Summary
datamodel-code-generator: Protobuf weak-import path traversal allows files to be written outside the temporary directory
When processing an attacker-controlled Protobuf schema, vulnerable versions ofdatamodel-code-generator could write a generated weak-import stub outside the
intended __weak_imports__ temporary directory. Absolute import paths and relative
paths containing .. could escape this directory.
An attacker could create directories and new files at locations writable by the
process. Relative path traversal could also overwrite existing writable files
because the existence check and the stub write used different base directories.
An existing absolute target was skipped by the existence check.
Written content was limited to a generated Protobuf syntax declaration,syntax = "proto2"; or syntax = "proto3";, followed by a newline. This issue did
not provide fully attacker-controlled file contents, and direct arbitrary code
execution has not been demonstrated.
These filesystem side effects occurred before protoc ran. A subsequent
compilation error did not undo them. A user or CI job must process the
attacker-controlled schema for the issue to be triggered, whether the schema is
supplied as a local file or fetched via --url.
The fix has been merged into the parent repository's main branch in
5e94b8f. A patched package release is not yet available.
The technical details and PoC below describe the vulnerable implementation before
that fix.
Affected component
- Repository:
datamodel-code-generator/datamodel-code-generator(formerlykoxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator). - Analyzed at: released 0.80.0 (
pip install datamodel-code-generator==0.80.0) andmain@ commit834731d56c0a90c182a0919f316069cf5ff0659a(2026-09-13). Both contained the identical vulnerable sink. - Sink / entry point (
src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/protobuf.py, line numbers from 0.80.0):- Source:
WEAK_IMPORT_PATTERN(protobuf.py:37), attacker-controlled capture group. - Sink:
_write_missing_weak_imports(protobuf.py:391-393),weak_import_dir / import_path+mkdir(parents=True)+write_text. - Timing: called from
_ProtoInputPreparer.__enter__(protobuf.py:333), beforeprotoc.main(...)runs inside thewithbody.
- Source:
- Preconditions: victim runs the tool (CLI or Python API) with
--input-file-type protobufon an attacker-controlled.proto, supplied as a local file (--input) or a remote URL (--url). Requires thegrpcio-toolspackage (Protobuf support). The attacker does not need privileges on the affected system; filesystem effects are limited to locations writable by the code-generation process.
Severity
Proposed: High. CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N = 7.5.
- Scored to match the project's own rating of the sibling path-traversal advisories CVE-2026-55389 / CVE-2026-55390, both
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N= 7.5. This finding is the same attack surface (unvalidated path from a processed schema) with the impact moved from confidentiality (read) to integrity (write), henceC:N/I:H. AV:N: the malicious schema can be fetched over the network via--url, consistent with how the siblings were scored.I:H: attacker fully controls the write path and can create arbitrary directory trees and overwrite existing files; only the file content is constrained (a fixedsyntax = "proto{2,3}";line).A:Nchosen conservatively; overwriting build-critical files (lock files,__init__.py, entry points) can cause availability loss, which would argueA:L.- Honest alternative: if the reviewer treats "the victim must run the tool on the file" as user interaction (
UI:R), the score is 6.5 (Moderate). The project usedUI:Nfor the identical read-path siblings, soUI:Nis used here for consistency.
Details
Source pattern, the imported path is captured with no character restriction:
# protobuf.py:37
WEAK_IMPORT_PATTERN = re.compile(r'^\s*import\s+weak\s+"([^"]+)"\s*;', re.MULTILINE)
Sink, the captured path is joined and written with no boundary check:
# protobuf.py:383-393 (_write_missing_weak_imports)
for import_path in WEAK_IMPORT_PATTERN.findall(text):
if any((include_path / import_path).exists() for include_path in include_paths):
continue
stub = self.weak_import_dir / import_path # no resolve(), no is_relative_to()
stub.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) # arbitrary directory tree
stub.write_text(syntax, encoding=self.parser.encoding)
Two escape mechanisms, both from pathlib's / semantics:
- Absolute path:
Path(".../__weak_imports__") / "/etc/x"==/etc/x(an absolute
right operand replaces the base). Creates new files anywhere the process can write. ../traversal:Path(".../__weak_imports__") / "../../x"climbs out of the
temp directory.
Why the existence guard (line 389) does not protect the write: it checksinclude_path / import_path, using a different base (include_paths) than the
actual write, which uses self.weak_import_dir / import_path. For a relative
path the two bases resolve to different directories, so the guard checks a location
that is not the real write target and misses it, enabling overwrite of existing
files. (For an absolute path the guard and the write coincide, so an already-
existing absolute target is skipped; absolute paths thus create new files but do not
overwrite. Overwrite is reached via the relative-traversal path.)
Timing: _write_missing_weak_imports runs inside __enter__ (line 333), andprotoc.main(...) runs later in the with body. protoc rejects the malformed
virtual path (Backslashes, consecutive slashes, "." or ".." are not allowed in the virtual path) and the overall command exits non-zero, but the file has
already been written; the filesystem side effect is not rolled back.
