CVE-2026-116692

CVE-2026-116692 is a critical-severity code injection vulnerability in mlflow (pip), affecting versions >= 3.12.0rc0, < 3.17.0. It is fixed in 3.17.0.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

MLflow vulnerable to remote code execution on unauthenticated servers via third-party scorer deserialization importing caller-placed artifact modules

MLflow 3.12.0 introduced registration and deserialization support for third-party scorers in OSS MLflow. During scorer deserialization, the server accepts a request-controlled Python module path beneath one of four allowed package prefixes, imports that module, obtains a request-controlled class, and instantiates it synchronously.

An HTTP caller can combine this behavior with MLflow's built-in experiment, run, and artifact-upload endpoints:

  1. Create an experiment whose local artifact location points to a writable allowed scorer package.
  2. Create a run, causing MLflow to allocate <artifact_location>/<run_id>/artifacts/.
  3. Upload a Python module into that run artifact directory.
  4. Submit a serialized third-party scorer whose module path resolves to the uploaded file.
  5. Trigger server-side import and class construction through /ajax-api/3.0/mlflow/scorer/invoke.

On the default no-auth server using the official MLflow v3.14.0 image, this produces unauthenticated arbitrary Python code execution with the privileges of the MLflow server process. The reproduced image runs the process as uid 0 and permits writes to its installed Python package tree.

The attached proof of concept is intentionally harmless. The uploaded constructor performs one action only: it writes a random marker beside its own uploaded run artifact. The marker is then downloaded through MLflow's run-artifact endpoint and checked for an exact match.

Technical details

1. The allow-list accepts attacker-created descendants

At release commit 86cd7f5a1dc25a1387ad07c87811bbc30f62951c, mlflow/genai/scorers/scorer_utils.py defines these allowed roots:

THIRD_PARTY_SCORER_ALLOWED_MODULES = frozenset({
    "mlflow.genai.scorers.ragas",
    "mlflow.genai.scorers.deepeval",
    "mlflow.genai.scorers.trulens",
    "mlflow.genai.scorers.phoenix",
})

In mlflow/genai/scorers/base.py, the deserializer accepts either an exact root or any descendant:

module_path == m or module_path.startswith(m + ".")

It then performs the following operations using request-controlled values:

module = importlib.import_module(module_path)
scorer_class = getattr(module, class_name, None)
scorer_instance = scorer_class(**init_kwargs)

A package-name prefix is not a provenance boundary. If the server process can write below an allowed package, an attacker-created descendant can satisfy the string-prefix check and become importable Python code.

Relevant source locations at the v3.14.0 release commit:

  • mlflow/genai/scorers/scorer_utils.py, allowed third-party scorer modules
  • mlflow/genai/scorers/base.py, third-party scorer deserialization and construction

2. Deserialization occurs before trace processing

In mlflow/server/handlers.py, _invoke_scorer_handler() parses the supplied serialized scorer and calls:

scorer = Scorer.model_validate_json(serialized_scorer)

Only after deserialization and construction does the handler call:

batches = get_trace_batches_for_scorer(trace_ids, scorer, tracking_store)

The attacker-controlled constructor therefore runs before the server validates or resolves the supplied trace IDs.

The minimal proof class is deliberately not a complete MLflow scorer. After its constructor writes the marker, later trace-batching logic accesses scorer attributes that the proof class does not implement. The resulting HTTP 500 occurs after code execution and does not invalidate the proof.

No background job execution or special job-execution server option is required to reach the constructor.

3. MLflow's artifact layout places the module under the trusted prefix

The experiment creation endpoint accepts an artifact_location. For file-backed experiments, MLflow derives each run artifact directory as:

<artifact_location>/<run_id>/artifacts/

The proof of concept selects this package directory in the official v3.14.0 image:

file:///usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/mlflow/genai/scorers/trulens

After creating a run and uploading audit_<token>.py, the resulting filesystem location is:

/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/mlflow/genai/scorers/trulens/<run_id>/artifacts/audit_<token>.py

The corresponding import path is:

mlflow.genai.scorers.trulens.<run_id>.artifacts.audit_<token>

The attack does not overwrite an existing package module. It creates a new run-scoped module in the normal file-backed artifact layout. The run ID is returned to the caller.

4. Authentication and authorization behavior

With authentication disabled, as in the default reproduced server configuration, no credentials are required.

When MLflow basic authentication is enabled, authentication still applies. However, the scorer-invocation AJAX endpoint is assigned to validate_gateway_proxy, which returns True without performing an experiment- or scorer-level resource permission check.

