Summary
kin-openapi spec loader panics on a self-referential additionalProperties $ref (nil-pointer DoS)
The defect
Confirmed at HEAD (f0407d5, v0.144.0). openapi3/loader.go, inside resolveComponent's drill closure (around line 455), the case *SchemaRef branch for pathPart == "additionalProperties" dereferences c.Value.AdditionalProperties with no nil-check on c.Value:
case *SchemaRef:
if pathPart == "additionalProperties" {
if ap := c.Value.AdditionalProperties.Has; ap != nil { // c.Value can be nil here
cursor = *ap
} else {
cursor = c.Value.AdditionalProperties.Schema
}
attempted = true
}
When a $ref fragment drills through .../additionalProperties of a schema whose Value is still nil (a pure, not-yet-resolved $ref, or a self-reference resolved before its own Value is set), c.Value is nil and the .AdditionalProperties access panics.
Input and attacker
A tiny crafted OpenAPI document, one schema, no external refs, no network:
openapi: 3.0.3
info: {title: t, version: "1.0.0"}
paths: {}
components:
schemas:
A:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/A/additionalProperties'
Attacker model: any service or tool that loads an untrusted spec via the default openapi3.Loader (LoadFromData / LoadFromFile / LoadFromURI), e.g. a spec registry, an API-management platform ingesting user specs, a linter, or a converter. It crashes during LOAD (ResolveRefsIn), before Validate.
Verification level
EXECUTED with negative controls (agent-run go test at HEAD f0407d5, including yesterday's security merge; the bug is still present). The full stack pins LoadFromData:196 -> ResolveRefsIn:274 -> resolveSchemaRef:1048 -> resolveComponent:485 -> drill:439 -> :455, propagating to main(); no recover() in loader.go/schema.go (grep + trace). Two negative controls stay clean: drilling additionalProperties of a resolved schema loads fine (the existing TestIssue376 happy path), and a normal recursive schema loads fine, so the nil Value is specifically the cause. I independently re-confirmed at HEAD that loader.go:455 dereferences c.Value.AdditionalProperties with no nil-check on c.Value. NOT verified: I did not enumerate every consumer's recover posture.
Suggested fix
Add if c.Value == nil { break } (fall through to the nil-safe drillIntoField) before touching c.Value.AdditionalProperties. One line.
Also cleared (stated, not claimed)
The allOf/anyOf $ref diamond does not blow up: Schema.validate threads its stack through the return and never pops it, acting as a global pointer-keyed visited-set (executed N=10..30, microseconds). External-ref SSRF/path-traversal is blocked by default (IsExternalRefsAllowed=false); the known custom-ReadFromURIFunc bypass is the already-banked downstream oasdiff item.
Advisory-source note
Five-source enumeration: every kin-openapi advisory (CVE-2025-30153 plus the five fresh July-2026 GHSAs) is in openapi3filter (request validation); this finding is in the openapi3 loader, untouched by that systematic reporter and flagged un-analyzed by the prior oasdiff scout. Not contested on the loader surface as of today (a systematic hunter could pivot, so it decays; submit reasonably promptly).
Dedup
Dedup gate clean: no kin-openapi loader verdict in COVERED-INDEX, DISCLOSURE-INDEX or SCOUT-EXCLUDE (the one DISCLOSURE-INDEX hit is report #313, the downstream oasdiff, a different repo/lane).
Tooling
AI assistance was used while investigating. The panic is executed-verified with negative controls (a one-schema self-referential additionalProperties $ref crashes LoadFromData while a resolved additionalProperties and a normal recursive schema load fine), and I confirmed at HEAD that loader.go:455 dereferences c.Value.AdditionalProperties with no nil-check on c.Value, on a load path with no recover.
Impact
The application dereferences a null pointer, causing a crash. Typical impact: denial of service via crash.
CVE-2026-100348 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.145.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-100348? CVE-2026-100348 is a medium-severity null pointer dereference vulnerability in github.com/getkin/kin-openapi (go), affecting versions <= 0.144.0. It is fixed in 0.145.0. The application dereferences a null pointer, causing a crash.
- How severe is CVE-2026-100348? CVE-2026-100348 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of github.com/getkin/kin-openapi are affected by CVE-2026-100348? github.com/getkin/kin-openapi (go) versions <= 0.144.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-100348? Yes. CVE-2026-100348 is fixed in 0.145.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-100348 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-100348 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-100348 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-100348? Upgrade
github.com/getkin/kin-openapito 0.145.0 or later.