Summary
Pillow: ReDoS in XbmImagePlugin: 512-byte file stalls Image.open() for minutes
============================================================================
ReDoS in XbmImagePlugin: 512-byte file stalls Image.open() for minutes
Location: src/PIL/XbmImagePlugin.py:58 in XbmImageFile._open()
Commit: a707c6b21c313880d0771e54965d142dd42358b6
============================================================================
A crafted 512-byte file makes Pillow's Image.open() spend about six minutes of processor time on one core before it gives up with UnidentifiedImageError. Anyone who can hand bytes to an application that opens images with Pillow's default settings can trigger this, for example through an upload form, a thumbnailer, or a service that checks whether a blob is an image. A few such files sent at once can tie up a typical pool of worker processes.
The cause is the xbm_head regular expression in src/PIL/XbmImagePlugin.py:32-40, which XbmImageFile._open() (line 58) runs over the first 512 bytes of any stream whose prefix starts with #define. Several adjacent parts of the pattern can match the same characters. [ \t]+ overlaps with .* in the width and height lines and with [^_]* in the optional hotspot lines, and [\r\n]+ closing the hotspot group overlaps with the following [\000-\377]*. The header sets a run of k spaces after each #define and a run of k line terminators after _y_hot, then omits the [] after _bits. That forces Python's backtracking matcher to try every way of splitting those runs and rescan the remaining bytes each time. The cost grows roughly as k to the fifth power: k = 60 measured 375 s, while a well-formed XBM of the same size opens in about 40 ms. Because this happens before any format is identified, none of Pillow's size, pixel-count or decompression-bomb limits apply, and upload size limits do not help because the file is tiny. ImageFile.Parser.feed() repeats the cost on every chunk until the stream is identified. The only existing mitigation is passing a formats= allowlist that excludes "XBM".
The attached reproducer opens the same header with and without the trailing []. The valid version opens as XBM in 52 ms. The broken version takes 0.1 s, 0.75 s, 3.0 s and 8.6 s at k = 10, 15, 20 and 25, and the slow k = 60 case is not run. This is the same class of bug as CVE-2021-25292 in PdfParser, but in a different plugin and reachable from plain Image.open().
Details
XbmImageFile._open() identifies an XBM file by running the module-level regex xbm_head over the first 512 bytes of the stream. The pattern has several adjacent quantifier pairs that can consume the same characters, followed by a [\000-\377]*_bits\[] tail that rescans the rest of the buffer for every way of splitting them. A 512-byte input built to exercise all of them and then fail the final literal keeps Image.open() in xbm_head.match() for minutes before it raises UnidentifiedImageError.
This 512-byte input (k = 60) takes 375 s of CPU in Image.open(io.BytesIO(data)) with default settings, measured on the stock build at this commit:
k = 60
data = b"#define" + b" "*k + b"_width 1\r"
data += b"#define" + b" "*k + b"_height 1\r"
data += b"#define" + b" "*k + b"_x_hot 1\r"
data += b"#define" + b" "*k + b"_y_hot 1" + b"\r"*k
data += b"_bits" # no "[]": the final literal never matches
data += b"A" * (512 - len(data)) # pad to the 512 bytes _open() reads
Calling XbmImagePlugin.xbm_head.match(data) directly gives the same picture: k = 10 → 0.11 s, k = 15 → 0.76 s, k = 20 → 3.0 s, k = 25 → 8.5 s, k = 30 → 19.9 s (roughly ×27 per doubling of k, i.e. about k^4.7). A well-formed 512-byte XBM matches in 10 µs and opens and loads through Image.open() in ~40 ms including plugin import; the same k = 60 header with _bits[] present matches in 5 µs.
