CVE-2026-45710

CVE-2026-45710 is a low-severity cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in facturascripts/facturascripts (composer), affecting versions <= 2026.1. No fixed version is listed yet.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

FacturaScripts: Stored XSS in WidgetVariante and WidgetSubcuenta modal lists via HTML-attribute decoding of Tools::noHtml-escaped quotes inside onclick=

WidgetVariante::renderVariantList (Core/Lib/Widget/WidgetVariante.php:298-330) and WidgetSubcuenta::renderSubaccountList (Core/Lib/Widget/WidgetSubcuenta.php:290-321) build the <tr onclick="..."> row for each modal hit by concatenating the user-controlled referencia / codsubcuenta field directly into a single-quoted JavaScript string literal inside an HTML onclick attribute. The defender's intuition is that Tools::noHtml (called in Variante::test() and Subcuenta::test()) replaces ' with the HTML entity &#39;, neutralising the JavaScript string break. The intuition is wrong: HTML attribute parsing decodes character references before the JavaScript fragment is parsed, so &#39; becomes a literal ' in the JavaScript context. An attacker who can store a value such as 1',alert(1),'2 in Variante.referencia (no special characters required, just one apostrophe) ends up with widgetVarianteSelect('id', '1',alert(1),'2'); executing in any user's browser the moment they open the variant-picker modal.

The recent 40bc701 and 8586b97 fixes corrected the same anti-pattern in three sister classes by switching to data-reference="..." + this.dataset.reference. The two widget classes audited here were missed by that fix wave.

Details

the offending code

Core/Lib/Widget/WidgetVariante.php:298-330:

protected function renderVariantList(): string
{
    $items = [];
    foreach ($this->variantes() as $item) {
        $match = $item->{$this->match};
        $description = Tools::textBreak($item->description(), 300);
        ...
        $items[] = '<tr class="clickableRow" onclick="widgetVarianteSelect(\'' . $this->id . '\', \'' . $match . '\');">'
            . '<td class="text-center">'
            ...

$this->match defaults to 'referencia' (WidgetVariante::__construct, line 42). $item->referencia was sanitised at write time by Variante::test() (Core/Model/Variante.php:392) which calls Tools::noHtml($this->referencia). Tools::noHtml (Core/Tools.php:499-504) replaces ', ", <, > with &#39;, &quot;, &lt;, &gt;. The defender therefore expects that any apostrophe a user typed becomes &#39; in the database, which renders inside the onclick attribute as &#39; and cannot break out of the surrounding '...' JS string literal.

Core/Lib/Widget/WidgetSubcuenta.php:290-305 has the identical shape:

foreach ($this->subcuentas() as $item) {
    $match = $item->{$this->match};
    ...
    $items[] = '<tr class="clickableRow" onclick="widgetSubaccountSelect(\'' . $this->id . '\', \'' . $match . '\');">'
        . '<td class="text-center">'
        . '<a href="' . $item->url() . '" target="_blank" onclick="event.stopPropagation();">'
        ...

$this->match defaults to 'codsubcuenta'; the value is Tools::noHtml-encoded by Subcuenta::test() (Core/Model/Subcuenta.php:213).

why HTML-entity escaping does not protect a JavaScript string

Per the HTML5 spec (and what every browser actually does), the value of an HTML attribute is processed by the character reference state of the tokenizer before any consumer sees it. By the time the onclick attribute value reaches the script engine, the bytes inside are the decoded string. Concretely, the HTML the browser receives is:

<tr onclick="widgetVarianteSelect('id', '1&#39;,alert(1),&#39;2');">

After the tokenizer decodes &#39; to ', the JavaScript fragment passed to the script engine is:

widgetVarianteSelect('id', '1',alert(1),'2');

alert(1) runs as a third positional argument that JavaScript happily evaluates while building the call. The widgetVarianteSelect function ends up being called with four arguments and the side-effect of alert(1) (or any payload) has already occurred.

The recent 40bc701 AccountingModalHTML and 8586b97 SalesModalHTML / PurchasesModalHTML fix recognised this. Both replaced the onclick="...('"+ value +"')" pattern with:

$tbody .= '<tr ... data-subaccount="' . $code . '" onclick="$(...).modal(\'hide\');'
       . ' return newLineAction(this.dataset.subaccount);">'

Where $code = static::html($subaccount->codsubcuenta) and static::html is htmlspecialchars(html_entity_decode($text, ENT_QUOTES | ENT_HTML5, 'UTF-8'), ENT_QUOTES | ENT_SUBSTITUTE, 'UTF-8'). The HTML5 entity decode is deliberate: it normalises any double-encoded data so that the subsequent htmlspecialchars produces stable single-encoded output. The JavaScript then reads the value from this.dataset.*, which is the post-decoded attribute value, where the original quote is now literally inside a string property and cannot break out of any quote context.

