CVE-2026-106118

CVE-2026-106118 is a high-severity out-of-bounds write vulnerability in SixLabors.ImageSharp (nuget), affecting versions >= 3.0.0, < 3.2.0. It is fixed in 3.2.0, 4.1.1.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

ImageSharp: Tiled fax TIFF: tile buffer sized by TileWidth but fax decompressor writes scanlines of ImageWidth, heap OOB write

When decoding a tiled TIFF with fax compression (T4/T6/MH), DecodeTilesChunky allocates each tile buffer from TileWidth (ceil(TileWidth*bpp/8)*TileLength bytes) but constructs the fax decompressor with frame.Width: TiffDecompressorsFactory ignores the isTiled/tileWidth/tileHeight parameters entirely. The T4/T6/MH decompressors treat the full image width as the scanline length and advance (and really write, via read-modify-write bit ops) frame.Width bits per row, with no bounds check against the tile buffer. The very first tile therefore writes linearly out of bounds, about ImageWidth/8 bytes per row × TileLength rows into a TileWidth-sized buffer. With ImageWidth=4,000,000, TileWidth=16, TileLength=16 this writes ~2 MB past a 32-byte buffer and kills the process deterministically; a T6 all-white variant advances the bit offset by >512 MB silently, showing an alarm-free heap-corruption window for the same defect. A crafted file fully controls the OOB length per tile and works with perfectly legal per-row run codes (no overlong runs needed).

Verified at commit 5cd4d0d26a82a9549f297a237aea9cf665bddff8 (main; latest release v4.1.0, the supported major).

Details

Root cause: a size mismatch between tile buffer allocation and decompressor width, because the factory drops the tile parameters.

  • Allocation: TiffDecoderCore.cs#L792-L794, bytesPerTileRow = RoundUpToMultipleOfEight(tileWidth*bitsPerPixel); tile buffer = bytesPerTileRow*tileLength bytes (32 bytes in the PoC)
  • Mismatch: TiffDecoderCore.cs#L797, CreateDecompressor<TPixel>(frame.Width, ..., isTiled: true, tileWidth, tileLength) passes the full frame width
  • Factory drops tile params: TiffDecompressorsFactory.cs#L56-L64, T4/T6/MH decompressors receive only width (= frame.Width); isTiled/tileWidth/tileHeight ignored
  • OOB write sink: T4TiffCompression.cs#L69-L119, T6TiffCompression.cs#L76-L108, per-row advance of this.width bits via BitWriterUtils.WriteBits with no buffer-length check (BitWriterUtils.cs#L51); note TiffDecoderCore.cs:829-831 later reads the buffer in bytesPerTileRow strides, confirming the protocol expects tile-width rows

Attack surface: Image.Load(stream) on an attacker-supplied tiled TIFF (TiffDecoderCore.DecodeImageWithTiles → DecodeTilesChunky). Default configuration; only requirement is a standard tiled TIFF header (TileWidth=16, TileLength=16) + Compression=3 (T4; T6 also constructible).

Suggested remediation:

  1. Short-term: when isTiled, construct the T4/T6/MH decompressor with tileWidth (not frame width), or clip row writes to the caller-provided buffer length.
  2. Root fix: bound the write side of BitWriterUtils (pass remaining bits), and validate every fax row advance against buffer capacity on both tiled and strip paths.
  3. Regression tests: Compression=2/3/4 × tiled with TileWidth < ImageWidth, including a T6 black-pixel row (forces real WriteBit).

PoC

Full PoC posted as the first comment below: Program.cs (driver), poc-tiled-t4.tif (crafted file, ~9.8 KB, base64 inline), README.

  1. Build a small console project referencing src/ImageSharp/ImageSharp.csproj and run it against the crafted file (or call Image.Load on it from any host).

  2. Observed with ImageWidth=4,000,000, TileWidth=16, TileLength=16, T4 with 400 makeup codes + EOL per row:

    tile payload 9642 bytes; rows write ~2,048,000 bytes into a 32-byte buffer
    Fatal error. System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory.
       at SixLabors.ImageSharp.Formats.Tiff.Compression.BitWriterUtils.WriteBits(Span`1<Byte>, IntPtr, IntPtr, Byte)
       at ...T4TiffCompression.WritePixelRun(...)
       at ...T4TiffCompression.Decompress(...)
    Aborted (core dumped); exit=134
    
  3. Controls: the same file with Compression=None decodes normally (container is fine); a T6 all-white-rows variant advances >512 MB of bit offset without a real write (silent corruption window) before tripping on a directory-level TileOffsets count check.

Impact

  • What it is: out-of-bounds write (CWE-787). For any service decoding untrusted tiled TIFFs: remote, default-configuration, deterministic process crash (DoS), plus a heap OOB write whose per-tile length and row width are attacker-tunable, a potential code-execution surface. This is a vulnerability in the library itself, in scope of your SECURITY.md.
  • Who is impacted: applications decoding untrusted TIFF with SixLabors.ImageSharp at the current major (verified on main past v4.1.0); tiled + fax-compressed files are the trigger, which ordinary TIFF writers can produce.

Reported by Kimi Security Team ([email protected]).

A write operation targets a memory location beyond the intended buffer boundary. Typical impact: memory corruption, crash, or arbitrary code execution.

CVE-2026-106118 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.2.0, 4.1.1); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

SixLabors.ImageSharp (>= 3.0.0, < 3.2.0) SixLabors.ImageSharp (>= 4.0.0, < 4.1.1)

Security releases

SixLabors.ImageSharp → 3.2.0 (nuget) SixLabors.ImageSharp → 4.1.1 (nuget)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade the following packages to resolve this vulnerability:

SixLabors.ImageSharp to 3.2.0 or later; SixLabors.ImageSharp to 4.1.1 or later

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-106118? CVE-2026-106118 is a high-severity out-of-bounds write vulnerability in SixLabors.ImageSharp (nuget), affecting versions >= 3.0.0, < 3.2.0. It is fixed in 3.2.0, 4.1.1. A write operation targets a memory location beyond the intended buffer boundary.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-106118? CVE-2026-106118 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of SixLabors.ImageSharp are affected by CVE-2026-106118? SixLabors.ImageSharp (nuget) versions >= 3.0.0, < 3.2.0 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-106118? Yes. CVE-2026-106118 is fixed in 3.2.0, 4.1.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-106118 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-106118 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-106118 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-106118?
    • Upgrade SixLabors.ImageSharp to 3.2.0 or later
    • Upgrade SixLabors.ImageSharp to 4.1.1 or later

Other vulnerabilities in SixLabors.ImageSharp

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.