Summary
Kargo Vulnerable to SSRF in Promotion http/http-download Steps Enables Internal Network Access and Data Exfiltration
Kargo's built-in http and http-download promotion steps execute outbound HTTP requests from the Kargo controller. By design, these steps do not restrict destination addresses, as there are legitimate use cases for requests to internal and private endpoints. However, this also permits requests to link-local addresses, for which there are no known, legitimate use cases. Of particular concern is the cloud instance metadata endpoint (often 169.254.169.254), which is unauthenticated and can expose sensitive configuration data including IAM credentials. While cloud providers typically implement header-based SSRF mitigations for these endpoints, the http step provides full control over request method and headers, rendering these protections ineffective. The http-download step provides control over headers only (not method), but this is still sufficient for exfiltrating data from metadata endpoints.
There are two vectors for exploitation. A user with permission to create or update a Stage can configure its promotion template to include malicious http or http-download steps. Alternatively, a user with promote permission on any Stage can craft a Promotion resource directly. In either case, the controller executes the steps in-cluster, and response data can be inserted into Promotion status fields, written to a Git repository, or sent to a remote location using a second instance of the http step.
The remediation for this issue is the introduction of a safe HTTP transport that refuses to dial link-local addresses. Requests to private and internal addresses will continue to be permitted, as this is by design. It is the responsibility of services at such addresses to implement proper authentication and authorization, and/or the responsibility of platform teams to define and enforce network policies that restrict traffic appropriately.
Base Metrics
The following sections provide the rationale for the values selected for each of CVSS v4's base metrics.
Attack Vector (AV): Network
The Kargo API server is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS. No local, adjacent network, or physical access is required.
Attack Complexity (AC): Low
Exploitation requires only a crafted Promotion manifest submitted via the Kargo API. No race conditions, non-default configurations, or prior information gathering is required.
Attack Requirements (AT): None
No specific environmental conditions are required beyond a standard Kargo deployment. The http and http-download built-in steps are always available.
Privileges Required (PR): High
The attacker must be authenticated to the Kargo API server and hold permissions sufficient to create or update a Stage, or to craft a Promotion resource directly. Although these may not be considered administrative permissions, they are non-trivial, not granted broadly by default, and must be explicitly assigned by a project administrator.
User Interaction (UI): None
The attack is fully automated via API calls. No other user needs to take any action. The controller processes the malicious Promotion without human intervention.
Confidentiality Impact to Vulnerable System (VC): None
Kargo itself does not expose its own secrets or configuration data through this vulnerability. The impact is to other systems reachable from the controller's network position, not to Kargo's own data.
Integrity Impact to Vulnerable System (VI): None
Kargo's own data and configuration are not modified by this vulnerability. While malicious Promotion resources are created, they function within Kargo's normal processing pipeline.
Availability Impact to Vulnerable System (VA): None
This vulnerability does not enable denial of service against Kargo. Each Promotion executes a bounded set of HTTP requests and does not consume disproportionate resources.
Confidentiality Impact to Subsequent Systems (SC): Low
The controller runs in-cluster and can reach link-local addresses, including cloud instance metadata endpoints. These endpoints are unauthenticated and can expose sensitive data such as IAM credentials. Provider-side header-based SSRF mitigations are ineffective because these steps provide full control over request headers.
Integrity Impact to Subsequent Systems (SI): None
Cloud instance metadata endpoints are read-only. While the http step supports arbitrary HTTP methods, the only unintended access enabled by this vulnerability is to link-local addresses, and these do not accept state-changing requests.
Availability Impact to Subsequent Systems (SA): None
A single HTTP request per promotion step does not constitute a meaningful denial-of-service vector against subsequent systems. There is no amplification mechanism.
Mitigating Factors
Exploitation requires authentication to the Kargo API server with permissions to create or update Stages, or to craft Promotion resources directly. These permissions must be explicitly granted by a project administrator.
All Promotion creation is audited. The creating user's identity is recorded in annotations and Kubernetes events, providing a clear forensic trail.
The practical impact is limited to cloud instance metadata endpoints. Access to private and internal addresses is by design, and services at those addresses are expected to implement their own authentication and authorization.
Impact
Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside. Typical impact: access to internal metadata services, internal APIs, or cloud credentials.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
github.com/akuity/kargo to 1.6.4 or later; github.com/akuity/kargo to 1.7.9 or later; github.com/akuity/kargo to 1.8.12 or later; github.com/akuity/kargo to 1.9.5 or later
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-32828? CVE-2026-32828 is a medium-severity server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in github.com/akuity/kargo (go), affecting versions >= 1.4.0, < 1.6.4. It is fixed in 1.6.4, 1.7.9, 1.8.12, 1.9.5. Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside.
- Which versions of github.com/akuity/kargo are affected by CVE-2026-32828? github.com/akuity/kargo (go) versions >= 1.4.0, < 1.6.4 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-32828? Yes. CVE-2026-32828 is fixed in 1.6.4, 1.7.9, 1.8.12, 1.9.5. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-32828 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-32828 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-32828 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-32828?
- Upgrade
github.com/akuity/kargoto 1.6.4 or later - Upgrade
github.com/akuity/kargoto 1.7.9 or later - Upgrade
github.com/akuity/kargoto 1.8.12 or later - Upgrade
github.com/akuity/kargoto 1.9.5 or later
- Upgrade