CVE-2026-27127

CVE-2026-27127 is a high-severity security vulnerability in craftcms/cms (composer), affecting versions >= 5.0.0-RC1, <= 5.8.22. It is fixed in 5.8.23, 4.16.19.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Craft CMS has Cloud Metadata SSRF Protection Bypass via DNS Rebinding

The SSRF validation in Craft CMS’s GraphQL Asset mutation performs DNS resolution separately from the HTTP request. This Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) vulnerability enables DNS rebinding attacks, where an attacker’s DNS server returns different IP addresses for validation compared to the actual request.

This is a bypass of the security fix for CVE-2025-68437 (GHSA-x27p-wfqw-hfcc) that allows access to all blocked IPs, not just IPv6 endpoints.

Severity

Bypass of cloud metadata SSRF protection for all blocked IPs

Required Permissions

Exploitation requires GraphQL schema permissions for:

  • Edit assets in the <VolumeName> volume
  • Create assets in the <VolumeName> volume

These permissions may be granted to:

  • Authenticated users with appropriate GraphQL schema access
  • Public Schema (if misconfigured with write permissions)

Technical Details

Vulnerable Code Flow

The code at src/gql/resolvers/mutations/Asset.php performs two separate DNS lookups:

// VALIDATION PHASE: First DNS resolution at time T1
private function validateHostname(string $url): bool
{
    $hostname = parse_url($url, PHP_URL_HOST);
    $ip = gethostbyname($hostname);  // DNS Lookup #1 - Returns safe IP

    if (in_array($ip, [
        '169.254.169.254',   // AWS, GCP, Azure IMDS
        '169.254.170.2',     // AWS ECS metadata
        '100.100.100.200',   // Alibaba Cloud
        '192.0.0.192',       // Oracle Cloud
    ])) {
        return false;  // Check passes - IP looks safe
    }
    return true;
}

// ... time gap between validation and request ...

// REQUEST PHASE: Second DNS resolution at time T2 (inside Guzzle)
$response = $client->get($url);  // DNS Lookup #2 - Guzzle resolves DNS AGAIN
                                  // Now returns 169.254.169.254!

Root Cause

Two separate DNS lookups occur:

  1. Validation: gethostbyname() in validateHostname()
  2. Request: Guzzle's internal DNS resolution via libcurl

An attacker controlling a DNS server can return different IPs for each query.

Bypass Mechanism

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Attacker's DNS Server: evil.attacker.com                                    |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Query 1 (Validation - T1):                                                  |
|   Request:  A record for evil.attacker.com                                  |
|   Response: 1.2.3.4 (safe IP, TTL: 0)                                       |
|   Result:   Validation PASSES                                               |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Query 2 (Guzzle Request - T2):                                              |
|   Request:  A record for evil.attacker.com                                  |
|   Response: 169.254.169.254 (metadata IP, TTL: 0)                           |
|   Result:   Request goes to blocked IP -> CREDENTIALS STOLEN                |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Target Endpoints via DNS Rebinding

DNS rebinding allows access to all blocked IPs:

Target Rebind To Impact
AWS IMDS 169.254.169.254 IAM credentials, instance identity
AWS ECS 169.254.170.2 Container credentials
GCP Metadata 169.254.169.254 Service account tokens
Azure Metadata 169.254.169.254 Managed identity tokens
Alibaba Cloud 100.100.100.200 Instance credentials
Oracle Cloud 192.0.0.192 Instance metadata
Internal Services 127.0.0.1, 10.x.x.x Internal APIs, databases

Attack Scenario

  1. Attacker sets up DNS server with alternating responses
  2. Attacker sends mutation with url: "http://evil.attacker.com/latest/meta-data/"
  3. First DNS query returns safe IP (e.g., 1.2.3.4) → validation passes
  4. Second DNS query returns metadata IP (169.254.169.254) → request to metadata
  5. Attacker retrieves credentials from ANY cloud provider
  6. Attacker can now achieve code execution by creating new instances with their SSH key

Fix: DNS Pinning with CURLOPT_RESOLVE

Pin the DNS resolution - use the same resolved IP for both validation and request:

private function validateHostname(string $url): bool
{
    $hostname = parse_url($url, PHP_URL_HOST);

    // Resolve once
    $ip = gethostbyname($hostname);

    // Validate the resolved IP
    if (in_array($ip, [
        '169.254.169.254', '169.254.170.2',
        '100.100.100.200', '192.0.0.192',
    ])) {
        return false;
    }

    // Store for later use
    $this->pinnedDNS[$hostname] = $ip;

    return true;
}

// When making the request - CRITICAL: Use pinned IP
protected function makeRequest(string $url): ResponseInterface
{
    $hostname = parse_url($url, PHP_URL_HOST);
    $ip = $this->pinnedDNS[$hostname] ?? null;

    $options = [];
    if ($ip) {
        // Force Guzzle/curl to use the SAME IP we validated
        $options['curl'] = [
            CURLOPT_RESOLVE => [
                "$hostname:80:$ip",
                "$hostname:443:$ip"
            ]
        ];
    }

    return $this->client->get($url, $options);
}

Alternative: Single Resolution with Immediate Use

// Resolve to IP and use IP directly in URL
$ip = gethostbyname($hostname);

if (in_array($ip, $blockedIPs)) {
    return false;
}

// Make request directly to IP with Host header
$client->get("http://$ip" . parse_url($url, PHP_URL_PATH), [
    'headers' => [
        'Host' => $hostname
    ]
]);

Additional Mitigations

Mitigation Description
DNS Pinning (CURLOPT_RESOLVE) Force same IP for validation and request
Single IP-based request Use resolved IP directly in URL
Implement IMDSv2 Requires token header (infrastructure-level)
Network egress filtering Block metadata IPs at network level

Resources

Impact

Affected versions

craftcms/cms (>= 5.0.0-RC1, <= 5.8.22) craftcms/cms (>= 3.5.0, <= 4.16.18)

Security releases

craftcms/cms → 5.8.23 (composer) craftcms/cms → 4.16.19 (composer)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade the following packages to resolve this vulnerability:

craftcms/cms to 5.8.23 or later; craftcms/cms to 4.16.19 or later

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-27127? CVE-2026-27127 is a high-severity security vulnerability in craftcms/cms (composer), affecting versions >= 5.0.0-RC1, <= 5.8.22. It is fixed in 5.8.23, 4.16.19.
  2. Which versions of craftcms/cms are affected by CVE-2026-27127? craftcms/cms (composer) versions >= 5.0.0-RC1, <= 5.8.22 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-27127? Yes. CVE-2026-27127 is fixed in 5.8.23, 4.16.19. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is CVE-2026-27127 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-27127 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-27127 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix CVE-2026-27127?
    • Upgrade craftcms/cms to 5.8.23 or later
    • Upgrade craftcms/cms to 4.16.19 or later

Other vulnerabilities in craftcms/cms

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.