Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5: Clean up only new...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: Clean up only new IRQ glue on request_irq() failure
The mlx5_irq_alloc() function can inadvertently free the entire rmap
and end up in a crash[1] when the other threads tries to access this,
when request_irq() fails due to exhausted IRQ vectors. This commit
modifies the cleanup to remove only the specific IRQ mapping that was
just added.
This prevents removal of other valid mappings and ensures precise
cleanup of the failed IRQ allocation's associated glue object.
Note: This error is observed when both fwctl and rds configs are enabled.
[1]
mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: Successfully registered panic handler for port 1
mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 66740): Failed to
request irq. err = -28
infiniband mlx5_0: mlx5_ib_test_wc:290:(pid 66740): Error -28 while
trying to test write-combining support
mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: Successfully unregistered panic handler for port 1
mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: Successfully registered panic handler for port 1
mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 66740): Failed to
request irq. err = -28
infiniband mlx5_0: mlx5_ib_test_wc:290:(pid 66740): Error -28 while
trying to test write-combining support
mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: Successfully unregistered panic handler for port 1
mlx5_core 0000:03:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 28895): Failed to
request irq. err = -28
mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 28895): Failed to
request irq. err = -28
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
0xe277a58fde16f291: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
RIP: 0010:free_irq_cpu_rmap+0x23/0x7d
Call Trace:
? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d6/0x2f9
? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d6/0x2f9
? mlx5_irq_alloc.cold+0x5d/0xf3 [mlx5_core]
? __die_body.cold+0x8/0xa
? die_addr+0x39/0x53
? exc_general_protection+0x1c4/0x3e9
? dev_vprintk_emit+0x5f/0x90
? asm_exc_general_protection+0x22/0x27
? free_irq_cpu_rmap+0x23/0x7d
mlx5_irq_alloc.cold+0x5d/0xf3 [mlx5_core]
irq_pool_request_vector+0x7d/0x90 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_irq_request+0x2e/0xe0 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_irq_request_vector+0xad/0xf7 [mlx5_core]
comp_irq_request_pci+0x64/0xf0 [mlx5_core]
create_comp_eq+0x71/0x385 [mlx5_core]
? mlx5e_open_xdpsq+0x11c/0x230 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_comp_eqn_get+0x72/0x90 [mlx5_core]
? xas_load+0x8/0x91
mlx5_comp_irqn_get+0x40/0x90 [mlx5_core]
mlx5e_open_channel+0x7d/0x3c7 [mlx5_core]
mlx5e_open_channels+0xad/0x250 [mlx5_core]
mlx5e_open_locked+0x3e/0x110 [mlx5_core]
mlx5e_open+0x23/0x70 [mlx5_core]
__dev_open+0xf1/0x1a5
__dev_change_flags+0x1e1/0x249
dev_change_flags+0x21/0x5c
do_setlink+0x28b/0xcc4
? __nla_parse+0x22/0x3d
? inet6_validate_link_af+0x6b/0x108
? cpumask_next+0x1f/0x35
? __snmp6_fill_stats64.constprop.0+0x66/0x107
? __nla_validate_parse+0x48/0x1e6
__rtnl_newlink+0x5ff/0xa57
? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x164/0x2ce
rtnl_newlink+0x44/0x6e
rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x2bb/0x362
? __netlink_sendskb+0x4c/0x6c
? netlink_unicast+0x28f/0x2ce
? rtnl_calcit.isra.0+0x150/0x146
netlink_rcv_skb+0x5f/0x112
netlink_unicast+0x213/0x2ce
netlink_sendmsg+0x24f/0x4d9
__sock_sendmsg+0x65/0x6a
____sys_sendmsg+0x28f/0x2c9
? import_iovec+0x17/0x2b
___sys_sendmsg+0x97/0xe0
__sys_sendmsg+0x81/0xd8
do_syscall_64+0x35/0x87
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x0
RIP: 0033:0x7fc328603727
Code: c3 66 90 41 54 41 89 d4 55 48 89 f5 53 89 fb 48 83 ec 10 e8 0b ed
ff ff 44 89 e2 48 89 ee 89 df 41 89 c0 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00
f0 ff ff 77 35 44 89 c7 48 89 44 24 08 e8 44 ed ff ff 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffe8eb3f1a0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000d RCX: 00007fc328603727
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffe8eb3f1f0 RDI: 000000000000000d
RBP: 00007ffe8eb3f1f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00000000000
---truncated---
Impact
CVE-2025-40250 has a CVSS score of 7.8 (High). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2025-40250? CVE-2025-40250 is a high-severity security vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet.
- How severe is CVE-2025-40250? CVE-2025-40250 has a CVSS score of 7.8 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2025-40250? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2025-40250 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2025-40250 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2025-40250 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2025-40250 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.