CVE-2026-115913

CVE-2026-115913 is a medium-severity allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in vllm (pip), affecting versions < 0.32.0. It is fixed in 0.32.0.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

vLLM: Phi-4 multimodal audio encoder materializes and retains full attention matrices: a single max-length audio OOM-crashes the vLLM engine

The Phi-4 multimodal audio encoder (phi4mm_audio.py / phi4mm_utils.py) runs its conformer attention in eager mode by default: the official HF config of microsoft/Phi-4-multimodal-instruct does not set use_pt_scaled_dot_product_attention, so the default False applies (phi4mm_audio.py:166, :876; phi4mm_utils.py:1669). The eager path fully materializes the attention probability matrix of shape [n_chunks, 16, 500, 500] per layer, and then stores it on the module: self.attn = attn (phi4mm_utils.py:1802, a torch.jit.Attribute declared at :1693), keeping a live reference for every one of the 24 encoder layers.

The only gates on audio length are the server-side limits VLLM_MAX_AUDIO_CLIP_FILESIZE_MB=25 and VLLM_MAX_AUDIO_DECODE_DURATION_S=600 (envs.py:83-84), i.e. a 10-minute clip is a legal input by default. A 600 s clip becomes ~60,000 mel frames, which the encoder unfolds into 500-frame chunks (phi4mm_audio.py:996, max_seq_len = 500), giving n_chunks ≈ 120. Each layer therefore materializes a 120×16×500×500 matrix (~1–2 GiB depending on dtype), and the module attribute keeps all completed layers' matrices alive, so GPU memory climbs monotonically within a single request until an allocation fails.

Verified end-to-end on the official vllm/vllm-openai:v0.31.0 image: one 19.2 MB silent 600 s WAV → worker torch.OutOfMemoryError: CUDA out of memory. Tried to allocate 2.29 GiB ... 501.75 MiB free ... 22.09 GiB allocated by PyTorch inside get_audio_features (phi4mm_audio.py:1279 → :1332 → phi4mm_utils.py:1386) → EngineCore encountered a fatal error → API EngineDeadError → whole server down; /health refuses connections. Total time from request to dead service: ~6 seconds.

A secondary effect: because self.attn persists on the module after the request ends, the matrices of the last audio request stay resident indefinitely (observed +50 MiB pinned after a single 5 s control request); they are only overwritten by the next audio request, so the resident footprint equals the largest audio processed since startup.

Details

1. Root cause. MultiHeadedAttention.forward_attention in eager mode computes attn = masked_softmax(scores, mask) and unconditionally executes self.attn = attn (phi4mm_utils.py:1795-1802). The attribute is a leftover inference/debug hook (used by torch.jit.Attribute(None, Tensor | None) at :1693); in serving it serves no purpose but pins the full [batch·chunks, heads, T, T] tensor per layer past both the layer's forward and the request's lifetime. The SDP attention branch (use_pt_scaled_dot_product_attention=True) never materializes this matrix, but the HF config does not enable it and the code default is False.

2. Why one request suffices. The conformer chunks long audio to max_seq_len = 500 frames (phi4mm_audio.py:996). Duration is bounded only by VLLM_MAX_AUDIO_DECODE_DURATION_S=600, so n_chunks reaches ~120 for a maximal clip. With 16 heads and fp32 scores, one layer's attention tensor is ~1.8 GiB (the observed failing allocation was 2.29 GiB, consistent with the scores+bias materialization). The encoder has num_blocks=24, attention_heads=16, attention_dim=1024, time_reduction=8 (HF config). Weights plus a handful of retained per-layer matrices exhaust the ~2.3 GiB headroom that --gpu-memory-utilization 0.9 leaves on a 24 GB card, mid-forward, on the first request.

4. Deployment reality. --trust-remote-code is the documented, standard way to serve this model (the HF model card instructs it), so the finding applies to default deployments. The crash is deterministic, not load-dependent: scheduler stats at death show a single running request and near-zero KV cache usage.

Impact

Any unauthenticated client that can reach the chat/completions API of a default deployment serving Phi-4-multimodal-instruct (or any model reusing this audio tower) can kill the entire engine with one request carrying a perfectly legal 10-minute audio clip (silent noise suffices, no crafted content needed). Full denial of service, requiring a process restart. On GPUs with more headroom (e.g. 80 GB at default utilization) a single request may survive, but the eager path still materializes GiB-scale per-layer matrices and retains the last request's tensors indefinitely, so a few sequential max-length requests, or normal traffic following one, achieve the same result.

Relation to prior art: the only public Phi-4-mm advisory we found, GHSA-vc6m-hm49-g9qg, concerns a CPU-side quadratic-cost path, different subsystem, different mechanism. GitHub search for "phi4mm audio OOM/memory" (31 results, 2026-10-08) shows no report of this attention-retention issue; main (2026-10-08) is unchanged.

Suggested remediation (any one breaks the chain; 1+2 recommended):

  1. Remove self.attn = attn from the serving path (or gate it behind an explicit debug/output_attentions flag) so attention matrices are freed when the layer returns.
  2. Default use_pt_scaled_dot_product_attention to True (flash/SDPA kernels never materialize the [B, H, T, T] matrix); keep eager only as an opt-in.
  3. Additionally bound the encoder input (frames or duration) for this model so the eager path cannot reach GiB-scale single-layer allocations even if enabled.

This advisory was fixed in MR60614.

The application allocates resources such as memory, threads, or file descriptors based on untrusted input without enforcing a cap. Typical impact: resource exhaustion leading to denial of service.

CVE-2026-115913 has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.32.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

vllm (< 0.32.0)

Security releases

vllm → 0.32.0 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade vllm to 0.32.0 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-115913? CVE-2026-115913 is a medium-severity allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in vllm (pip), affecting versions < 0.32.0. It is fixed in 0.32.0. The application allocates resources such as memory, threads, or file descriptors based on untrusted input without enforcing a cap.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-115913? CVE-2026-115913 has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of vllm are affected by CVE-2026-115913? vllm (pip) versions < 0.32.0 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-115913? Yes. CVE-2026-115913 is fixed in 0.32.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-115913 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-115913 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-115913 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-115913? Upgrade vllm to 0.32.0 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in vllm

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.