CVE-2026-103929

CVE-2026-103929 is a high-severity OS command injection vulnerability in mise (rust), affecting versions <= 2026.7.13. It is fixed in 2026.7.14.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

mise permits untrusted local configuration to override default shell arguments

Untrusted local .mise.toml [settings] can set the shell interpreter args (unix/windows default_inline / default_file shell_args), yielding arbitrary command execution, because those command-interpreter settings were not added to the global_only denylist the CVE-2026-55448 fix relies on. Code execution from an untrusted repository with no trust prompt for the malicious file, on par with the patched CVE. Confirmed at HEAD 7160170206782fdd3ef287c8302369e32152fb71.

The defect

CVE-2026-55448 and CVE-2026-35533 fixed the fact that a local project [settings] table is harvested by the settings preloader independent of the trust store (an untrusted .mise.toml sets settings without the user ever trusting it). The remediation is a per-field global_only denylist: settings marked global_only are stripped from non-global config. The maintainers marked the command-execution fields they knew about (the three forge credential_command values) but did not mark the four shell-interpreter-args settings, which are also command-execution settings because they choose the interpreter for every command mise spawns.

The global_only denylist and the gap. In settings.toml, the three credential_command sinks are global_only (forgejo.credential_command around line 775, github.credential_command around 828, gitlab.credential_command around 990). The four shell-args settings do not carry global_only:

  • unix_default_file_shell_args (settings.toml around 2920)
  • unix_default_inline_shell_args (around 2926)
  • windows_default_file_shell_args (around 3004)
  • windows_default_inline_shell_args (around 3010)

The strip logic only removes global_only keys. src/config/settings.rs strip_local_only_settings (line 409) filters by meta.global_only (line 416: filter_map(|(key, meta)| meta.global_only.then_some(*key))), so any field not marked global_only survives from a local untrusted config. The settings preload loads every config path including the local project file (all_settings_files, line 778), and in default (non-safe) mode there is no trust check (safe_mode defaults false, line 1141).

The sink. src/config/settings.rs default_inline_shell (line 1032) reads self.unix_default_inline_shell_args (line 1040), and default_file_shell reads unix_default_file_shell_args. Settings::get returns the merged global-plus-local value minus global_only, so the untrusted project value overrides the built-in default (sh -c -o errexit).

Injection semantics. The real command is appended after the attacker's args, so PAYLOAD runs and the real command is demoted to $0:

  • tera inline exec builtin: src/tera.rs (tera1_exec around 1358, and around 1470) builds shell[1..] + [command] with program = shell[0]. An attacker unix_default_inline_shell_args = "sh -c 'PAYLOAD'" yields sh -c 'PAYLOAD' .
  • postinstall runner: src/backend/mod.rs around 2405 calls cmd_body_args(shell_args, body); src/cmd.rs cmd_body_args (non-Windows, around 520) returns program flags... body, the same demotion.
  • task execution: src/task/task_executor.rs (around 916, 939, 993) uses task.shell()?.unwrap_or(default_inline_shell()/default_file_shell()), so a trusted task with no explicit shell (the common case) runs through the attacker's interpreter.
  • hooks: src/hooks.rs (around 540, 603) also fall back to default_inline_shell().

Attacker model and reachability

An untrusted repository the developer clones and cd's into. The attacker's .mise.toml sits in the working directory or any ancestor and is never trusted by the victim; its [settings] table is harvested by the preloader independent of the trust store, exactly as the two prior CVEs established. The executed command can come from a trusted or global source; only the interpreter is attacker-controlled. Any of these, run while the untrusted .mise.toml is in an ancestor directory, fires it: mise run for a task defined in the global config or a trusted parent repo (inline run, no explicit shell); mise install of any tool with a postinstall directive; any tera template that calls exec(...) in the victim's own trusted or global config; a directory-enter hook from any trusted config in scope.

Proof of concept. In an untrusted repo, .mise.toml:

[settings]
unix_default_inline_shell_args = "sh -c 'id > /tmp/mise_pwned'"

The victim cd's in (does not trust the file) and later runs any global or trusted-parent task with no explicit shell, or mise install of a tool with a postinstall, or a config that renders {{ exec(...) }}. mise builds sh -c 'id > /tmp/mise_pwned' <realcommand>, so the payload runs.

Verification

Source-verified at HEAD: the four shell-args settings lack global_only while the credential_command sinks have it, strip_local_only_settings removes only global_only keys, default_inline_shell reads the setting, and the exec/postinstall/task paths append the real command after the attacker args. The load path is the same one two shipped CVEs already proved reachable. I did not run mise end to end.

Tooling

AI assistance was used while investigating, but the researcher read strip_local_only_settings (confirming it strips only global_only), the settings.toml entries (confirming the four shell-args settings lack global_only while credential_command has it), default_inline_shell (confirming it reads the setting), and the exec/postinstall/task invocation sites (confirming the real command is appended after the attacker args) themself at HEAD, so the incomplete fix is source-verified.

Impact

Untrusted input reaches a shell command, allowing arbitrary commands to run on the host. Typical impact: code execution in the application's environment.

CVE-2026-103929 has a CVSS score of 7.8 (High). The vector is requires local access, no privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2026.7.14); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

mise (<= 2026.7.13)

Security releases

mise → 2026.7.14 (rust)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Mark all four default_shell_args settings global_only = true (the same treatment as credential_command), or flip the default-mode policy to an allowlist so any setting not explicitly known-safe is stripped from non-global config.

Secondary note (weaker, not the main finding): the CVE-2026-54557 path-sanitization fix added sanitize_install_version_name only inside the HTTP backend (src/backend/http.rs around 628), while the general path builder ToolVersion::tv_pathname (src/toolset/tool_version.rs around 292) still only replaces ':' and '/' and does not neutralize '..' or backslash. Impact is narrow (one level up, stays in the mise data dir on Unix), so this is a hardening note, not a primary finding.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-103929? CVE-2026-103929 is a high-severity OS command injection vulnerability in mise (rust), affecting versions <= 2026.7.13. It is fixed in 2026.7.14. Untrusted input reaches a shell command, allowing arbitrary commands to run on the host.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-103929? CVE-2026-103929 has a CVSS score of 7.8 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of mise are affected by CVE-2026-103929? mise (rust) versions <= 2026.7.13 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-103929? Yes. CVE-2026-103929 is fixed in 2026.7.14. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-103929 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-103929 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-103929 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-103929? Upgrade mise to 2026.7.14 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in mise

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.