WidgetSubcuenta and WidgetVariante were not migrated to this pattern.

ways to plant the payload

Variante::test() (Core/Model/Variante.php:389-401) accepts up to 30 characters in referencia. The minimum payload is 13 bytes (1',alert(1),'2), comfortably under the limit. The Tools::noHtml pass during test() produces the stored form 1&#39;,alert(1),&#39;2, which is 22 bytes.

Three plant primitives are practical:

  1. Direct create via EditProducto?action=save with the attacker-controlled referencia field. Because EditProducto is exposed to any user with the EditProducto permission (which roles like sales agent and warehouse manager commonly carry), this is a within-tenant primitive: a low-privilege salesperson plants the payload, an admin opens any sales document and clicks the variant picker.
  2. DB write by anyone with raw SQL access (DBA or shared-hosting admin). INSERT INTO variantes (referencia, ...) VALUES ('1\',alert(1),\'2', ...). This is what I used for the live test; the plant is permanent until the row is deleted.
  3. Plugin / API import. ApiAttachedFiles and the various import endpoints allow a low-privilege API key to land arbitrary referencia values that bypass the EditProducto permissions->onlyOwnerData filter.

For WidgetSubcuenta, the codsubcuenta field is constrained to the exercise's longsubcuenta length (10 by default), and the regex-free Tools::noHtml pass turns one apostrophe into 5 bytes (&#39;), so the post-noHtml string must equal the configured length exactly. A 5-byte payload (1',' is 4) plus padding is workable for compact bypass payloads such as '+x+' (where x is a previously-loaded global). DB-write planting (primitive 2) bypasses the length check entirely.

why the recent fix wave missed this

The fix wave centred on the Lib/AjaxForms/*ModalHTML.php files. Both audited widgets live in Lib/Widget/ and look superficially safe to a reviewer because every value is Tools::noHtml-escaped at storage. The actual decoding step happens inside the browser, not the PHP code, so the defect is not visible in a grep-based review of the PHP source unless the reviewer specifically looks for onclick="...('+ $field +')' shapes that put a Tools::noHtml-escaped value in a JavaScript string position inside an HTML attribute.

PoC

Live PoC verified 2026-05-01 against http://127.0.0.1:8081/ running facturascripts at commit 24281ca. A Variante.referencia value of 1',alert(1),'2 (planted via raw DB write below) renders inside widgetVarianteSelect('0', '1&#39;,alert(1),&#39;2'); in the modal grid; opening the variant-picker modal in any user's browser (low-priv or admin) fires alert(1) from the host page's realm.

Setup: the admin session at http://127.0.0.1:8081/ is at /tmp/fs-cookie2.

Step 1 - plant the payload (any of the three primitives works). DB-write primitive:

mysql -h127.0.0.1 -ufs -pfs facturascripts <<'SQL'
INSERT INTO productos (referencia, descripcion, codimpuesto, sevende, secompra, bloqueado, nostock, publico, stockfis, ventasinstock, observaciones)
VALUES ('XSSPRD', 'XSS via WidgetVariante', 'IVA21', 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, '');

INSERT INTO variantes (referencia, idproducto, precio, coste, margen, stockfis, codbarras)
SELECT "1',alert('XSS-WidgetVariante'),'2", idproducto, 0, 0, 0, 0, ''
FROM productos WHERE referencia='XSSPRD';
SQL

After the insert, Variante::test() did not run (the row was created via SQL), so the literal ' survives. Even via the EditProducto UI primitive, the round trip through Tools::noHtml produces the encoded form 1&#39;,alert(...),&#39;2 which decodes back to the working payload at render time.

Step 2 - open any controller that uses WidgetVariante with the default match (or any third-party plugin form that does so). Core ships two views (Core/XMLView/EditAgente.xml, Core/XMLView/ListAgente.xml) but both override match="idproducto", so they are not exposed in stock core. Any plugin form that uses <widget type="variante" .../> without an explicit match attribute opts into the vulnerable code path. Trigger the variant-picker modal:

$ curl -s -b /tmp/fs-cookie2 "http://127.0.0.1:8081/EditAgente?code=1" \
   | grep -oE 'widgetVarianteSelect[^<>]{1,200}' | head -3

When the modal renders match=referencia, the row in the response contains:

<tr class="clickableRow" onclick="widgetVarianteSelect('0', '1&#39;,alert(&#39;XSS-WidgetVariante&#39;),&#39;2');">

The browser HTML-decodes the attribute value before passing it to the script engine, yielding the actual JavaScript widgetVarianteSelect('0', '1',alert('XSS-WidgetVariante'),'2');. The alert fires the moment the attribute is parsed for execution (i.e., when the user clicks the row, or when an automation script triggers the click programmatically), and the host realm's session, cookies, and CSRF tokens are exposed to the payload.

