Summary
Workarounds
Administrators should review which users have been granted add or change permissions for the Webhook data model, and should review currently defined Webhook records for safety and validity. Other than that, no specific workaround has been identified.
References
Impact
Nautobot's Webhook data model and associated feature set could be configured by users with sufficient access to perform requests to various hosts and IP addresses that should not be permitted, allowing for various behaviors similar to server-side request forgery (SSRF).
Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside. Typical impact: access to internal metadata services, internal APIs, or cloud credentials.
CVE-2026-44797 has a CVSS score of 8.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.1.2, 2.4.33); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Remediation advice
Fixes are available in Nautobot v2.4.33 and v3.1.2.
In support of this fix, three new settings variables have been added to Nautobot:
WEBHOOK_ALLOWED_SCHEMES- By default new or updatedWebhookrecords will be restricted to HTTP or HTTPS only, disallowing other schemes that may have been previously allowed. Administrators should audit existingWebhookrecords to identify any that are invalid, and either update/delete said records or customizeWEBHOOK_ALLOWED_SCHEMESas appropriate.WEBHOOK_ADDITIONAL_BLOCKED_NETWORKS- This can be used to specify additional IP networks that should be denied toWebhooksending, for example some deployments may wish to disallow RFC1918 addresses or even disallow all networks and carve out specific exemptions using the following setting.WEBHOOK_ALLOWED_HOSTS- This can be used to provide an allow-list of specific hosts that would otherwise be blocked by anyWEBHOOK_ADDITIONAL_BLOCKED_NETWORKSconfiguration.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-44797? CVE-2026-44797 is a high-severity server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in nautobot (pip), affecting versions >= 3.0.0a2, < 3.1.2. It is fixed in 3.1.2, 2.4.33. Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside.
- How severe is CVE-2026-44797? CVE-2026-44797 has a CVSS score of 8.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of nautobot are affected by CVE-2026-44797? nautobot (pip) versions >= 3.0.0a2, < 3.1.2 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-44797? Yes. CVE-2026-44797 is fixed in 3.1.2, 2.4.33. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-44797 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-44797 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-44797 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-44797?
- Upgrade
nautobotto 3.1.2 or later - Upgrade
nautobotto 2.4.33 or later
- Upgrade