Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Add NULL...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Add NULL pointer checks in dc_stream cursor attribute functions
The function dc_stream_set_cursor_attributes() currently dereferences
the stream pointer and nested members stream->ctx->dc->current_state
without checking for NULL.
All callers of these functions, such as indcn30_apply_idle_power_optimizations() andamdgpu_dm_plane_handle_cursor_update(), already perform NULL checks
before calling these functions.
Fixes below:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_stream.c:336 dc_stream_program_cursor_attributes()
error: we previously assumed 'stream' could be null (see line 334)
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_stream.c
327 bool dc_stream_program_cursor_attributes(
328 struct dc_stream_state *stream,
329 const struct dc_cursor_attributes *attributes)
330 {
331 struct dc *dc;
332 bool reset_idle_optimizations = false;
333
334 dc = stream ? stream->ctx->dc : NULL;
^^^^^^
The old code assumed stream could be NULL.
335
--> 336 if (dc_stream_set_cursor_attributes(stream, attributes)) {
^^^^^^
The refactor added an unchecked dereference.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_stream.c
313 bool dc_stream_set_cursor_attributes(
314 struct dc_stream_state *stream,
315 const struct dc_cursor_attributes *attributes)
316 {
317 bool result = false;
318
319 if (dc_stream_check_cursor_attributes(stream, stream->ctx->dc->current_state, attributes)) {
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Here.
This function used to check for if stream as NULL and return false at
the start. Probably we should add that back.
Impact
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2025-40148? CVE-2025-40148 is a unknown-severity security vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2025-40148? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2025-40148 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2025-40148 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2025-40148 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2025-40148 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.