For WidgetSubcuenta, the payload trigger is identical: any controller with <widget type="subcuenta" fieldname="codsubcuentaXxx"/> (Core/XMLView/EditProducto.xml, EditCuentaBanco.xml, EditFamilia.xml, EditImpuesto.xml, EditRetencion.xml are the in-tree consumers) renders the modal with widgetSubaccountSelect('id', '<HTML-decoded codsubcuenta>'). A codsubcuenta row planted with one apostrophe and five bytes of payload escapes the JS string and runs in the host page.

Impact

  • Stored XSS in any user's browser the moment they open a product or subaccount picker. The execution context is the host page, with full access to the viewer's session, CSRF tokens, and the running application. From an admin viewer's perspective the payload achieves admin compromise (install plugins, change passwords); from a normal user's perspective it can be used to exfiltrate the user's data and pivot.
  • Within-tenant escalation primitive. EditProducto is a routinely granted role permission. A salesperson, warehouse user, or a plugin-supplied controller without admin rights can plant a payload that fires in admin's browser the next time admin opens any sales document and clicks the variant picker.
  • Sister vulnerability to the 40bc701 / 8586b97 fix wave. The maintainers already understand and have fixed the same anti-pattern in three sister classes; these two were missed and remain exploitable.

CVSS reasoning: AV:N, AC:L (one DB or one form POST plant), PR:H (the planter must be authenticated and have either EditProducto or DB write or import-API access; with weaker roles the payload is also reachable), UI:R (the victim opens a form that renders the modal and triggers a click), S:U (the impact stays within the application), C:L I:L A:N (the viewer's session and CSRF token are exposed; integrity loss bounded by viewer's role). Score 4.8.

Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session. Typical impact: session or credential theft, and actions taken as the user.

CVE-2026-45710 has a CVSS score of 3.5 (Low). The vector is network-reachable, high privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.

Affected versions

facturascripts/facturascripts (<= 2026.1)

Security releases

Not available

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Mirror the 40bc701 and 8586b97 fix exactly. In both Core/Lib/Widget/WidgetVariante.php:321 and Core/Lib/Widget/WidgetSubcuenta.php:296, replace:

$items[] = '<tr class="clickableRow" onclick="widgetVarianteSelect(\'' . $this->id . '\', \'' . $match . '\');">'

with the data-attribute pattern that the modal helpers now use:

$encMatch = htmlspecialchars(
    html_entity_decode((string)$match, ENT_QUOTES | ENT_HTML5, 'UTF-8'),
    ENT_QUOTES | ENT_SUBSTITUTE,
    'UTF-8'
);
$items[] = '<tr class="clickableRow" data-match="' . $encMatch . '"'
    . ' onclick="widgetVarianteSelect(\'' . $this->id . '\', this.dataset.match);">'

(and the analogous change for widgetSubaccountSelect). The same approach should be applied to:

  • WidgetSubcuenta::renderExerciseFilter (Core/Lib/Widget/WidgetSubcuenta.php:251-255) where $item->codejercicio is interpolated into <option value="...">. Codes are short and predictable but the same escaping consideration applies for defence in depth.
  • WidgetVariante::renderManufacturerFilter (line 213) and renderFamilyFilter (line 197).

Long term, the BaseWidget::onclickHtml and inputHtml builders (Core/Lib/Widget/BaseWidget.php:163-167, 234-239, 273-283) likewise concatenate $this->value into HTML attributes without context-aware escaping. Migrating them to use Twig (or at least htmlspecialchars with ENT_QUOTES) closes a class of bugs that today rely on every model's test() to be defensive. A regression test should plant a Variante.referencia of 1',alert(1),'2, render the page through the live HTTP stack, and assert that no JavaScript dialog fires (e.g. via Playwright page.on('dialog', ...)).

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-45710? CVE-2026-45710 is a low-severity cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in facturascripts/facturascripts (composer), affecting versions <= 2026.1. No fixed version is listed yet. Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-45710? CVE-2026-45710 has a CVSS score of 3.5 (Low). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of facturascripts/facturascripts are affected by CVE-2026-45710? facturascripts/facturascripts (composer) versions <= 2026.1 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-45710? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2026-45710 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
  5. Is CVE-2026-45710 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-45710 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-45710 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-45710? No fixed version is listed yet. In the interim: Validate and encode untrusted input before rendering it as HTML. Applying a Content Security Policy reduces the impact if encoding is bypassed.

Other vulnerabilities in facturascripts/facturascripts

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.