The regex, src/PIL/XbmImagePlugin.py:32:
xbm_head = re.compile(
rb"\s*#define[ \t]+.*_width[ \t]+(?P<width>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
b"#define[ \t]+.*_height[ \t]+(?P<height>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
b"(?P<hotspot>"
b"#define[ \t]+[^_]*_x_hot[ \t]+(?P<xhot>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
b"#define[ \t]+[^_]*_y_hot[ \t]+(?P<yhot>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
b")?"
rb"[\000-\377]*_bits\[]"
)
and the only call site, src/PIL/XbmImagePlugin.py:58:
def _open(self) -> None:
…
m = xbm_head.match(self.fp.read(512))
if not m:
msg = "not a XBM file"
raise SyntaxError(msg)
For a well-formed header (#define im_width 8\n…static char im_bits[] = {) each [ \t]+ eats the single space, .*/[^_]* eat the identifier prefix, and [\000-\377]*_bits\[] finds the literal on its first backward scan, so the match is linear. The crafted header diverges at every one of those points:
[ \t]+.*_widthand[ \t]+.*_height: the run of k spaces after#definecan be split between[ \t]+and.*in k ways, all leading to the same continuation. Factor k each. (The choice of\rterminators is incidental: the same header with\nterminators is equally slow.)[ \t]+[^_]*_x_hotand[ \t]+[^_]*_y_hotinside the optionalhotspotgroup:[^_]*also matches spaces, so the same k-way split exists twice more. Factor k each. These two lines are essential: without them the same input is rejected in about 10 ms.[\r\n]+closing thehotspotgroup, followed by)?and[\000-\377]*: the run of k\rbytes after_y_hot 1can be divided between[\r\n]+and[\000-\377]*in k ways. Factor k.[\000-\377]*_bits\[]: for every combination above, the engine swallows the remaining ~150 bytes of padding and walks back looking for_bits[]. The input contains_bitsbut never[], so this always fails and every combination is visited.
CPython's re is a backtracking engine without memoisation, so the total work is on the order of k^5 × (512 − header length) steps, about 10^11 for k = 60, consistent with the measured 375 s. The 512-byte read caps k (5k + ~60 ≤ 512), so the cost per open() is bounded, but the bound is minutes of CPU.
The path is the default one. Image.open() (src/PIL/Image.py:3719) reads a 16-byte prefix and offers it to every registered plugin's accept hook; XbmImagePlugin._accept() (src/PIL/XbmImagePlugin.py:43) returns true for anything whose left-stripped prefix starts with #define, and _open() then runs the regex. No size, pixel-count or decompression-bomb check can apply before this point because nothing has been parsed yet, and since the match ultimately fails the file is never identified, so the only outcome for the caller is UnidentifiedImageError after the delay. File name and extension are irrelevant because dispatch is by content. A faulthandler stack dump taken 20 s into the call shows the interpreter at XbmImagePlugin.py:58 in _open ← ImageFile.py:154 in __init__ ← Image.py:3699 in _open_core ← Image.py:3719 in open.
ImageFile.Parser.feed() (src/PIL/ImageFile.py:584) amplifies this further: until the stream is identified it calls Image.open() on all accumulated data at every feed(), so an application feeding the stream in chunks pays the regex cost once per chunk (measured: k = 15 header fed in 8 chunks → 4.6 s versus 0.76 s for a single open()).
Reproducing
repro is a single Python script. It uses the installed Pillow through the public Image.open() API and needs no rebuild.
Each input is the 512-byte header from Details: four #define lines with k spaces after #define, lines ending in \r, k \r bytes after _y_hot 1, padding with A up to the 512 bytes that _open() reads. The only thing that changes between inputs is the tail: _bits[] (valid) or _bits (the final literal can never match).
- Control. Opens the k = 60 header with the tail
_bits[]. The regex matches on its first try and Pillow reportsXBM (1, 1)in about 50 ms. This shows that the same bytes are only slow when the match has to fail. - Attack. Opens the header with the tail
_bitsat k = 10, 15, 20 and 25. Each one raisesUnidentifiedImageError, after about 0.1 s, 0.75 s, 3.0 s and 8.6 s. The time grows polynomially, not linearly. The k = 60 input from Details, which takes about 6 minutes of CPU, is not run.
Expected output on this commit:
control k=60 '_bits[]': XBM (1, 1) in 0.052s
attack k=10 '_bits' : UnidentifiedImageError in 0.105s
attack k=15 '_bits' : UnidentifiedImageError in 0.748s
attack k=20 '_bits' : UnidentifiedImageError in 3.024s
attack k=25 '_bits' : UnidentifiedImageError in 8.561s
BUG
The script prints BUG only when all of these hold:
- the control header opened as
XBMin under 1 s; - the k = 25 attack input took more than 2 s;
- the k = 25 attack input took more than 5 times as long as the k = 15 one, i.e. the cost grows super-linearly in k.
