versions <= 1.1.6 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2024-49364? Yes. CVE-2024-49364 is fixed in 1.1.7. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2024-49364 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2024-49364 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2024-49364 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2024-49364? Upgrade
tiny-secp256k1to 1.1.7 or later.