Practical exploitation in an authenticated deployment still requires the caller to create an experiment and run and upload artifacts to them. The key authorization issue is that scorer deserialization itself is not gated by a resource-specific permission check for the supplied experiment before the import occurs.

Proof of concept

The attached reproduction is intentionally isolated:

  • exact official MLflow v3.14.0 image pinned by manifest digest;
  • Docker network disabled;
  • MLflow bound to container loopback;
  • no shell command or external callback;
  • no external request;
  • no host filesystem write;
  • marker created beside the uploaded run artifact;
  • marker retrieved through the run-artifact download endpoint; and
  • disposable container removed after completion.

Run:

./run-official-image.sh

Expected output:

MLFLOW_VERSION=3.14.0
PACKAGE_DIR=/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/mlflow/genai/scorers/trulens
CREATE_EXPERIMENT_STATUS=200
CREATE_RUN_STATUS=200
UPLOAD_STATUS=200
INVOKE_STATUS=500
PROOF_DOWNLOAD_STATUS=200
PROOF_MATCH=1
RESULT=AFFECTED

The security-relevant result is:

PROOF_MATCH=1
RESULT=AFFECTED

This proves that the attacker-controlled constructor executed in the MLflow server process before the later scorer-processing failure.

Reproduction environment

  • Release: MLflow v3.14.0
  • Release commit: 86cd7f5a1dc25a1387ad07c87811bbc30f62951c
  • Official image: ghcr.io/mlflow/mlflow:v3.14.0
  • Manifest digest: sha256:967de3ca34b6a5751718e380a0a383eb0ce1a6f5b484f363bd0da7559117a5f8
  • Python version: 3.10.18
  • Image-configured user: empty
  • Observed runtime user: uid 0
  • Server bind: 127.0.0.1:5000
  • Container network: disabled
  • Backend store: sqlite:////work/mlflow.db
  • Default artifact root: /work/artifacts
  • Authentication: disabled
  • Special job-execution option: none

Server command inside the disposable container:

mlflow server \
  --host 127.0.0.1 \
  --port 5000 \
  --backend-store-uri sqlite:////work/mlflow.db \
  --default-artifact-root /work/artifacts

Affected range and source lineage

The vulnerable third-party scorer deserialization behavior was introduced by commit:

02eea26035b9d8e65af31e6e8f058ca195f62cdd
Enable third-party scorer registration in OSS MLflow (#22634)

The feature is absent from v3.11.1 and first appears in v3.12.0.

Runtime reproduction succeeds on v3.14.0. The relevant mlflow/genai/scorers/base.py content is unchanged at master commit:

20858c9426a9644dfcf9545a92cbb534376779eb

No fixed release was identified as of 2026-07-12.

Artifacts and attachments

Remote proof-of-concept script

POC Script: new_remote_poc.py

The remote proof of concept was then executed as follows. The disposable machine’s public IP has been redacted:

python3 new_remote_poc.py \
  --target http://<REDACTED_PUBLIC_IP> \
  --package-dir /usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/mlflow/genai/scorers/trulens \
  --acknowledge-owned-target I_OWN_THIS_TARGET

The complete sanitized output was:

TARGET=http://<REDACTED_PUBLIC_IP>
VERSION_STATUS=200
MLFLOW_VERSION=3.14.0
CREATE_EXPERIMENT_STATUS=200
EXPERIMENT_ID=2
CREATE_RUN_STATUS=200
RUN_ID=9a2d665eb38940b68983f0586f623115
UPLOAD_STATUS=200
IMPORT_PATH=mlflow.genai.scorers.trulens.9a2d665eb38940b68983f0586f623115.artifacts.audit_1783843760683972103
INVOKE_STATUS=500
INVOKE_RESPONSE_PREVIEW='<!doctype html>\n<html lang=en>\n<title>500 Internal Server Error</title>\n<h1>Internal Server Error</h1>\n<p>The server encountered an internal error and was unable to complete your request. Either the server is overloaded or there is an error in the application.</p>\n'
PROOF_DOWNLOAD_STATUS=200
EXPECTED_MARKER_SHA256=7a423b479df3524567fdf8cc3e7f6c4bfccc577fbcc4bac9519db8bd1cc61ed5
PROOF_MATCH=1
SERVER_CLEANUP_PATH=/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/mlflow/genai/scorers/trulens/9a2d665eb38940b68983f0586f623115
PROOF_OUTPUT_BEGIN
{
  "cwd": "/",
  "machine": "x86_64",
  "marker": "MLFLOW_REMOTE_SAFE_MARKER_1783843760683972103",
  "os_release": "PRETTY_NAME=\"Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)\"\nNAME=\"Debian GNU/Linux\"\nVERSION_ID=\"11\"\nVERSION=\"11 (bullseye)\"\nVERSION_CODENAME=bullseye\nID=debian\nHOME_URL=\"https://www.debian.org/\"\nSUPPORT_URL=\"https://www.debian.org/support\"\nBUG_REPORT_URL=\"https://bugs.debian.org/\"\n",
  "platform": "Linux-7.0.0-1006-aws-x86_64-with-glibc2.31",
  "python_implementation": "CPython",
  "python_version": "3.10.18",
  "server_datetime_utc": "2026-07-12T08:09:43.555055+00:00",
  "whoami": "root",
  "whoami_returncode": 0,
  "whoami_stderr": ""
}
PROOF_OUTPUT_END
RESULT=AFFECTED
EXPERIMENT_METADATA_CLEANUP_STATUS=200
CLEANUP_NOTE=discard the temporary test instance or remove SERVER_CLEANUP_PATH on the owned host