Otherwise it prints OK. With the attached patch applied, every attack input is rejected at once, so the script prints OK.
The patch
Use more specific regex chars in the XBM header regex to prevent ReDoS in Image.open() on a crafted 512-byte header
Applies to src/PIL/XbmImagePlugin.py at the commit above.
diff --git a/Tests/test_file_xbm.py b/Tests/test_file_xbm.py
index 1988c417f..67236c795 100644
--- a/Tests/test_file_xbm.py
+++ b/Tests/test_file_xbm.py
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import pytest
from PIL import Image, XbmImagePlugin
-from .helper import hopper
+from .helper import hopper, timeout_unless_slower_valgrind
TYPE_CHECKING = False
if TYPE_CHECKING:
@@ -91,3 +91,17 @@ def test_hotspot(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
with Image.open(out) as reloaded:
assert reloaded.info["hotspot"] == hotspot
+
+
+@timeout_unless_slower_valgrind(1)
+def test_redos() -> None:
+ k = 60
+ malicious = b"#define" + b" " * k + b"_width 1\r"
+ malicious += b"#define" + b" " * k + b"_height 1\r"
+ malicious += b"#define" + b" " * k + b"_x_hot 1\r"
+ malicious += b"#define" + b" " * k + b"_y_hot 1" + b"\r" * k + b"_bits"
+ malicious += b"A" * (512 - len(malicious))
+
+ # The important thing is it doesn't timeout, cause a ReDoS
+ with pytest.raises(SyntaxError):
+ XbmImagePlugin.XbmImageFile(BytesIO(malicious))
diff --git a/src/PIL/XbmImagePlugin.py b/src/PIL/XbmImagePlugin.py
index 95729d73d..7435d20f2 100644
--- a/src/PIL/XbmImagePlugin.py
+++ b/src/PIL/XbmImagePlugin.py
@@ -29,12 +29,14 @@ if TYPE_CHECKING:
from typing import IO
# XBM header
+# The identifier before each suffix cannot contain whitespace, so that it
+# cannot overlap with the preceding [ \t]+ and cause a ReDoS
xbm_head = re.compile(
- rb"\s*#define[ \t]+.*_width[ \t]+(?P<width>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
- b"#define[ \t]+.*_height[ \t]+(?P<height>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
+ rb"\s*#define[ \t]+[^ \t\r\n]*_width[ \t]+(?P<width>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
+ rb"#define[ \t]+[^ \t\r\n]*_height[ \t]+(?P<height>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
b"(?P<hotspot>"
- b"#define[ \t]+[^_]*_x_hot[ \t]+(?P<xhot>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
- b"#define[ \t]+[^_]*_y_hot[ \t]+(?P<yhot>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
+ rb"#define[ \t]+[^ \t\r\n_]*_x_hot[ \t]+(?P<xhot>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
+ rb"#define[ \t]+[^ \t\r\n_]*_y_hot[ \t]+(?P<yhot>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
b")?"
rb"[\000-\377]*_bits\[]"
)
The reproducer
Reproducer,repro, 1,138 bytes (click to open)Its last line is BUG when the issue triggers and OK when it does not. Re-run on a clean build of that commit it printed BUG.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
# XbmImagePlugin.xbm_head catastrophic backtracking, reached from Image.open()
# on a <=512-byte stream. Prints BUG if a failing 512-byte header takes
# super-linearly long while the same-shaped valid header opens instantly.
import io, time
from PIL import Image
def hdr(k, tail):
d = b""
for name in (b"_width 1\r", b"_height 1\r", b"_x_hot 1\r", b"_y_hot 1"):
d += b"#define" + b" " * k + name
d += b"\r" * k + tail
return d + b"A" * (512 - len(d))
def timed(data):
s = time.perf_counter()
try:
im = Image.open(io.BytesIO(data)); r = f"{im.format} {im.size}"
except Exception as e:
r = type(e).__name__
return r, time.perf_counter() - s
ctl, tc = timed(hdr(60, b"_bits[]"))
print(f"control k=60 '_bits[]': {ctl} in {tc:.3f}s")
ts = {}
for k in (10, 15, 20, 25):
r, ts[k] = timed(hdr(k, b"_bits"))
print(f"attack k={k:2d} '_bits' : {r} in {ts[k]:.3f}s", flush=True)