Attack path
- Attacker crafts
evil.protocontaining e.g.import weak "/home/victim/.config/x";
and/orimport weak "../../overwrite_me.txt";, and gets the victim to process it
(third-party schema, or--urlto an attacker-hosted file). _write_missing_weak_importswrites the stub to the attacker-chosen path,
creating any intermediate directories and overwriting an existing file (relative
case).protocthen fails, but the file(s) are already on disk.
Proof of Concept
Two self-contained scripts (poc/reproduce.sh for --input, poc/reproduce-url.sh
for --url) install the released datamodel-code-generator==0.80.0, serve/point a
malicious .proto, and assert the writes. The PoC drives the released package
unmodified; the sink file's sha256 is recorded in REPRODUCE.md.
Local --input run against 0.80.0, real output:
[*] installed version: 0.80.0
[test A] absolute-path arbitrary file + mkdir(parents):
[PASS] new file created at attacker-controlled absolute path
[PASS] content is the fixed syntax stub
[test B] relative-traversal overwrite of pre-existing file:
[PASS] pre-existing victim.txt content was overwritten
[PASS] victim.txt now holds the injected stub
==================== RESULT: 4 passed, 0 failed ====================
Remote --url run against 0.80.0, real output (proto served over HTTP, then the
same writes fire):
[*] serving malicious proto at http://127.0.0.1:<port>/evil_url.proto
[PASS] server actually served the proto (HTTP 200)
[PASS] absolute-path arbitrary file created
[PASS] pre-existing victim overwritten via ../
==================== RESULT: 3 passed, 0 failed ====================
Resolution
The fix was merged into the parent repository's main branch in
5e94b8f.
The Protobuf input preparer now resolves the dedicated temporary weak-import
directory and each candidate stub path. If a resolved candidate is outside that
directory, it raises SchemaParseError before checking include paths, creating
parent directories, or writing the stub. The containment check rejects
absolute-path escapes and relative .. traversal that would leave the sandbox.
Input-preparation failures also immediately clean up the temporary directory.
Regression tests cover:
- rejection of absolute weak-import paths outside the sandbox;
- rejection of relative
..traversal outside the sandbox; - preservation of a pre-existing file outside the sandbox.
Local tox validation of the patch passed across the Python 3.10–3.14 and formatter
matrix, the CI compatibility environments, and the repository checks. Combined
line and branch coverage, including the changed files, reached 100%.
A fixed package has not yet been published to PyPI; the latest published version
at the time of this update is 0.80.0. Patched versions remains unset until a
release containing this fix is available. The advisory remains private pending
that release.
References
- GHSA-8359-h9fx-j6v9 / CVE-2026-55389, datamodel-code-generator arbitrary local file read via JSON-Schema
$refpath traversal (CWE-22/200/610, 7.5, patched 0.62.0). Same class, read primitive; sibling entry point. - GHSA-442q-2j6p-642g / CVE-2026-55390, datamodel-code-generator arbitrary local file read via XSD
schemaLocationpath traversal (CWE-22/200/610, 7.5, affected>= 0.59.0, <= 0.61.0, patched 0.62.0). Same class, read primitive; the fix sweep that missed the Protobuf entry point. - Python
pathlib,PurePath.__truediv__: an absolute right-hand operand discards the left operand;..segments are not normalized. (https://docs.python.org/3/library/pathlib.html)
Discovery
Found via source review and a reproducing PoC ondatamodel-code-generator/datamodel-code-generator, released 0.80.0 and main @834731d56c0a90c182a0919f316069cf5ff0659a, 2026-09.
Impact
Any user or CI pipeline that runs an affected version ofdatamodel-code-generator on an untrusted
Protobuf schema (a downloaded third-party .proto, or --url to a remote source)
is exposed to arbitrary file/directory creation and overwrite by the schema author,
with the process's own permissions. Concrete harms:
- Overwrite source, config,
.env, lock files, or__init__.py/ entry-point
files → project corruption, broken builds, denial of service. - Create arbitrary directory trees / drop files into watched or auto-loaded
locations.
Direct arbitrary code execution has not been demonstrated. The written content
is limited to a generated syntax = "proto2"; or syntax = "proto3"; line and is
not fully attacker-controlled.
Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files. Typical impact: unauthorized file read or write outside the intended directory.
CVE-2026-107377 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.81.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-107377? CVE-2026-107377 is a high-severity path traversal vulnerability in datamodel-code-generator (pip), affecting versions >= 0.59.0, <= 0.80.0. It is fixed in 0.81.0. Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files.
- How severe is CVE-2026-107377? CVE-2026-107377 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of datamodel-code-generator are affected by CVE-2026-107377? datamodel-code-generator (pip) versions >= 0.59.0, <= 0.80.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-107377? Yes. CVE-2026-107377 is fixed in 0.81.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-107377 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-107377 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-107377 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-107377? Upgrade
datamodel-code-generatorto 0.81.0 or later.