The proof file was also verified directly inside the disposable container:

cat /usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/mlflow/genai/scorers/trulens/9a2d665eb38940b68983f0586f623115/artifacts/execution-proof-1783843760683972103.json

The file contained:

{
  "cwd": "/",
  "machine": "x86_64",
  "marker": "MLFLOW_REMOTE_SAFE_MARKER_1783843760683972103",
  "os_release": "PRETTY_NAME=\"Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)\"\nNAME=\"Debian GNU/Linux\"\nVERSION_ID=\"11\"\nVERSION=\"11 (bullseye)\"\nVERSION_CODENAME=bullseye\nID=debian\nHOME_URL=\"https://www.debian.org/\"\nSUPPORT_URL=\"https://www.debian.org/support\"\nBUG_REPORT_URL=\"https://bugs.debian.org/\"\n",
  "platform": "Linux-7.0.0-1006-aws-x86_64-with-glibc2.31",
  "python_implementation": "CPython",
  "python_version": "3.10.18",
  "server_datetime_utc": "2026-07-12T08:09:43.555055+00:00",
  "whoami": "root",
  "whoami_returncode": 0,
  "whoami_stderr": ""
}

The results demonstrate that:

  • the attacker-controlled module was uploaded beneath an allowed scorer package;
  • MLflow imported the request-selected module and invoked its constructor;
  • the constructor executed as the MLflow server process, which ran as root in the reproduced official image;
  • the constructor created a server-side proof file containing a random marker and bounded runtime information;
  • the proof file was retrieved successfully through MLflow’s artifact-download endpoint; and
  • the later HTTP 500 occurred only after constructor execution.

The authoritative reproduction indicators are:

UPLOAD_STATUS=200
PROOF_DOWNLOAD_STATUS=200
PROOF_MATCH=1
RESULT=AFFECTED

The disposable cloud machine and container were removed after testing.

Local Reproduction Scripts:
run-official-image.sh
poc_local.py

Impact

On the reproduced stock no-auth image, any network caller who can reach the tracking server can execute Python code as the MLflow process without credentials or user interaction.

Successful exploitation provides confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact over all data, credentials, network access, and filesystem locations available to the MLflow server process.

The stock image's runtime uid 0 increases container-level impact. Host impact still depends on the container runtime configuration, mounted paths, granted capabilities, socket exposure, and other isolation controls.

In authentication-enabled deployments, exploitation requires an authenticated principal capable of creating an experiment and run and uploading artifacts. The exact chain also requires the server process to be able to write beneath one of the allowed scorer packages. This condition holds in the reproduced official image and may hold in virtual environments installed and run by the same operating-system user.

A read-only container filesystem or a scorer package directory owned by a different, non-writable user blocks this exact placement chain.

Untrusted input is evaluated as executable code within the application's runtime environment. Typical impact: arbitrary code execution within the application's privilege context.

CVE-2026-116692 has a CVSS score of 9.8 (Critical). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.17.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

mlflow (>= 3.12.0rc0, < 3.17.0)

Security releases

mlflow → 3.17.0 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade mlflow to 3.17.0 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-116692? CVE-2026-116692 is a critical-severity code injection vulnerability in mlflow (pip), affecting versions >= 3.12.0rc0, < 3.17.0. It is fixed in 3.17.0. Untrusted input is evaluated as executable code within the application's runtime environment.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-116692? CVE-2026-116692 has a CVSS score of 9.8 (Critical). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of mlflow are affected by CVE-2026-116692? mlflow (pip) versions >= 3.12.0rc0, < 3.17.0 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-116692? Yes. CVE-2026-116692 is fixed in 3.17.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-116692 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-116692 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-116692 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-116692? Upgrade mlflow to 3.17.0 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in mlflow

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.