# k=60 (fits easily in 512 bytes) runs for minutes; not executed here.
bug = ctl.startswith("XBM") and tc < 1 and ts[25] > 2 and ts[25] > 5 * ts[15]
print("BUG" if bug else "OK")
Impact
Anyone who can get 512 bytes in front of Image.open(), an upload endpoint, thumbnailer, or any service that uses Pillow to sniff whether a blob is an image, pins one CPU core of the handling process for roughly six minutes per request with the default plugin set and default limits. Nothing large is allocated and no DecompressionBombWarning/Error fires; application-side upload size limits do not help because the file is tiny, and Image.MAX_IMAGE_PIXELS is never consulted because no image is ever identified. A handful of concurrent requests is enough to exhaust a typical worker pool. The per-call cost is bounded by the 512-byte header read, so this is a CPU-exhaustion denial of service of the handling process rather than an infinite loop. Applications that pass an explicit formats= allowlist to Image.open() that excludes "XBM" are not affected.
This is the same bug class as CVE-2021-25292 (catastrophic backtracking in the PdfParser regexes, fixed in 8.1.1) and CVE-2021-23437 (ImageColor.getrgb ReDoS, fixed in 8.3.2), in a different plugin; unlike the PDF case it is reached from plain Image.open() on any byte stream.
A regular expression with worst-case exponential or polynomial matching time is applied to untrusted input, causing excessive CPU use. Typical impact: denial of service when input is crafted to trigger backtracking.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
The attached patch removes the overlap between [ \t]+ and the quantifier that matches the identifier prefix in xbm_head (src/PIL/XbmImagePlugin.py:32-40), so the whitespace after #define can be consumed in exactly one way and the identifier cannot run across line terminators. It matches the identifier with [^ \t\r\n]* (and [^ \t\r\n_]* in the hotspot group, which keeps the existing "no underscore before _x_hot/_y_hot" behaviour); the remaining quantifier pairs are then either over disjoint character classes or reduce to a single linear rescan of at most 512 bytes:
xbm_head = re.compile(
- rb"\s*#define[ \t]+.*_width[ \t]+(?P<width>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
- b"#define[ \t]+.*_height[ \t]+(?P<height>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
+ rb"\s*#define[ \t]+[^ \t\r\n]*_width[ \t]+(?P<width>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
+ rb"#define[ \t]+[^ \t\r\n]*_height[ \t]+(?P<height>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
b"(?P<hotspot>"
- b"#define[ \t]+[^_]*_x_hot[ \t]+(?P<xhot>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
- b"#define[ \t]+[^_]*_y_hot[ \t]+(?P<yhot>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
+ rb"#define[ \t]+[^ \t\r\n_]*_x_hot[ \t]+(?P<xhot>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
+ rb"#define[ \t]+[^ \t\r\n_]*_y_hot[ \t]+(?P<yhot>[0-9]+)[\r\n]+"
b")?"
rb"[\000-\377]*_bits\[]"
)
This mirrors the PdfParser fix for CVE-2021-25292. The patch also adds a test_redos case to Tests/test_file_xbm.py, in the style of the one in Tests/test_file_pdf.py: it builds the k = 60 header from Details and, under @timeout_unless_slower_valgrind(1), expects XbmImageFile to raise SyntaxError. With the patch applied to a clean checkout and rebuilt, the reproducer prints OK and the existing Tests/test_file_xbm.py (including hopper.xbm, hopper_underscore.xbm and the hotspot round-trip) still passes. The change does reject headers whose identifier contains whitespace (#define foo bar_width 16), which is not valid C and is not produced by Pillow's own XBM writer.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-112901? CVE-2026-112901 is a medium-severity inefficient regular expression (ReDoS) vulnerability in Pillow (pip), affecting versions <= 12.3.0. It is fixed in 13.0.0. A regular expression with worst-case exponential or polynomial matching time is applied to untrusted input, causing excessive CPU use.
- Which versions of Pillow are affected by CVE-2026-112901? Pillow (pip) versions <= 12.3.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-112901? Yes. CVE-2026-112901 is fixed in 13.0.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-112901 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-112901 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-112901 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-112901? Upgrade
Pillowto 13.0.0 or later.