CVE-2026-44492

shouldBypassProxy, introduced in v1.15.0 to fix CVE-2025-62718, does not normalise IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses. When NO_PROXY lists an IPv4 address such as 127.0.0.1 or 169.254.169.254, a request URL using the IPv4-mapped IPv6 form (::ffff:7f00:1, ::ffff:a9fe:a9fe) still routes through the configured proxy. Node.js resolves these addresses to the underlying IPv4 host, so the request reaches the internal service via the proxy rather than being blocked.

Details

lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js (v1.15.0):

  const LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set(['localhost', '127.0.0.1', '::1']);                                                                                                      
  const isLoopback = (host) => LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(host);                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                                                
  // normalizeNoProxyHost strips brackets and trailing dots, but not ::ffff: prefix                                                                                             
  return hostname === entryHost || (isLoopback(hostname) && isLoopback(entryHost));                                                                                             

The WHATWG URL parser canonicalises http://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]/ to hostname [::ffff:7f00:1]. After bracket-stripping: ::ffff:7f00:1. This string does not match 127.0.0.1 in NO_PROXY and is not in LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES, so shouldBypassProxy returns false and the proxy is used. proxy-from-env (called before shouldBypassProxy) has the same gap - it does not equate ::ffff:7f00:1 with 127.0.0.1 - so neither layer catches the bypass.

PoC

// NO_PROXY=127.0.0.1,localhost,::1  HTTP_PROXY=http://attacker:8080
import shouldBypassProxy from 'axios/lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js';                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                                                              
// All three should return true (bypass proxy). Only the first two do.                                                                                                        
console.log(shouldBypassProxy('http://127.0.0.1/'));          // true  [OK]                                                                                                     
console.log(shouldBypassProxy('http://[::1]/'));               // true  [OK]                                                                                                     
console.log(shouldBypassProxy('http://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]/')); // false <- bypass                                                                                             
console.log(shouldBypassProxy('http://[::ffff:7f00:1]/'));     // false <- bypass

Node.js routes ::ffff:7f00:1 to 127.0.0.1:

// net.connect({ host: '::ffff:7f00:1', port: 80 }) reaches a service                                                                                                       
// bound to 127.0.0.1:80, confirmed on Node.js v24, Linux and macOS.                                                                                                         

Cloud metadata SSRF: ::ffff:a9fe:a9fe = ::ffff:169.254.169.254. If NO_PROXY=169.254.169.254 is set to block IMDS access, a request to http://[::ffff:a9fe:a9fe]/latest/meta-data/ bypasses it.

Any application that sets NO_PROXY to exclude internal or metadata endpoints and uses an HTTP/HTTPS proxy can have those exclusions bypassed by a URL using IPv4-mapped IPv6 notation. The attacker must control the request URL. In cloud environments with instance metadata services, this can lead to credential exfiltration.

Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside. Typical impact: access to internal metadata services, internal APIs, or cloud credentials.

CVE-2026-44492 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.16.0, 0.32.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Kodem intelligence

Canonicalise IPv4-mapped IPv6 in normalizeNoProxyHost before any comparison:

const ipv4MappedDotted = /^::ffff:(\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3})$/i;                                                                                                    
const ipv4MappedHex    = /^::ffff:([0-9a-f]{1,4}):([0-9a-f]{1,4})$/i;                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                                                             
function hexToIPv4(a, b) {                                                                                                                                                    
 const hi = parseInt(a, 16), lo = parseInt(b, 16);                                                                                                                           
 return `${hi >> 8}.${hi & 0xff}.${lo >> 8}.${lo & 0xff}`;                                                                                                                   
}                                                                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                                                             
const normalizeNoProxyHost = (hostname) => {                                                                                                                                  
 if (!hostname) return hostname;                                                                                                                                           
 if (hostname[0] === '[' && hostname.at(-1) === ']')
   hostname = hostname.slice(1, -1);                                                                                                                                         
 hostname = hostname.replace(/\.+$/, '').toLowerCase();
                                                                                                                                                                             
 let m;                                                                                                                                                                    
 if ((m = hostname.match(ipv4MappedDotted))) return m[1];                                                                                                                    
 if ((m = hostname.match(ipv4MappedHex)))    return hexToIPv4(m[1], m[2]);                                                                                                   
 return hostname;                                                                                                                                                            
};

1. What is CVE-2026-44492? CVE-2026-44492 is a high-severity server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in axios (npm), affecting versions >= 1.0.0, < 1.16.0. It is fixed in 1.16.0, 0.32.0. Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside.
2. How severe is CVE-2026-44492? CVE-2026-44492 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
3. Which versions of axios are affected by CVE-2026-44492? axios (npm) versions >= 1.0.0, < 1.16.0 is affected.
4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-44492? Yes. CVE-2026-44492 is fixed in 1.16.0, 0.32.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
5. Is CVE-2026-44492 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-44492 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-44492 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
7. How do I fix CVE-2026-44492?
   • Upgrade axios to 1.16.0 or later
   • Upgrade axios to 0.32.0 or later