Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommu/tegra241-cmdqv: Fix...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommu/tegra241-cmdqv: Fix warnings due to dmam_free_coherent()
Two WARNINGs are observed when SMMU driver rolls back upon failure:
arm-smmu-v3.9.auto: Failed to register iommu
arm-smmu-v3.9.auto: probe with driver arm-smmu-v3 failed with error -22
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1 at kernel/dma/mapping.c:74 dmam_free_coherent+0xc0/0xd8
Call trace:
dmam_free_coherent+0xc0/0xd8 (P)
tegra241_vintf_free_lvcmdq+0x74/0x188
tegra241_cmdqv_remove_vintf+0x60/0x148
tegra241_cmdqv_remove+0x48/0xc8
arm_smmu_impl_remove+0x28/0x60
devm_action_release+0x1c/0x40
------------[ cut here ]------------
128 pages are still in use!
WARNING: CPU: 16 PID: 1 at mm/page_alloc.c:6902 free_contig_range+0x18c/0x1c8
Call trace:
free_contig_range+0x18c/0x1c8 (P)
cma_release+0x154/0x2f0
dma_free_contiguous+0x38/0xa0
dma_direct_free+0x10c/0x248
dma_free_attrs+0x100/0x290
dmam_free_coherent+0x78/0xd8
tegra241_vintf_free_lvcmdq+0x74/0x160
tegra241_cmdqv_remove+0x98/0x198
arm_smmu_impl_remove+0x28/0x60
devm_action_release+0x1c/0x40
This is because the LVCMDQ queue memory are managed by devres, while that
dmam_free_coherent() is called in the context of devm_action_release().
Jason pointed out that "arm_smmu_impl_probe() has mis-ordered the devres
callbacks if ops->device_remove() is going to be manually freeing things
that probe allocated":
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/[email protected]/
In fact, tegra241_cmdqv_init_structures() only allocates memory resources
which means any failure that it generates would be similar to -ENOMEM, so
there is no point in having that "falling back to standard SMMU" routine,
as the standard SMMU would likely fail to allocate memory too.
Remove the unwind part in tegra241_cmdqv_init_structures(), and return a
proper error code to ask SMMU driver to call tegra241_cmdqv_remove() via
impl_ops->device_remove(). Then, drop tegra241_vintf_free_lvcmdq() since
devres will take care of that.
Impact
CVE-2025-37837 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2025-37837? CVE-2025-37837 is a medium-severity security vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet.
- How severe is CVE-2025-37837? CVE-2025-37837 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2025-37837? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2025-37837 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2025-37837 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2025-37837 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2025-37837 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.