Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: LoongArch: Optimize module...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
LoongArch: Optimize module load time by optimizing PLT/GOT counting
When enabling CONFIG_KASAN, CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY_BUILD and
CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY at the same time, there will be soft deadlock,
the relevant logs are as follows:
rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
...
Call Trace:
[<900000000024f9e4>] show_stack+0x5c/0x180
[<90000000002482f4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x94/0xbc
[<9000000000224544>] rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0x1fc/0x280
[<900000000037ac80>] rcu_sched_clock_irq+0x720/0xf88
[<9000000000396c34>] update_process_times+0xb4/0x150
[<90000000003b2474>] tick_nohz_handler+0xf4/0x250
[<9000000000397e28>] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1d0/0x428
[<9000000000399b2c>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x214/0x538
[<9000000000253634>] constant_timer_interrupt+0x64/0x80
[<9000000000349938>] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x78/0x1a0
[<9000000000349a78>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x18/0x88
[<9000000000354c00>] handle_percpu_irq+0x90/0xf0
[<9000000000348c74>] handle_irq_desc+0x94/0xb8
[<9000000001012b28>] handle_cpu_irq+0x68/0xa0
[<9000000001def8c0>] handle_loongarch_irq+0x30/0x48
[<9000000001def958>] do_vint+0x80/0xd0
[<9000000000268a0c>] kasan_mem_to_shadow.part.0+0x2c/0x2a0
[<90000000006344f4>] __asan_load8+0x4c/0x120
[<900000000025c0d0>] module_frob_arch_sections+0x5c8/0x6b8
[<90000000003895f0>] load_module+0x9e0/0x2958
[<900000000038b770>] __do_sys_init_module+0x208/0x2d0
[<9000000001df0c34>] do_syscall+0x94/0x190
[<900000000024d6fc>] handle_syscall+0xbc/0x158
After analysis, this is because the slow speed of loading the amdgpu
module leads to the long time occupation of the cpu and then the soft
deadlock.
When loading a module, module_frob_arch_sections() tries to figure out
the number of PLTs/GOTs that will be needed to handle all the RELAs. It
will call the count_max_entries() to find in an out-of-order date which
counting algorithm has O(n^2) complexity.
To make it faster, we sort the relocation list by info and addend. That
way, to check for a duplicate relocation, it just needs to compare with
the previous entry. This reduces the complexity of the algorithm to O(n
log n), as done in commit d4e0340919fb ("arm64/module: Optimize module
load time by optimizing PLT counting"). This gives sinificant reduction
in module load time for modules with large number of relocations.
After applying this patch, the soft deadlock problem has been solved,
and the kernel starts normally without "Call Trace".
Using the default configuration to test some modules, the results are as
follows:
Module Size
ip_tables 36K
fat 143K
radeon 2.5MB
amdgpu 16MB
Without this patch:
Module Module load time (ms) Count(PLTs/GOTs)
ip_tables 18 59/6
fat 0 162/14
radeon 54 1221/84
amdgpu 1411 4525/1098
With this patch:
Module Module load time (ms) Count(PLTs/GOTs)
ip_tables 18 59/6
fat 0 162/14
radeon 22 1221/84
amdgpu 45 4525/1098
Impact
CVE-2025-39767 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2025-39767? CVE-2025-39767 is a medium-severity security vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet.
- How severe is CVE-2025-39767? CVE-2025-39767 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2025-39767? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2025-39767 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2025-39767 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2025-39767 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2025-39767 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.