CVE-2025-37824

CVE-2025-37824 is a medium-severity null pointer dereference vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tipc: fix NULL pointer...

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tipc: fix NULL pointer dereference in tipc_mon_reinit_self()

syzbot reported:

tipc: Node number set to 1055423674
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 6017 Comm: kworker/3:5 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc1-syzkaller-00246-g900241a5cc15 #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events tipc_net_finalize_work
RIP: 0010:tipc_mon_reinit_self+0x11c/0x210 net/tipc/monitor.c:719
...
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000356fb68 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000003ee87cba
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8dbc56a7 RDI: ffff88804c2cc010
RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000007
R13: fffffbfff2111097 R14: ffff88804ead8000 R15: ffff88804ead9010
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888097ab9000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00000000f720eb00 CR3: 000000000e182000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:

tipc_net_finalize+0x10b/0x180 net/tipc/net.c:140
process_one_work+0x9cc/0x1b70 kernel/workqueue.c:3238
process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3319 [inline]
worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf10 kernel/workqueue.c:3400
kthread+0x3c2/0x780 kernel/kthread.c:464
ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:153
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245

...
RIP: 0010:tipc_mon_reinit_self+0x11c/0x210 net/tipc/monitor.c:719
...
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000356fb68 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000003ee87cba
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8dbc56a7 RDI: ffff88804c2cc010
RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000007
R13: fffffbfff2111097 R14: ffff88804ead8000 R15: ffff88804ead9010
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888097ab9000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00000000f720eb00 CR3: 000000000e182000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400

There is a racing condition between workqueue created when enabling
bearer and another thread created when disabling bearer right after
that as follow:

enabling_bearer disabling_bearer
tipc_disc_timeout()
{ bearer_disable()
... {
schedule_work(&tn->work); tipc_mon_delete()
... {
} ...
                                     |   write_lock_bh(&mon->lock);
                                     |   mon->self = NULL;
                                     |   write_unlock_bh(&mon->lock);
                                     |   ...
                                     |  }

tipc_net_finalize_work() | }
{ |
... |
tipc_net_finalize() |
{ |
... |
tipc_mon_reinit_self() |
{ |
... |
write_lock_bh(&mon->lock); |
mon->self->addr = tipc_own_addr(net); |
write_unlock_bh(&mon->lock); |
...
---truncated---

Impact

The application dereferences a null pointer, causing a crash. Typical impact: denial of service via crash.

CVE-2025-37824 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.

Affected versions

Not available

Security releases

Not available

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Not available

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2025-37824? CVE-2025-37824 is a medium-severity null pointer dereference vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet. The application dereferences a null pointer, causing a crash.
  2. How severe is CVE-2025-37824? CVE-2025-37824 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2025-37824? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2025-37824 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
  4. Is CVE-2025-37824 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2025-37824 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2025-37824 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.