Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: qed: Don't collect too many...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
qed: Don't collect too many protection override GRC elements
In the protection override dump path, the firmware can return far too
many GRC elements, resulting in attempting to write past the end of the
previously-kmalloc'ed dump buffer.
This will result in a kernel panic with reason:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ADDRESS
where "ADDRESS" is just past the end of the protection override dump
buffer. The start address of the buffer is:
p_hwfn->cdev->dbg_features[DBG_FEATURE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE].dump_buf
and the size of the buffer is buf_size in the same data structure.
The panic can be arrived at from either the qede Ethernet driver path:
[exception RIP: qed_grc_dump_addr_range+0x108]
qed_protection_override_dump at ffffffffc02662ed [qed]
qed_dbg_protection_override_dump at ffffffffc0267792 [qed]
qed_dbg_feature at ffffffffc026aa8f [qed]
qed_dbg_all_data at ffffffffc026b211 [qed]
qed_fw_fatal_reporter_dump at ffffffffc027298a [qed]
devlink_health_do_dump at ffffffff82497f61
devlink_health_report at ffffffff8249cf29
qed_report_fatal_error at ffffffffc0272baf [qed]
qede_sp_task at ffffffffc045ed32 [qede]
process_one_work at ffffffff81d19783
or the qedf storage driver path:
[exception RIP: qed_grc_dump_addr_range+0x108]
qed_protection_override_dump at ffffffffc068b2ed [qed]
qed_dbg_protection_override_dump at ffffffffc068c792 [qed]
qed_dbg_feature at ffffffffc068fa8f [qed]
qed_dbg_all_data at ffffffffc0690211 [qed]
qed_fw_fatal_reporter_dump at ffffffffc069798a [qed]
devlink_health_do_dump at ffffffff8aa95e51
devlink_health_report at ffffffff8aa9ae19
qed_report_fatal_error at ffffffffc0697baf [qed]
qed_hw_err_notify at ffffffffc06d32d7 [qed]
qed_spq_post at ffffffffc06b1011 [qed]
qed_fcoe_destroy_conn at ffffffffc06b2e91 [qed]
qedf_cleanup_fcport at ffffffffc05e7597 [qedf]
qedf_rport_event_handler at ffffffffc05e7bf7 [qedf]
fc_rport_work at ffffffffc02da715 [libfc]
process_one_work at ffffffff8a319663
Resolve this by clamping the firmware's return value to the maximum
number of legal elements the firmware should return.
Impact
CVE-2025-39949 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2025-39949? CVE-2025-39949 is a medium-severity security vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet.
- How severe is CVE-2025-39949? CVE-2025-39949 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2025-39949? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2025-39949 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2025-39949 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2025-39949 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2025-39949 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.